Long-term Outcome of DBS Versus Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Cervical Dystonia
NCT ID: NCT04432285
Last Updated: 2023-12-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-08-06
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators will compare this DBS-treated cohort with an age- and gender matched group of CD patients who are receiving the standard treatment with botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections and have been treated for at least 3 years as well. The investigators hypothesize that the DBS-treated group will have a significantly lower burden of symptoms at long-term follow-up than the BoNT treated group.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Long-term outcome of pallidal DBS in cervical dystonia has only been published in some smaller series. In a prospective, single-center study with blinded outcome assessments of eight CD patients, an average improvement of 70% in the Severity score of the TWSTRS , and 91% and 92% improvement, respectively, in the Disability and Pain scores, was found at median 30 months follow-up (Skogseid IM et al, 2012). The two largest unblinded series showed average improvements of TWSTRS Severity score of 55 % and 58 %, at mean follow-up 32 months (n=10), and 2 years (n=6), respectively (Hung SW et al, 2007, Cacciola F et al, 2010).
Although these studies are promising, there is a lack of documentation of outcome of GPi-DBS in CD beyond 3 years of treatment and in larger patient materials. Also, studies are lacking that compare the severity of remaining CD symptoms and disease-specific quality of life between a long-term treated DBS-cohort and a cohort receiving long-term BoNT treatment.
The investigators will therefore perform a cross-sectional, observational study of patients who were operated at Oslo University Hospital with a Medtronic DBS-device targeting the GPi bilaterally from 2004 to 2017, and who have been treated with chronic GPi-DBS for a minimum of 3 years and up to 13 years. The main objective is to assess remaining CD severity and CD-related Quality of Life (QoL) in this DBS-treated group and compare this with an age- and gender matched group of CD-patients treated with BoNT-injections for a minimum of 3 years (BoNT-group).
The main outcome measures are the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), with its three subscores: Severity, Disability and Pain, and the Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 (CDIP-58), which is a self-rated questionnaire for disease-specific quality of life. The primary endpoint of the study is the difference in TWSTRS total score between the two treatment groups at the time of long-term follow-up. The BoNT-group will be assessed with TWSTRS both before and 4-6 weeks after the last injection, but the score 4-6 weeks after injection will be used for comparison with the DBS-group. In the DBS-group the TWSTRS total and subscores obtained at long-term evaluation will also be compared to the scores which were obtained prior to the operation as part of the routine work-up. Secondary endpoints are TWSTRS Severity, Disability and Pain score, and CDIP-58 Total scores. Exploratory variables are the eight Symptom/Domain scores of the CDIP-58 and Visual Analog Scale for Global Burden of Disease (VAS-GBD), at long-term follow-up. Other outcome variables are complications and severe adverse events of the two treatment types, and the Anxiety and Depression scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
The investigators hypothesize that the DBS-treated group will have a significantly lower mean TWSTRS total score at long-term follow-up than the BoNT treated group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Deep Brain Stimulation (GPi-DBS)
Patients with cervical dystonia (CD) who were operated at Oslo University Hospital between June 2004 and December 2017 with a DBS-device targeting the GPi bilaterally, and who have been treated with chronic GPi-DBS for a minimum of 3 years.
DBS-device, implanted in GPi bilaterally
Chronic/continuous bilateral GPi-DBS
Botulinum toxin treatment
CD patients who for a minimum of 3 years have received treatment with botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections at regular intervals (minimum 12 injection cycles) and still are receiving them (Age- and gender matched to the GPi-DBS group)
Botulinum toxin
Repeated intramuscular injections at regular intervals of around 3 months
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DBS-device, implanted in GPi bilaterally
Chronic/continuous bilateral GPi-DBS
Botulinum toxin
Repeated intramuscular injections at regular intervals of around 3 months
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BoNT-group: Patients who are receiving regular BoNT-injections at Oslo University Hospital for isolated cervical dystonia (focal or part of segmental dystonia), who are gender-and age-matched to the operated patients, and who give their informed consent to participate in this follow-up study.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Inger Marie Skogseid
Consultant neurologist, Project leader
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Inger Marie Skogseid, MDPhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Oslo University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Oslo University Hospital, homepage for Movement Disorders Research Group/Inger Marie Skogseid
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
96307
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id