Stroke Inpatients Rehabilitation Reinforcement of Activity
NCT ID: NCT01891565
Last Updated: 2013-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-07-31
2015-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objectives of the study are:
i. To assess the impact of feedback from Personal Activity Monitors (PAM)s on amount of active practice, walking speed and distance in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
ii. To assess the impact of feedback from PAMs on physical, psycho-emotional, cognitive and ecosocial Health-Related Quality of Life of stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
iii. To assess the acceptability of thigh-strapped accelerometer use among stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
iv. To assess the reliability and validity of thigh-strapped accelerometer use among stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
Hypotheses In moderate to severely disabled subjects who are receiving in-patient rehabilitation, daily feedback from PAMs about purposeful activity will increase the amount of active practice by \>30%, a higher proportion of subjects who reach the level of independence for walking, and increase walking speed by 25%, leading to higher mean walking speeds and distances at the time of discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Daily feedback from PAMs on increase in walking speed and distances will improve physical, psychological, cognitive and ecosocial domains of Health-related quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation Reinforcement of ACTivity
NCT01246882
Using Wireless-technology for Feedback of Daily Walking Activity Post-stroke
NCT01521234
The Effect of Activity Feedback Enabled by Smart Watches During In-patient Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT02587585
Retraining the Walking Pattern After Stroke
NCT03813342
Activity Levels and Rehabilitation Outcomes of Patients Post-stroke
NCT03257111
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Activity Feedback
Feedback
Feedback
No Feedback
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Feedback
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Time from onset of stroke to admission for rehabilitation \<35 days.
* Stroke from any cause (thrombotic infarct, cardioembolism, intracerebral hemorrhage) that includes unilateral hemiparesis. Hemiparesis means less than or equal 4/5 strength by the British Medical Council scale for hip flexion tested supine and for knee or ankle flexion and extension (scores less than or equal 22 of 25)
* Ability to follow simple instructions, especially to understand verbal reinforcement about activity.
* Independent in mobility prior to admission.
* Able to walk with no more than physical assistance of 2 persons for at least 3 meters. Subjects can use any type of assistive device and brace needed.
* Able to understand and repeat information related to the Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Aphasia with inability to follow 2-step directions during therapeutic instructions or answers Yes/No to questions with greater than or equal 75% accuracy related to personal health and symptoms.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Ibadan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Mayowa Owolabi
Consultant Neurologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mayowa O Owolabi
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Ibadan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University College Hospital
Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.