Reducing Type 2 Diabetes Diagnostic Delays Using Decision Support
NCT ID: NCT02199769
Last Updated: 2023-04-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
747 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-01
2016-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electronic Decision Support for Intervention in Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes
NCT02924207
The Potential of Technology to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Quality of Care
NCT00221455
Diabetes Self-Management Models to Reduce Health Disparities
NCT01221090
Use of a Computer-Assisted Decision Support (CADS) System in Management of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01382264
Using Remote Monitoring to Address Health Disparities in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT06517576
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This proposal will leverage the Epic EMR at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) to improve the detection and follow-up testing rates of abnormal glucose values in real-world practice.
The investigators will conduct a cluster randomized, pragmatic trial comparing the effectiveness of a clinical decision support strategy versus usual care to reduce failures in timely follow-up of abnormal RPGs.
The investigators will focus on the cohort of 20,000 established patients cared for by 31 attending physicians in three outpatient, adult primary care practices at UTSW (two general internal medicine one family medicine and one geriatric practice). Primary care providers (PCPs) will be randomized to either the clinical decision support intervention or usual care. Providers in the clinical decision support/intervention arm will receive clinical decision support that identifies abnormal random glucose values and prompts providers to conduct diabetes screening. Outcomes will be tracked at the patient level and all subjects will be followed for 12 months to assess rates of follow-up diabetes testing, time to testing, rates of subsequent diabetes diagnosis, and time to diagnosis. Data on study eligibility, patient clinical risk factors and sociodemographics, provider and visit characteristics, and outcomes will be ascertained using the comprehensive Epic EMR. The investigators hypothesize that the visit-based provider decision support will be superior to usual care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Clinical Decision Support
Visit-based, EMR-enabled case identification and real-time decision support to identify patients without diabetes who have a RBG\>= 125mg/dL and no resulted diabetes screening.
Clinical Decision Support
Investigators will develop and implement an automated Diabetes Detection Tool (DDT) that does data mining on EMR lab data to systematically identify all primary care patients with elevated RPGs who are at high risk of diabetes and in need of further diabetes testing/screening.
Usual care
Diabetes screening/testing and diagnosis per usual care at the discretion of the treating physician.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical Decision Support
Investigators will develop and implement an automated Diabetes Detection Tool (DDT) that does data mining on EMR lab data to systematically identify all primary care patients with elevated RPGs who are at high risk of diabetes and in need of further diabetes testing/screening.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. an established patient of a study PCP;
2. have no diagnosis of diabetes (encounter diagnoses, problem list, medical history);
3. over 18 years of age
4. have at least one RPGā„125mg/dL in the past 2 years
Exclusion Criteria
1. pregnant;
2. under 18 years of age and
3. Patients with an A1C\<6.5% in the past 12 months, as this would indicate the appropriate follow-up was done
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Edward Bowen
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael E Bowen, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU 062013-058
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.