A Randomised, Cross-over, Double-blind, Sham-Controlled Superiority Trial of UltraSound-Guided Versus Non-Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum TOxin Injections in Cervical DYstonia [CUSTODY]
NCT ID: NCT07233993
Last Updated: 2025-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-01
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Do ultrasound-guided BoNT injections improve quality of life more than injections without ultrasound?
* Are ultrasound-guided injections as safe as injections without ultrasound?
Researchers will compare:
* BoNT injections with ultrasound guidance
* BoNT injections without ultrasound guidance (based only on body landmarks)
Participants will:
* Receive both types of injections during the study (one first, then the other)
* Complete questionnaires about quality of life, movement, pain, and mood
* Attend follow-up visits over about 8 months About 37 adults with cervical dystonia will take part. The study will take place at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta in Milan, Italy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Targeting Methods of Botulinum Toxin Injections for Cervical Dystonia
NCT03946046
Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Patients With Cervical Dystonia
NCT00564681
Efficacy and Safety of MEDITOXIN® in Cervical Dystonia
NCT03905304
Assessing Cervical Dystonia
NCT03587350
Clinical and Kinematic Assessment for Determination of Botox® Injection Parameters in Cervical Dystonia
NCT02662530
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The established treatment for CD is repeated intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), usually every 12 to 16 weeks. BoNT-A blocks acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction, producing a temporary and reversible chemodenervation of the target muscle. Clinical benefit generally appears within a few days, peaks after 2 to 4 weeks, and gradually wears off after 3 to 4 months, requiring repeated injections. Although this therapy is effective and safe, its clinical success largely depends on the accuracy of muscle targeting. Suboptimal precision in injections can lead to unsatisfactory outcomes, persistence of symptoms, or treatment discontinuation.
Several approaches are used in clinical practice to guide injections. The conventional method relies on palpation and anatomical landmarks, is widely available, and requires limited resources. However, it depends heavily on the injector's experience and may result in inaccurate targeting. Ultrasound (US) guidance, on the other hand, allows direct, real-time visualisation of the cervical muscles and adjacent structures. This technique may increase accuracy, optimise toxin distribution, and lower the risk of misplaced injections and adverse events.
Cadaveric studies have demonstrated higher accuracy of US-guided injections compared with landmark-based methods, and preliminary clinical studies suggest that US guidance may improve outcomes. However, these studies have been limited by small sample sizes, lack of randomisation, or non-blinded assessments. Robust evidence from randomised controlled trials is still lacking, and therefore the clinical superiority of US guided injectionsance remains uncertain.
US-guided injections also require additional equipment, time, and operator training. This may limit their widespread adoption in routine clinical practice unless a clear advantage over landmark-based injections is demonstrated. Addressing this knowledge gap is essential to inform clinical decisions and optimise the management of CD.
The present study has been designed to evaluate the impact of US-guided BoNT-A injections compared with injections based only on anatomical landmarks in adults with idiopathic CD. The primary objective is to determine whether US guidance provides superior improvements in quality of life. Secondary objectives include assessing the effects of the two techniques on motor and non-motor symptoms, as well as comparing their safety.
A total of approximately 37 participants with idiopathic cervical dystonia and a documented good response to prior BoNT-A therapy will be recruited at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta in Milan, Italy. Each participant will undergo two treatment cycles, one with US guidance and one without, in randomised order. The duration of participation for each individual will be about 8 months. By directly comparing two widely used approaches, this trial will provide high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice and improve care for people with cervical dystonia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ultrasound-Guided BoNT Injections
Participants receive botulinum toxin type A injections into cervical muscles using real-time ultrasound guidance to visualise target muscles and surrounding structures
Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection
Botulinum toxin type A is injected into dystonic cervical muscles under real-time ultrasound guidance, allowing visualisation of target muscles and adjacent structures. Injections are performed according to standard clinical practice with a stable dose and scheme
Non-ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection
Botulinum toxin type A is injected into dystonic cervical muscles using anatomical landmarks, without ultrasound guidance. To maintain blinding, the ultrasound device is present in all procedures, but the screen is turned off in this arm. Injections are performed according to standard clinical practice with a stable dose and scheme
Non-Ultrasound-Guided BoNT Injections
Participants receive botulinum toxin type A injections into cervical muscles using anatomical landmarks, without ultrasound guidance. The ultrasound device is present but the screen is turned off to maintain blinding.
Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection
Botulinum toxin type A is injected into dystonic cervical muscles under real-time ultrasound guidance, allowing visualisation of target muscles and adjacent structures. Injections are performed according to standard clinical practice with a stable dose and scheme
Non-ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection
Botulinum toxin type A is injected into dystonic cervical muscles using anatomical landmarks, without ultrasound guidance. To maintain blinding, the ultrasound device is present in all procedures, but the screen is turned off in this arm. Injections are performed according to standard clinical practice with a stable dose and scheme
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection
Botulinum toxin type A is injected into dystonic cervical muscles under real-time ultrasound guidance, allowing visualisation of target muscles and adjacent structures. Injections are performed according to standard clinical practice with a stable dose and scheme
Non-ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection
Botulinum toxin type A is injected into dystonic cervical muscles using anatomical landmarks, without ultrasound guidance. To maintain blinding, the ultrasound device is present in all procedures, but the screen is turned off in this arm. Injections are performed according to standard clinical practice with a stable dose and scheme
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of Idiopathic Cervical Dystonia
* On a stable dose of other medications (if any) used for focal dystonia treatment (e.g. anticholinergics and benzodiazepines) for at least 3 months prior to screening and expected to be maintained throughout the study
* Treatment non-naïve to BoNT type A therapy for CD
* At least 4 months have passed between the last BoNT injection at screening
* Good clinical response to previous BoNT injections, on stable dosing and treatment scheme
* Informed Consent as documented by signature.
* Ability to perform study requirements (to attend assessment and treatments)
Exclusion Criteria
* Concomitant diagnosis of diseases that contraindicate the use of botulinum toxin, such as myasthenia gravis
* Known hypersensitivity or allergy to Botulinum-A Toxin
* Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
* Intention to become pregnant during the study
* Lack of safe contraception
* Other clinically significant and unstable concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, etc.).
* Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g., due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
* Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study
* Previous enrolment into the current study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, Delong MR, Fahn S, Fung VS, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Jinnah HA, Klein C, Lang AE, Mink JW, Teller JK. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):863-73. doi: 10.1002/mds.25475. Epub 2013 May 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CUSTODY
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.