The Potential of Technology to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Quality of Care

NCT ID: NCT00221455

Last Updated: 2011-07-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-09-30

Study Completion Date

2007-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We seek to determine if patient data entry, data entered based alerts, and data review in a secure patient portal may provide a sustainable approach to improve diabetic outcomes in a cost effective manner. We plan to study the extent to which the portal can improve diabetic outcomes and quality of care. We recognize, however, that some patients will be more predisposed to adopting technology and some will be more predisposed to improving their compliance than others. Hence, we will also develop and test interventions that may improve adoption and compliance. The goals of the proposed study are: 1) to assess whether a web portal will improve care outcomes in diabetic patients; 2a) to describe the characteristics of patients whose health behavior improves over the study period; 2b) to describe the characteristics of patients who adopt the web portal-based disease management technology; 3) to develop and test targeted interventions to increase the adoption of the web portal and improve patient health behavior; and 4) to monitor the ongoing costs associated with the web portal and patient healthcare resource utilization, and to monitor the incremental costs of the interventions designed to improve utilization of the technology and patient compliance with their diabetic regimens.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To date, limited research has been conducted to determine if health information technology (HIT) is effective in improving the outcomes for patients with chronic diseases. Research is required to determine if interventions facilitated by an institutional EMR platform can be implemented such that they support patients with chronic diseases to achieve improved outcomes in a cost effective fashion.

At the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) an ambulatory EMR has been implemented to foster patient safety and institutional best practice guidelines, to facilitate research, and to achieve efficiencies in practice management. Our EMR is the foundation of the CCF patient portal. One of the functions of the portal is to allow patients to enter specific data elements that become part of their permanent medical record. Diabetics can enter and review their home glucometer readings, and view alert messages based on their entries. The entries are transferred to the patient's primary care physician's EMR In-Basket for review.

We recognize that some patients will be more predisposed to technology adoption and some will be more health behavior compliant than others. Therefore, in addition to studying our portal's efficacy in positive diabetic behavior change, we will test if interventions can assist less predisposed and less compliant patients to become more compliant and more inclined to adopt the technology.

The goals of the proposed study are:

1\) to assess whether a web portal will improve care outcomes in diabetic patients; 2a) to describe the characteristics of patients whose health behavior improves over the study period; 2b) to describe the characteristics of patients who adopt the web portal-based disease management technology; 3) to develop and test targeted interventions to increase the adoption of the web portal and improve patient health behavior; 4) to monitor the ongoing costs associated with the web portal and patient healthcare resource utilization, and to monitor the incremental costs of the interventions designed to improve utilization of the technology and patient compliance with their diabetic regimens.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patient diabetic self-management using the diabetic patient portal tools

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A variety of educational interventions for non-adopters of the technology, and for non-compliant patients.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Diabetic patients 18 years of age or older with an established primary care physician at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Exclusion Criteria: An individual not meeting the inclusion criteria
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Martin Harris, MD, MBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Holly D Miller, MD, MBA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50: 179-211.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Avital, M., Vandenbosch, B., (2000) IT-Business Ownership: The Missing Link for IT-Driven Value, Administrative Sciences Association of Canada - 2000 Proceedings (Information Systems), Vol. 21(4): 116-125.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P; American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):917-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.917.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12610059 (View on PubMed)

Beckles GL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM, Herman WH, Aubert RE, Williamson DF. Population-based assessment of the level of care among adults with diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 1998 Sep;21(9):1432-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1432.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9727887 (View on PubMed)

Biermann E, Dietrich W, Standl E. Telecare of diabetic patients with intensified insulin therapy. A randomized clinical trial. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;77:327-32.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11187566 (View on PubMed)

Chang S., Ryoo S., Yu S., Ahn B., (1999) Development of an Internet-Based Home Monitoring System for Diabetes Mellitus, Proceeding of the 4th IEEE Malaysia International Conference on Communications and 4th IEEE Asia Pacific International Symposium on Consumer Electronics, Maleka, Malaysia, November 1999.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Chase HP, Pearson JA, Wightman C, Roberts MD, Oderberg AD, Garg SK. Modem transmission of glucose values reduces the costs and need for clinic visits. Diabetes Care. 2003 May;26(5):1475-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1475.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12716807 (View on PubMed)

Eisenberg JM. Ten lessons for evidence-based technology assessment. JAMA. 1999 Nov 17;282(19):1865-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.19.1865. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10573279 (View on PubMed)

Fishbein M., Ajzen I., (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Friedman RH, Stollerman JE, Mahoney DM, Rozenblyum L. The virtual visit: using telecommunications technology to take care of patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Nov-Dec;4(6):413-25. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040413.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9391929 (View on PubMed)

