Efficacy And Safety Of Dysport In The Treatment Of Upper Limb Spasticity In Children

NCT ID: NCT02106351

Last Updated: 2022-09-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

212 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-09-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of Dysport used in the treatment of upper limb spasticity (altered skeletal muscle performance) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Limb Spasticity (Altered Skeletal Muscle Performance) in Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Group A - Treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4: Dysport 16 Units (U)/kg in one upper extremity (the study limb).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Botulinum toxin type A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subjects randomised to receive Dysport 2 U/kg, 8 U/kg or 16 U/kg administered intramuscularly in the study limb.

Group B

Group B - Treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4: Dysport 8 U/kg in one upper extremity (the study limb).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Botulinum toxin type A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subjects randomised to receive Dysport 2 U/kg, 8 U/kg or 16 U/kg administered intramuscularly in the study limb.

Group C

Group C - Treatment 1: Dysport 2 U/kg in one upper extremity (the study limb).

Group C - Treatments 2, 3 and 4: Dysport 8 or 16 U/kg in one upper extremity (the study limb).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Botulinum toxin type A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subjects randomised to receive Dysport 2 U/kg, 8 U/kg or 16 U/kg administered intramuscularly in the study limb.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Botulinum toxin type A

Subjects randomised to receive Dysport 2 U/kg, 8 U/kg or 16 U/kg administered intramuscularly in the study limb.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Upper limb spasticity due to cerebral palsy
* Body weight 10 kg or over
* MAS score of 2 or more in affected elbow or wrist flexors

Exclusion Criteria

* Fixed myocontracture
* Previous phenol or alcohol injection within 1 year
* Severe athetoid or dystonic movements
* Previous or planned surgery for spasticity in elbow or wrist flexors
* Neuromuscular disorders
* Previous Rhizotomy within 6 months
* Intrathecal baclofen within 30 days
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ipsen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ipsen Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ipsen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico

Site Status

Celaya, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Wiązowna, , Poland

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Terrassa, , Spain

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kocaeli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Czechia Israel Mexico Poland Spain Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Delgado MR, Tilton A, Carranza-Del Rio J, Dursun N, Bonikowski M, Aydin R, Maciag-Tymecka I, Oleszek J, Dabrowski E, Grandoulier AS, Picaut P; Dysport in PUL study group. Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA for upper limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized repeat-treatment study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 May;63(5):592-600. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14733. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33206382 (View on PubMed)

Shierk A, Jimenez-Moreno AC, Roberts H, Ackerman-Laufer S, Backer G, Bard-Pondarre R, Cekmece C, Pyrzanowska W, Vilain C, Delgado MR. Development of a Pediatric Goal-Centered Upper Limb Spasticity Home Exercise Therapy Program for Use in a Phase-III Trial of Abobotulinumtoxina (Dysport(R)). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(2):124-135. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2018.1486346. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30204515 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-021817-22

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Y-52-52120-153

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dysport for the Treatment of OMD
NCT01921270 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2