Diabetes Electronic Prompt for Improved Care Coordination and Treatment in the ED
NCT ID: NCT06899191
Last Updated: 2025-05-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-30
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
ED clinicians will receive alerts called Our Practice Advisories (OPA's) through the EPIC EHR. The 1st OPA triggers when a random point-of-care (POC) glucose is ≥250 mg/dL, prompting a suggested additional HA1c order. A 2nd OPA triggers if the resulting HA1c is ≥10%, prompting consideration of further care coordination in the Observation Unit. Investigators will compare the outcomes post-intervention compared to pre-intervention.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enhancing Preventative Health Behaviors Among Emergency Department Hyperglycemic Patients
NCT06663813
Impact of a Diabetes Education Mobile Web Application on Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes
NCT05893927
Reducing Type 2 Diabetes Diagnostic Delays Using Decision Support
NCT02199769
Diabetes Risk Education and Communication Trial
NCT03283657
MedStar Health Type 2 Diabetes Pathway to Control
NCT02925312
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
All ED providers exposed to electronic alerts
Hemoglobin A1c
Prompt to order A1c
Observation Unit
Electronic prompt nudging ED provider to consider admitting patient to the Observation Unit for care coordination and more aggressive glycemic control
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hemoglobin A1c
Prompt to order A1c
Observation Unit
Electronic prompt nudging ED provider to consider admitting patient to the Observation Unit for care coordination and more aggressive glycemic control
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who arrive in the emergency department
* Not pregnant or peri-partum
* Not SARS-COV-2 PCR positive in past 7 days
Exclusion Criteria
* Diabetic foot ulcer or skin complications
* Hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state with neurologic impairment
* Patients who leave against medical advice (AMA), elope from the ED, or are transferred to another facility
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paul Peng, MD PhD MSCR
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yan JW, Vujcic B, Le BN, Van Aarsen K, Chen T, Halane F, Clemens KK. Predictors of 30-day recurrent emergency department visits for hyperglycemia in patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study. CJEM. 2024 Jun;26(6):424-430. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00686-4. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
Magee MF, Nassar C. Hemoglobin A1c testing in an emergency department. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 1;5(6):1437-43. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500615.
Magee MF, Nassar CM, Copeland J, Fokar A, Sharretts JM, Dubin JS, Smith MS. Synergy to reduce emergency department visits for uncontrolled hyperglycemia. Diabetes Educ. 2013 May-Jun;39(3):354-64. doi: 10.1177/0145721713484593. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
King WM 4th, McDermott MT, Trujillo JM. Initial management of severe hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational study. Diabetes Ther. 2013 Dec;4(2):375-84. doi: 10.1007/s13300-013-0036-9. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
Ginde AA, Delaney KE, Pallin DJ, Camargo CA Jr. Multicenter survey of emergency physician management and referral for hyperglycemia. J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.11.088. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
Gale J, Varndell W, James S, Perry L. Unscheduled emergency department presentations with diabetes: Identifying high risk characteristics. Australas Emerg Care. 2023 Sep;26(3):205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
Driver BE, Olives TD, Prekker ME, Miner JR, Klein LR. The Association of Emergency Department Treatments for Hyperglycemia with Glucose Reduction and Emergency Department Length of Stay. J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):791-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.068. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
Driver BE, Olives TD, Bischof JE, Salmen MR, Miner JR. Discharge Glucose Is Not Associated With Short-Term Adverse Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Moderate to Severe Hyperglycemia. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;68(6):697-705.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.04.057. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
Driver BE, Klein LR, Cole JB, Prekker ME, Fagerstrom ET, Miner JR. Comparison of two glycemic discharge goals in ED patients with hyperglycemia, a randomized trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1295-1300. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.053. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, Gabbay RA, Green J, Maruthur NM, Rosas SE, Del Prato S, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tankova T, Tsapas A, Buse JB. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2022 Dec;65(12):1925-1966. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05787-2. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
Crawford AL, Laiteerapong N. Type 2 Diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jun;177(6):ITC81-ITC96. doi: 10.7326/AITC202406180. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
Charfen MA, Ipp E, Kaji AH, Saleh T, Qazi MF, Lewis RJ. Detection of undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetic states in high-risk emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2009 May;16(5):394-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00374.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
Bowen ME, Xuan L, Lingvay I, Halm EA. Random blood glucose: a robust risk factor for type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Apr;100(4):1503-10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4116. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S20-S42. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S002.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro2024002629
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.