Friedman RH, Stollerman J, Rozenblyum L, Belfer D, Selim A, Mahoney D, Steinbach S. A telecommunications system to manage patients with chronic disease. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;52 Pt 2:1330-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10384677 (View on PubMed)

Gallagher, K., Vandenbosch, B., (2000) A Systemic View of Continual Change. Best Paper Proceedings of the Sixtieth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2000.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8 Suppl 1:1-30. doi: 10.1258/1357633021937604.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12020415 (View on PubMed)

Hersh WR, Helfand M, Wallace J, Kraemer D, Patterson P, Shapiro S, Greenlick M. Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001;1:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-1-5. Epub 2001 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11737882 (View on PubMed)

Kwon H., Cho J, Kim H., Song B., Ko S., Lee J., Kim S., Chang S., Kim H., Cha B., Lee K., Son H., Lee J., Lee W., Yoon K., (2004) Establishment of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Using the Internet, Diabetes Care, Vol. 27(2):478-83. Mease A, Whitlock W, Brown A, (2000) Telemedicine Improved Diabetic Management. Military Medicine, Vol. 165:279-284. Neubauer A., Priglinger S., Ehrt O., (2001) Electronic Versus Paper-Based Patient Records: a Cost-Benefit Analysis, Ophthalmologe, Vol. 11:1083-8. Norris S., Engelgau M., Narayan K., (2001) Effectiveness of Self-Managed Training in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials, Diabetes Care, Vol. 24/3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Olivarius NF, Beck-Nielsen H, Andreasen AH, Horder M, Pedersen PA. Randomised controlled trial of structured personal care of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMJ. 2001 Oct 27;323(7319):970-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7319.970.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11679387 (View on PubMed)

Piette JD, McPhee SJ, Weinberger M, Mah CA, Kraemer FB. Use of automated telephone disease management calls in an ethnically diverse sample of low-income patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999 Aug;22(8):1302-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.8.1302.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10480775 (View on PubMed)

Ralston JD, Revere D, Robins LS, Goldberg HI. Patients' experience with a diabetes support programme based on an interactive electronic medical record: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1159. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1159.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15142919 (View on PubMed)

Renders CM, Valk GD, Franse LV, Schellevis FG, van Eijk JT, van der Wal G. Long-term effectiveness of a quality improvement program for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice. Diabetes Care. 2001 Aug;24(8):1365-70. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.8.1365.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11473071 (View on PubMed)

Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ, Wagner EH, Eijk Van JT, Assendelft WJ. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2001 Oct;24(10):1821-33. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.10.1821.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11574449 (View on PubMed)

Ross SE, Lin CT. The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):129-38. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1147.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12595402 (View on PubMed)

Schultze, U., Vandenbosch, B., (1998) Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don't, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 8/2: 127-148.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Brandt CA, Corb GJ. Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Mar-Apr;6(2):104-14. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060104.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10094063 (View on PubMed)

Taylor S., Todd P., (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, Vol. 6(2), 144-176.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Tierney WM, Miller ME, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. JAMA. 1993 Jan 20;269(3):379-83.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8418345 (View on PubMed)

Vandenbosch, B., (1995) Healthcare Data Exchange Corporation, In N. Lorenzi, R.T. Riley, M.J. Ball,& J.V. Douglas (Eds.), Transforming Health Care through Information: Case Studies, New York: Springer-Verlag, 337-350.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Vandenbosch, B., (1995) What Makes an ESS Successful: Links Between Types of Use and Perceptions of Competitiveness, Administrative Sciences Association of Canada - 1995 Proceedings (Information Systems), Vol. 16/4: 97-106.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Venkatesh, V. (2000) Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, Vol. 11(4) 342-365.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Wagner EH, Grothaus LC, Sandhu N, Galvin MS, McGregor M, Artz K, Coleman EA. Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2001 Apr;24(4):695-700. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.695.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11315833 (View on PubMed)

Wang SJ, Middleton B, Prosser LA, Bardon CG, Spurr CD, Carchidi PJ, Kittler AF, Goldszer RC, Fairchild DG, Sussman AJ, Kuperman GJ, Bates DW. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003 Apr 1;114(5):397-403. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00057-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12714130 (View on PubMed)

Whitten PS, Mair FS, Haycox A, May CR, Williams TL, Hellmich S. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ. 2002 Jun 15;324(7351):1434-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1434.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12065269 (View on PubMed)

Wickramasinghe, N., Levitan, N., Vandenbosch, B., (1998) University Hospitals Automation, Prentice Hall Case Series in M.I.S.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Yang, H., Vandenbosch, B., (1998) Visibility as the Basis of a Framework for Identifying Strategic Information Systems, Journal of Information Technology Management, Vol. 9/2, 31-42.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

51760

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

51760

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.