Dysport® Adult Upper Limb Spasticity Extension Study

NCT ID: NCT01313312

Last Updated: 2022-09-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

258 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with upper limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a phase III, multicentre, prospective, open label, repeat treatment cycles, extension to the double study Y-52-52120-145 (Study 145) . The study included both rollover subjects from Study 145 and de novo subjects. The primary study objective was to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with upper limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles. The secondary study objective was to assess the long term efficacy of repeated treatment with Dysport®.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nervous System Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Total Dysport®

A total of 254 subjects in the open label study received between 1 and 5 intramuscular (i.m) injections of Dysport® according to their individual needs, for a period of up to 12 months. All subjects were administered an appropriate dosage of Dysport® (1000 Units \[U\] or 500 U) on Day 1 of treatment Cycle 1. At each study visit from Week 12 onwards, subjects were assessed to determine whether a subsequent treatment cycle was required and treatment cycles were administered at intervals of a minimum of 12 weeks apart depending on the subject's safety and efficacy response. From Cycle 2 onwards, a total dose of 1500 U could be administered in subjects requiring treatment with Dysport® in their shoulder and other upper limb muscles. Subjects who showed improvement in their upper limb during the first two treatment cycles were able to receive concomitant injections of Dysport® 500 U into at least one calf muscle, from Cycle 3 onwards as long as the total dose did not exceed 1500 U.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Botulinum toxin type A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Dysport® was supplied to the study centres in vials containing 500 U of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). Depending on the dose administered up to 3 vials were required for the injection.

Each vial was reconstituted with sodium chloride for injection (0.9%). A total volume of 5.0 mL of the reconstituted product was injected for Dysport® 500 U and 1000 U, and 7.5 mL was injected for Dysport® 1500 U.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Botulinum toxin type A

Dysport® was supplied to the study centres in vials containing 500 U of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). Depending on the dose administered up to 3 vials were required for the injection.

Each vial was reconstituted with sodium chloride for injection (0.9%). A total volume of 5.0 mL of the reconstituted product was injected for Dysport® 500 U and 1000 U, and 7.5 mL was injected for Dysport® 1500 U.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Completion of the double blind study, Y-52-52120-145

Exclusion Criteria

* Major limitation in the passive range of motion in upper limb
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ipsen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ipsen Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ipsen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center

Downey, California, United States

Site Status

Associated Neurologist of Southern CT, PT

Fairfield, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Parkinson's Disease & Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Design Neuroscience Miami

South Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medical College

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Univ of North Carolina - Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas University of Texas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of North Texas HSC at Ben Hogan Center

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah School of Medicine

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Université catholique de Louvain av Hippocrate 10

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinique Universitaire

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Charles University in Prague

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

CHU Brest

Brest, , France

Site Status

Centre de Réadaptation de Coubert

Coubert, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Albert Chenevier-Hopital Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Hopital Raymond Poincarré

Garches, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Sébastopol

Reims, , France

Site Status

CHU Strasbourg

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Hopital Rangueil

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Petz Aladar County Hospital

Gyor, Budapest, Hungary

Site Status

National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Azienda Hospedaliero

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Krakowska Akademia Neurologii

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Medical Rehabilitation Center

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Scientific Center of Neurology of RAMS

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

State University

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Derer's Hospital

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Czechia France Hungary Italy Poland Russia Slovakia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Delafont B, Carroll K, Vilain C, Pham E. Investigation of mixed model repeated measures analyses and non-linear random coefficient models in the context of long-term efficacy data. Pharm Stat. 2018 Sep;17(5):515-526. doi: 10.1002/pst.1868. Epub 2018 May 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29781237 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-019162-83

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Y-52-52120-148

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.