The Synergy to Control Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Program for Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT02269098

Last Updated: 2017-01-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A 4 week prospective, randomized controlled study was carried out to assess the impact of a care delivery intervention which focused on blood glucose (BG) management among adults with type 2 diabetes presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with BG \> 200mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L). The intervention was designed by a multi-disciplinary team of ED physicians and nurses, endocrinologists and diabetes educators. The intervention incorporated three components: a guideline-based algorithm for diabetes medication management; survival skills diabetes self-management education (DSME); and support for health system navigation. The control group received usual care per the ED's policies and procedures for management of high blood glucose.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We evaluated a concise diabetes care delivery intervention designed to advance glycemic medications and deliver diabetes self-management education (DSME) among adults with type 2 diabetes presenting to the emergency department (ED) with uncontrolled hyperglycemia. The primary hypothesis was that there would be improvement in HbA1c.

A 4 week, randomized controlled trial provided algorithm-based antihyperglycemic medications management, survival skills DSME and navigation to primary care for ED patients with BG \> 200mg/dL. Medications were titrated and DSME delivered by endocrinologist-supervised certified diabetes educators. Controls received usual care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Medication Adherence HYPERGLYCEMIA

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Diabetes survival skills self-management education; plus diabetes medication management using medication algorithm by diabetes educator supervised by endocrinologist, plus health system naviagation.

Metformin, sulfonylureas and basal insulin were included in the algorithm. Survival skills DSME included: BG meter instruction if the patient did not already have a meter or confirmation of self-BG monitoring technique if they did; instructions on how to self-inject insulin if prescribed; and information on BG targets, signs and treatment of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, basic nutrition information and when to call the doctor or go to the ED.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Diabetes medication management

Intervention Type OTHER

As above plus- Follow-up intervention visits were at 24-72 hrs, 2 and 4 weeks. During each, further DSME was provided, BG logs reviewed, and diabetes medications adjusted as needed by the CDE. Meter and insulin injections skills were reinforced as needed. Outpatient navigation included securing a primary care appointment no later than 4 weeks after study completion. Final contact was via telephone at 90 days. The MMS© (Morisky Medication Adherence Survey) was taken at 2 and 4 weeks and during the final telephone visit. Interim return visits to the ED or admissions to the hospital were queried at each visit. A follow up HbA1C was obtained at week 4 using the POC A1CNow+ ®, and a venous HbA1C was drawn if the POC result was above 13% .

Control

Usual ED care was provided to controls. Hyperglycemia was treated with rapid acting insulin and with IV hydration, if indicated. DM medications were added and/or doses were adjusted at the discretion of the ED physician and prescriptions provided. Insulin, however, was not prescribed as a new medication due to staff concerns regarding post-discharge hypoglycemia and lack of certainty of timely medical follow-up. Follow-up with primary care was recommended.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diabetes medication management

As above plus- Follow-up intervention visits were at 24-72 hrs, 2 and 4 weeks. During each, further DSME was provided, BG logs reviewed, and diabetes medications adjusted as needed by the CDE. Meter and insulin injections skills were reinforced as needed. Outpatient navigation included securing a primary care appointment no later than 4 weeks after study completion. Final contact was via telephone at 90 days. The MMS© (Morisky Medication Adherence Survey) was taken at 2 and 4 weeks and during the final telephone visit. Interim return visits to the ED or admissions to the hospital were queried at each visit. A follow up HbA1C was obtained at week 4 using the POC A1CNow+ ®, and a venous HbA1C was drawn if the POC result was above 13% .

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Survival skills self-management education

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A new or existing diagnosis of type 2 diabetes;
* BG \> 200 mg/dl in the ED;
* age \>/= 18 years;
* willing and able to check BG and self-inject insulin, if required and otherwise stable for discharge to the outpatient setting.

Exclusion Criteria

* type 1 diabetes and other specific types of diabetes per the American Diabetes Association Position Statement on the Classification of Diabetes Mellitus,
* pregnancy or anticipated conception in the next 3 months;
* treatment with a glucocorticoid, unless at a stable physiologic replacement dose; or
* a history of diabetic ketoacidosis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Diabetes Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sanofi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medstar Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michelle F Magee, MD, MBBCh

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medstar Health Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Magee MF, Nassar C. Hemoglobin A1c testing in an emergency department. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 1;5(6):1437-43. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500615.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22226261 (View on PubMed)

Magee MF, Nassar CM, Copeland J, Fokar A, Sharretts JM, Dubin JS, Smith MS. Synergy to reduce emergency department visits for uncontrolled hyperglycemia. Diabetes Educ. 2013 May-Jun;39(3):354-64. doi: 10.1177/0145721713484593. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23610182 (View on PubMed)

Lewis VR, Benda N, Nassar C, Magee M. Successful patient diabetes education in the emergency department. Diabetes Educ. 2015 Jun;41(3):343-50. doi: 10.1177/0145721715577484. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25804628 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

T2DXcel Mobile Application
NCT03890900 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Type 1 Diabetes Education and Support Study
NCT05735340 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA