Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
350 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-11-01
2018-11-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. The Diabetes Engagement and Activation Platform (DEAP) can be integrated into primary care workflow to facilitate the care of patients with type 2 diabetes.
2. The DEAP intervention will be feasible and acceptable to patients with type 2 diabetes.
3. The DEAP intervention will enhance patient activation and improve type 2 diabetes self management and glucose control
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Effectiveness of Primary Care-Delivered Telehealth Interventions to Manage Type 2 Diabetes in People With Physical Disabilities and Multiple Chronic Conditions
NCT07032844
Clinic to Community Navigation to Improve Diabetes Outcomes
NCT03474731
The Use of a Computer Program to Help Primary Care Providers Treat Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01648244
Using Remote Monitoring to Address Health Disparities in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT06517576
Use of a Computer-Assisted Decision Support (CADS) System in Management of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01382264
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Sub-aim 1.1: Measure the proportion of clinicians and care team members who engage patients through the DEAP intervention as well as the types of patient support activities they address; assess the representativeness of participating clinicians and care team members in relation to all practice staff; and assess how they integrated DEAP into the care of type 2 diabetes patients.
* Sub-aim 1.2: Assess how practices redesign workflow, overcome barriers, and enhance facilitators in order to integrate DEAP.
* Sub-aim 1.3: Determine processes for sustaining DEAP beyond the project funding period .
Aim 2: To compare, relative to usual care, the effectiveness of the DEAP intervention.
* Sub Aim 2.1: Measure the proportion and representativeness of eligible patients who choose to enroll; access the DEAP curriculum; complete the DEAP curriculum; and contact care team members. .
* Sub Aim 2.2: Compare the change in the average glycosylated hemoglobin (primary outcome), Body Mass Index, systolic blood pressure, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) medications and patient activation (secondary outcomes) from baseline to 3 months and from 3 to 6 months for patients randomized to DEAP versus usual care.
Sub Aim 2.3: Assess the clarity, readability and acceptability of the DEAP curricula materials for T2D patients enrolled in the intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Behavioral self-management
Eligible patients who are registered on the practice EHR linked portal will be invited to join the study. Following informed consent, enrollment and randomization, participants in the treatment group will receive the type 2 diabetes behavioral self-management education intervention; comprised of 9 modules derived from Medline Plus.
Usual Care
Patients will not be given the intervention but receive usual care for T2D.
Usual Care
Usual care includes whatever care and services the patient's clinical provides as well as generic type 2 diabetes education built into the patient's EHR linked portal.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Usual Care
Patients will not be given the intervention but receive usual care for T2D.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English speaking;
* Enrolled in the practice EHR linked patient portal.
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-English speaking;
* Patients not enrolled in the practice EHR linked patient portal;
* Under 18 and over 75 years of age.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Virginia Commonwealth University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexander H Krist, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Virginia Commonwealth University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sabo R, Robins J, Lutz S, Kashiri P, Day T, Webel B, Krist A. Diabetes Engagement and Activation Platform for Implementation and Effectiveness of Automated Virtual Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Education: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Mar 29;6(1):e26621. doi: 10.2196/26621.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HM20008890
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.