Robot-Assisted Therapy and Motor Learning: An Active Learning Program for Stroke

NCT ID: NCT02747433

Last Updated: 2022-05-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in older adults in the United States. At six months after stroke, up to 65% of the more than 795,000 persons who experience a stroke each year continue to have motor impairments that inhibit functional use of the weaker arm during daily activities and negatively impact quality of life. Rehabilitation robots provide clinicians with new treatment options to improve movement and arm function after stroke. The purpose of this pilot study is to develop and test a therapy called the "Active Learning Program for Stroke" (ALPS). We are combining this therapy program with robot-assisted therapy and a home program for the stroke-affected arm and hand.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Little is known about how individuals learn to utilize robot-trained movements during upper extremity (UE) activities in the home and community and whether specific instruction can enhance motor learning and carry-over.. Systematic reviews of robot-assisted therapy for the paretic UE confirm gains in motor capacity as measured by clinical assessments, but provide little evidence of improved UE performance during daily tasks and occupations. These findings may be attributed to the limited availability of rehabilitation robots to train the paretic hand and a primary focus on intensity of practice with little regard for other principles of motor learning and experience-dependent neuroplasticity. These principles, including the salience of training tasks, transfer of acquired skills to similar activities, and active engagement and problem solving, are key to task-oriented training paradigms in stroke (e.g. constraint-induced movement therapy) but have not been well integrated into robot-assisted therapy protocols. The transfer of robot-trained movements to UE activities within the home and community needs further exploration before widespread use in rehabilitation practice is expected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Single blind study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ALPS + Robot-Assisted Therapy (RT)

Armeo and Amadeo robot-assisted intensive upper extremity therapy 1 hr sessions 3x week for 6 weeks plus ALPS training

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Robot-Assisted Therapy (RT)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Highly repetitive robot-assisted therapy for paretic arm with Armeo (1 hr sessions, 3x week for 3 weeks) followed by robot-assisted therapy for hand motions with Amadeo (3x week for 3 weeks). Robot training to be accompanied with ALPS motor learning program directed toward UE self management and transfer of training to daily activities in home \& community.

ALPS + Robot + Task-Oriented Training (RT-TOT)

Armeo and Amadeo robot-assisted intensive upper extremity therapy 30 mins, 3x week for 6 weeks plus ALPS training. Task oriented training will be provided for remaining 30 min of each treatment session

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Robot & Task-Oriented Training (RT-TOT)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Highly repetitive robot-assisted therapy for paretic arm with Armeo (30 min sessions, 3x week for 3 weeks) followed by robot-assisted therapy for hand motions with Amadeo (3x week for 3 weeks). Task oriented training will be delivered for remaining 30 mins of each treatment session. Robot and task oriented training to be accompanied with ALPS motor learning program directed toward UE self management and transfer of training to daily activities in home \& community.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robot-Assisted Therapy (RT)

Highly repetitive robot-assisted therapy for paretic arm with Armeo (1 hr sessions, 3x week for 3 weeks) followed by robot-assisted therapy for hand motions with Amadeo (3x week for 3 weeks). Robot training to be accompanied with ALPS motor learning program directed toward UE self management and transfer of training to daily activities in home \& community.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Robot & Task-Oriented Training (RT-TOT)

Highly repetitive robot-assisted therapy for paretic arm with Armeo (30 min sessions, 3x week for 3 weeks) followed by robot-assisted therapy for hand motions with Amadeo (3x week for 3 weeks). Task oriented training will be delivered for remaining 30 mins of each treatment session. Robot and task oriented training to be accompanied with ALPS motor learning program directed toward UE self management and transfer of training to daily activities in home \& community.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Moderate UE hemiparesis (i.e. some ability to move shoulder, elbow \& hand and initial score on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) between 21-50/66))
* Intact cognitive function to understand and actively engage in the ALPS robotic therapy procedures (Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score \>/=26/30)12 during initial evaluation visit

Exclusion Criteria

* No more than moderate impairments in paretic UE sensation, passive range of motion, and pain that would limit ability to engage in therapy
* Increased muscle tone as indicated by score of \>/= 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale;
* Hemispatial neglect or visual field loss measured by the symbol cancellation subtest on the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test 13
* Aphasia sufficient to limit comprehension and completion of the treatment protocol
* Currently enrolled or has plans to enroll in other upper limb therapy/research during the study period
* Contraindications for robot-assisted therapy including recent fracture or skin lesion of paretic UE
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

82 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Susan Fasoli, ScD OTR/L

Associate Professor, MGH Institute of Health Professions

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Susan E Fasoli, ScD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MGH Institute of Health Professions & Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Paolo Bonato, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital & Harvard Medical School

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Adans-Dester C, Fasoli SE, Fabara E, Menard N, Fox AB, Severini G, Bonato P. Can kinematic parameters of 3D reach-to-target movements be used as a proxy for clinical outcome measures in chronic stroke rehabilitation? An exploratory study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 8;17(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00730-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32771020 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015P002107

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Robot-Assisted Motivating Rehabilitation
NCT00393926 COMPLETED PHASE1
Evaluation of Robot Assisted Neuro-Rehabilitation
NCT01253018 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2