ADDRESS - Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Spinal Deformity

NCT ID: NCT02058238

Last Updated: 2020-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-03

Study Completion Date

2015-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To quantify potential short- and long-term benefits of robotically-guided minimally invasive (MIS) or open-approach spine surgery in adult patients undergoing multi-level spinal instrumentation surgery, in comparison to image- or navigation-guided instrumentation in a matching cohort of control patients, performed using a freehand technique, both in MIS and open approaches.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Scoliosis Kyphosis Kyphoscoliosis Spinal Deformity Spondylosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: Robotic-guided, Open approach

Adult patients (age\> 21 years) undergoing long (\>4 consecutive vertebrae) open instrumentation, correction and fusion surgery in the thoracic, lumbar or sacral spine for a kypho/scoliotic curve, sagittal or coronal imbalance or a combination of these.

No interventions assigned to this group

Arm 2: control-arm - non-robotic, open approach

Adult patients (age\> 21 years) undergoing long (\>4 consecutive vertebrae) open instrumentation, correction and fusion surgery in the thoracic, lumbar or sacral spine for a kypho/scoliotic curve, sagittal or coronal imbalance or a combination of these.

No interventions assigned to this group

Arm 3: robotic-guided, MIS approach

Adult patients (age\> 21 years) undergoing long (\>4 consecutive vertebrae) open instrumentation, correction and fusion surgery in the thoracic, lumbar or sacral spine for a kypho/scoliotic curve, sagittal or coronal imbalance or a combination of these.

No interventions assigned to this group

Arm 4: control-arm - freehand, MIS approach

Adult patients (age\> 21 years) undergoing long (\>4 consecutive vertebrae) open instrumentation, correction and fusion surgery in the thoracic, lumbar or sacral spine for a kypho/scoliotic curve, sagittal or coronal imbalance or a combination of these.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult patients (age 21 years and older), undergoing long (5 consecutive vertebrae or more) spinal fusion surgery, between T1 to the sacrum.
2. Cases may include surgeries involving iliac screws (e.g., Galveston technique or S2AI screws) although these screws will not be included in the data analysis.
3. Cases may include augmented cases (when one or more of the screws are inserted into vertebrae after a vertebral augmentation procedure, such as kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty).
4. Patient capable of complying with study requirements
5. Signed informed consent by patient

Exclusion Criteria

1. Infection or malignancy
2. Primary abnormalities of bones (e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta)
3. Primary muscle diseases, such as muscular dystrophy
4. Neurologic diseases (e.g. Charcot-Marie Tooth, Guillain-Barre syndrome, cerebral palsy, spina bifida, or neurofibroma)
5. Spinal cord abnormalities with any neurologic symptoms or signs
6. Spinal cord lesions requiring neurosurgical interventions, such as hydromyelia
7. Paraplegia
8. Patients who have participated in a research study involving an investigational product in the 12 weeks prior to surgery
9. Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study.
10. Pregnancy
11. Patient cannot follow study protocol, for any reason
12. Patient cannot or will not sign informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mazor Robotics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Doron Dinstein, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mazor Robotics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Use of an ultrasonic osteotome device in spine surgery: experience from the first 128 patients. Eur Spine J. 2013 Dec;22(12):2845-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2780-y. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23584231 (View on PubMed)

Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, Pfeiffer M, Horne D, Silberstein B, Hardenbrook M, Kiriyanthan G, Barzilay Y, Bruskin A, Sackerer D, Alexandrovsky V, Stuer C, Burger R, Maeurer J, Donald GD, Schoenmayr R, Friedlander A, Knoller N, Schmieder K, Pechlivanis I, Kim IS, Meyer B, Shoham M. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 15;35(24):2109-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d323ab.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21079498 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLN105

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lumbar Fusion With Porous Versus Non-Porous Cages
NCT05583864 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Surgical Trial
NCT02076113 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Function and Scoliosis Surgery
NCT02237248 COMPLETED
Restore CLINICAL TRIAL
NCT01609374 UNKNOWN NA
ESP Block in MIS Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT05856539 RECRUITING NA