Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-07-31
2013-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Robotic Arm Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients
NCT00333983
Evaluation of Robot Assisted Neuro-Rehabilitation
NCT01253018
Air Muscle and Task Practice in Upper Limb Stroke Rehab
NCT00729625
Robotic Upper-Limb Neurorehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patient
NCT00037934
Rehabilitation Multi Sensory Room for Robot Assisted Functional Movements in Upper-limb Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke
NCT03208634
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Overall, we will establish whether using our technology to perform tasks that are more or less game-like and functionally relevant to driving will make a difference in the impaired arm after stroke. Two groups of stroke survivors will be followed while they complete therapy. We have three main aims. In aim #1, we will determine whether therapy using functional tasks compared to simple rote tasks lead to significant increases in the use of the arm during therapy and the arm improvements experienced by the subjects after the therapy. In aim #2, we will measure how each group engage in the more and less functional therapy and monitor their effort and enjoyment during training. This aim will help us to determine the value of more fun training. In aim #3, we will upgrade our technology for use in the home therapy environment and follow some subjects to determine if the results change in under supervised condition (at home)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TheraDrive Assistive Device
Rote Therapy versus Fun Therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* They must be at least six months post-stroke.
* 18 years of age or older with a clinical diagnosis of hemiparesis (as verified by medical record and a medical expert).
* They have voluntary control with a low to medium range of motion function (UE-FT\<5) and a muscle tone.
* They are functionally stable (no significant changes in motor function over a week) and are able to tolerate being seated upright for 90 minutes.
* They report no excessive pain the impaired arm.
* If left neglect or spasticity is detected in the impaired arm, these levels must not interfere with the ability to cognitively complete the tasks or turn a wheel.
* They must not be participating in any experimental rehabilitation or drug therapies.
* If subjects are receiving chemical injections for spasticity, they must be at least 3-months away from their last treatment.
* They must have driven prior to stroke.
* They are not clinically depressed (as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) short form (Sheikh and Yesavage, 1986).
Once informed consent is given twenty-four of these subjects will be randomized into two training groups (fun driving: fun and functional driving activities and rote tracking (12 subjects): rote and functional tracking activities). Two subjects will be randomized the case study group. The groups will be matched in initial motor function.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American Heart Association
OTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michelle J. Johnson
Adjunct Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michelle J Johnson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical College of Wisconsin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clement J Zablocki VA - Rehabilitation Robotics R&D Lab
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0635450Z
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.