Retraining the Walking Pattern After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03813342

Last Updated: 2024-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-06

Study Completion Date

2023-12-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to determine the effects of pairing gait training with different forms of visual feedback about leg movements in individual post-stroke to modify/normalize their gait pattern over time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke often results in functional gait deficits and abnormal gait patterns. Typically, several features of gait are altered (e.g. knee joint movement decreases and step lengths are asymmetric). Data show that walking patterns after neurologic injury can be changed through gait training, but traditional rehabilitation approaches typically focus on changing one feature of gait at a time. However, the investigators have recently shown that in a single session individuals post-stroke are able to learn to change multiple components of this impaired gait pattern at the same time.

To further leverage this ability to learn multiple things at once, the investigators have also studied how different forms of visual feedback about leg movements may best facilitate individuals to make meaningful changes to multiple features of the gait pattern. Specifically, they have studied two forms of visual feedback - 1) multidimensional, with multiple streams of information about leg movements, and 2) one-dimensional, which distills/summarizes multiple pieces of information about the gait pattern into a single source of feedback. They have shown that the one-dimensional summary feedback is more effective to help people learn a new gait pattern that requires changing multiple features of how they are walking. This work has focused on single training sessions in neurologically intact individuals, but the authors would like to study the effects of longer-term training with these different forms of feedback. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to gather preliminary data to inform the design of a clinical trial of gait training to treat walking deficits post-stroke. The investigators will gather data to determine whether training with different forms of visual feedback about leg movements are effective at improving gait patterns post-stroke - and which form of feedback may be more effective.

The investigators will study adults with cerebral damage due to stroke. Subjects with hemiparesis will undergo training 3 times a week for a total of 12 training session. These 12 sessions will be broken into 2 blocks of 6 sessions, with at least a 2 week break in between. In each block, training will occur with one form of visual (multi- or one-dimensional). Participants will complete training with both forms of feedback, the order of feedback forms will be randomly assigned. These studies will provide important new information about gait training with visual feedback in individuals post-stroke. This study is critical for developing procedural reliability processes, calculating effect sizes, and determining other salient clinical variables in preparation for a randomized clinical trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Hemiparesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

treadmill with multi-dimensional and one-dimensional feedback
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Multichannel Visual Feedback

Gait training with visual feedback of joint kinematics. The visual feedback will contain information about the lower limb joint angles. We will instruct subjects to use the feedback to reach a target walking pattern. In this arm, subjects will receive 4 channels of visual information, each of which represents a joint angle (right and left hips, right and left knees).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gait training with visual feedback of joint kinematics

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Gait training will be accomplished using a Woodway treadmill. The visual feedback will contain information about the real-time lower-limb joint angles. We will instruct participants to use the feedback to reach a target walking pattern.

Single Channel Visual Feedback

Gait training with visual feedback of joint kinematics. The visual feedback will contain information about the lower limb joint angles. We will instruct subjects to use the feedback to reach a target walking pattern. In this arm, subjects will receive 1 channel of visual information that encompasses information from 4 lower limb joint angles (right and left hips, right and left knees).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gait training with visual feedback of joint kinematics

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Gait training will be accomplished using a Woodway treadmill. The visual feedback will contain information about the real-time lower-limb joint angles. We will instruct participants to use the feedback to reach a target walking pattern.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gait training with visual feedback of joint kinematics

Gait training will be accomplished using a Woodway treadmill. The visual feedback will contain information about the real-time lower-limb joint angles. We will instruct participants to use the feedback to reach a target walking pattern.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* stroke or hemiparesis (\>6 months post stroke)
* able to walk but has a residual gait deficit (including those who walk with a cane or walker)
* Able to walk for 5 minutes at their self-paced speed
* Adults age 20-80

Exclusion Criteria

* Cerebellar signs (e.g.ataxic hemiparesis)
* Any neurologic condition other than stroke
* Uncontrolled diabetes
* Congestive heart failure
* Peripheral artery disease with claudication
* Pulmonary or renal failure
* Unstable angina
* Uncontrolled hypertension (\>190/110 mmHg)
* MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test for Dementia) \< 23
* Severe aphasia
* Orthopedic or pain conditions that limit walking
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amy J. Bastian, Ph.D.

Professor of Neuroscience

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amy J Bastian, PhD, PT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Motion Analysis Lab in the Kennedy Krieger Institute

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2R37NS090610

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB00097573

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gait Recovery After Stroke
NCT06806748 NOT_YET_RECRUITING