A Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Dysport® and Botox® in Adults With Upper Limb Spasticity.

NCT ID: NCT04936542

Last Updated: 2025-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

464 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-23

Study Completion Date

2025-08-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is aiming to demonstrate the non-inferiority of AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) versus OnabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) as the primary safety endpoint, and the superiority of aboBoNT-A over onaBoNT-A with respect to duration of response as the key secondary efficacy endpoint when used at optimal doses according to approved prescribing information of each product.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Limb Spasticity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sequence 1

Participants will receive one cycle of aboBoNT-A followed by one cycle of onaBoNT-A in the selected overactive upper limb muscles

Group Type OTHER

AboBoNT-A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

AbobotulinumtoxinA for injection: 500 Unit vial. Dose: 900 Units (3.6 mL)

OnaBoNT-A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

OnabotulinumtoxinA for injection: 200 Unit vial. Dose: 360 Units (3.6 mL)

Sequence 2

Participants will receive one cycle of onaBoNT-A followed by one cycle of aboBoNT-A in the selected overactive upper limb muscles

Group Type OTHER

AboBoNT-A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

AbobotulinumtoxinA for injection: 500 Unit vial. Dose: 900 Units (3.6 mL)

OnaBoNT-A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

OnabotulinumtoxinA for injection: 200 Unit vial. Dose: 360 Units (3.6 mL)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AboBoNT-A

AbobotulinumtoxinA for injection: 500 Unit vial. Dose: 900 Units (3.6 mL)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

OnaBoNT-A

OnabotulinumtoxinA for injection: 200 Unit vial. Dose: 360 Units (3.6 mL)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dysport® Botox®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participant must be 18 to 80 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent
* 2a. \[US/France\] Participants with stable Upper Limb Spasticity (ULS) for at least 3 months, in whom treatment of only one upper limb is necessary for the duration of the study;
* 2b. \[Canada\] Participants with stable post-stroke ULS for at least 3 months, in whom treatment of only one upper limb is necessary for the duration of the study
* Participants who are either naïve to Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) for ULS or who have been previously treated with BoNT-A for ULS;
* Participants with MAS score of at least 2 at two muscle groups (one of these two muscles groups should be the PTMG) and at least 1 in the remaining muscle group.
* Participants with DAS score of at least 2 on the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) (one of four functional domains: dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain);
* Participants who require BoNT-A injection in all of the following muscles: flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, flexor digitorum profundus, flexor digitorum superficialis and biceps brachii;
* Participants for whom injection of a total dose of 900 Units aboBoNT-A or 360 Units onaBoNT-A is considered by the investigator to be clinically appropriate;
* Participants who have been stable for at least 3 months prior to study entry in terms of oral antispasticity, anticoagulant and/or anticholinergic medication if treated are considered by the investigator likely to remain stable for the duration of the study;

Exclusion Criteria

* Major limitations in the passive range of motion in the paretic upper limb;
* Major neurological impairment (other than limb paresis) that could negatively affect functional performance;
* Participants clinically requiring injection into any upper limb muscles other than the five muscles of one arm listed in Section 5.1, or requiring injection into both arms or any lower limb within the timeframe of the study;
* Hypersensitivity to any BoNT product or excipients;
* Hypersensitivity to cow's milk protein (casein);
* Infection at the proposed injection site(s);
* Known peripheral motor neuropathic diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or neuromuscular junction disorders (e.g. myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome);
* Any medical condition (including dysphagia or breathing difficulties/compromised respiratory function) that in the opinion of the investigator, might jeopardize the participant's safety;
* Women who are pregnant or lactating
* Participants treated with BoNT of any type for any indication (e.g. bladder injection, headache or cosmetic) within the previous 12 weeks or planned/likely to be treated during the course of the study;
* Prior history of non-responsiveness to BoNT treatment;
* Previous surgery, or administration of alcohol or phenol in the study limb 6 months or earlier from study enrolment or planned/likely to be treated during the course of the study;
* Participants treated with intrathecal baclofen (except if treatment has reached a stable dose for \>4 weeks and is likely to remain stable throughout the study), aminoglycosides or other agents interfering with neuromuscular transmission (e.g. curare-like agents) within the 4 weeks prior to study enrolment or planned/likely to be treated during the course of the study
* BoNT naïve participants with a history of facial neurogenic disorder (facial paralysis, polyradiculoneuropathy) (only for France).
* Participants receiving concomitant medication treatment with the following PT/OT interventions on the study limb: new splinting/orthotics/casting, serial casting, shockwave therapy, dry needling and needle tenotomies. However, PT/OT interventions not intended to reduce study limb spasticity (e.g. functional training exercises) or with a transient (\<1 day) reduction of study limb spasticity (e.g. stretching, weight bearing) are allowed.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ipsen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ipsen Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ipsen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

