Botulinum Toxin Type A (BT-A) in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain Versus Steroid

NCT ID: NCT01473277

Last Updated: 2011-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to confirm the efficacy and safety of the intra-articular injection of BT-A in a multicentric double blind randomised study. For this purpose intra-articular injection of BT-A will be compared with the intra-articular steroid injection that is the current "gold standard" for the treatment of HSP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Shoulder pain is one of the most common complications of stroke. In fact, it occurs up to 70% of stroke victims. Post-stroke shoulder pain impacts negatively on daily activities. Moreover, it interferes with the rehabilitation process, is related to poor quality of life and has been associated to a worse outcome and to prolonged hospitalization.The aetiology of post-stroke HSP is uncertain, although it has been associated with various factors: joint disorders, capsulitis adhesive, subluxation of the head of the humerus, rotator cuff tendons injuries and spasticity of surrounding muscles. Clinicians use a wide variety of approaches to treat post-stroke HSP, although none has yet been proven effective. Correct positioning and careful handling of the hemiplegic limb are believed to prevent HSP. Physiotherapy alone does not seem to be effective for this complication. Capsulitis adhesive can be successfully treated with corticosteroid injections in the shoulder. However, despite many randomized controlled trials of corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain, their effects remain controversial. The large number of interventions and the lack of consensus about their effectiveness suggest that the aetiology is poorly understood and hence its treatment remains to be established. Intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) have also been demonstrated to reduce HSP. The mechanism whereby intramuscular inoculation of BT-A reduces pain may include a muscle relaxant effect and inhibition of the release of neurotransmitters by sensory neurons. Nevertheless, this approach has some limitations: it is probably more effective in muscular than in articular pain and it may be influenced by the muscles affected and site of injection. Intra-articular injection of BT-A has recently proven safe and effective in the treatment of refractory joint shoulder pain caused by chronic arthritis. The mechanisms by which it exerts this effect are not known, but could include inhibition of the release of pain peptides from nerve terminals and sensory ganglia, and anti-inflammatory and anti-glutaminergic effects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Hemiparesis Shoulder Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Hemiplegic shoulder pain Botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) Steroid Intra-articular injection Pain score of 45 or greater on a 0-100 mm VAS Duration of HSP for at least one month Pain refractoriness to conventional treatment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BT-A (Dysport 500U)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

BT-A (Dysport 500U), Triamcinolone acetonide

Intervention Type DRUG

All patients will be randomize to receive an intra-articular injection of BT-A (Dysport 500U) or triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg). Both drugs will be reconstituted with 2.0 ml of saline. Both drugs will be injected in the glenohumeral joint with a standard posterior approach. The time of the intra-articular injection od BT-A or steroid will be considered the "time zero" for each patient. The primary and secondary efficacy variables will be evaluated in all patients at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment.

Triamcinolone acetonide

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

BT-A (Dysport 500U), Triamcinolone acetonide

Intervention Type DRUG

All patients will be randomize to receive an intra-articular injection of BT-A (Dysport 500U) or triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg). Both drugs will be reconstituted with 2.0 ml of saline. Both drugs will be injected in the glenohumeral joint with a standard posterior approach. The time of the intra-articular injection od BT-A or steroid will be considered the "time zero" for each patient. The primary and secondary efficacy variables will be evaluated in all patients at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BT-A (Dysport 500U), Triamcinolone acetonide

All patients will be randomize to receive an intra-articular injection of BT-A (Dysport 500U) or triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg). Both drugs will be reconstituted with 2.0 ml of saline. Both drugs will be injected in the glenohumeral joint with a standard posterior approach. The time of the intra-articular injection od BT-A or steroid will be considered the "time zero" for each patient. The primary and secondary efficacy variables will be evaluated in all patients at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the treatment.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with hemiparesis and shoulder pain due to first stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) admitted in a rehabilitative department to carry out a standard post-acute rehabilitative program
* Pain score of 45 or greater on a 0-100 mm pain visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain)
* Duration of HSP for at least one month
* Pain refractoriness to conventional treatment i.e. common analgesics (such as paracetamol and NSAIDs), slings, strapping and handling of the arm, functional electrical stimulation of shoulder muscles

Exclusion Criteria

* Significant spasticity in the upper shoulder joint, defined as a score of 2 or more at the modified Ashworth scale
* History of shoulder pain or shoulder diseases.
* History of neurological diseases (i.e. Parkinson disease, dystonia).
* History of botulinum toxin treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ospedale di Brunico

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Università degli Studi di Ferrara

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Foundation Institute San Raffaele G. Giglio of Cefalù

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Giuseppe Galardi

Direttore Unità Operativa di Riabilitazione

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giuseppe Galardi, Dr

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

San Raffaele-Giglio Foundation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondazione Istituto San Raffaele G. Giglio di Cefalù

Cefalù, Palermo, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Giuseppe Galardi, Dr

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +39 0921 920357

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-004682-32

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id