HonorHealth Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Movement Disorders Center of Arizona

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

The University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center (RLANRC) - Neurology

Downey, California, United States

Site Status

Parkinson's & Movement Disorders Institute

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Neuro-Pain Medical Center

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda University Health Care

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Southland Neurologic Institute

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

University of California Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Hasbani And Hasbani Medical Group

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Ki Health Partners LLC D/B/A New England Institute for Clinical Research

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

First Choice Neurology

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

James A Haley Veterans Hospital

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida Health-Morsani Center for Advanced Healthcare

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University of School of Medicine

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Hawaii Pacific Neuroscience

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Shirley Ryan Ability Lab

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Fort Wayne Neurological Center

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Kansas City Bone and Joint Clinic, P.A. (KCBJ) - Overland Pa

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

LSU Healthcare network

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

UMass Memorial Medical Center - University Campus

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont Hospital

Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Medical Rehabilitation Group, PC

Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Beaumont Hospital, Grosse Pointe

Grosse Pointe, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan Center of Medical Research

Grosse Pointe, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Rusk Rehabilitation Center

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Wr-Crcn, Llc

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Cooper University Health Care

Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medicine Clinical and Translational Science Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

North Suffolk Neurology

Port Jefferson, New York, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital

Schenectady, New York, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic - Neurological Institute

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

MossRehab - Einstein Medical Center

Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Penn State Health Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Neurology

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Aether Medicine

Wayne, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Siskin Hospital for Rehabilitation - Neurology

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

The Vanderbilt Clinic

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

TIRR Memorial Hermann Research Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

UT Health San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Institute for Neurological Disorders

Sherman, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah School of Medicine

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Carilion Clinic Institute of Orthopaedics and Neurosciences

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

MedStar National Rehabilitation Network

Columbia, Washington, United States

Site Status

Swedish Neuroscience Institute

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin - Froedtert Hospital

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Lawson Health Research Institute

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Moncton Hospital

Moncton, , Canada

Site Status

Genge Partners

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Victoria General Hospital

Victoria, , Canada

Site Status

Centre Les Capucins

Angers, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Pellegrin CHU Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Hopital Sud

Échirolles, , France

Site Status

Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Laveran

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint-Jacques (CHU Nantes)

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Hopital Archet (CHU de Nice)

Nice, , France

Site Status

Hopital Fernand Widal

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation Fonction

Ploemeur, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Jean Bernard (CHU Poitiers)

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Pontchaillou (CHU Rennes)

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Pole Saint Helier

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Centre de Perharidy

Roscoff, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Amand-les-Eaux

Saint-Amand-les-Eaux, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Saint Amand Montrond

Saint-Amand-Montrond, , France

Site Status

Hopital Henry Gabrielle (HCL)

Saint-Genis-Laval, , France

Site Status

Hopitaux Universitaires De Strasbourg

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Hopital de Rangueil

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

University of Puerto Rico

Santurce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada France Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Esquenazi A, Ayyoub Z, Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Maisonobe P, Otto J, Patel AT. AbobotulinumtoxinA Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA in Adults with Upper Limb Spasticity: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study Protocol. Adv Ther. 2021 Nov;38(11):5623-5633. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01896-3. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34562231 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-000161-32

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CLIN-52120-452

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.