MIS ReFRESH: Robotic vs. Freehand Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries
NCT ID: NCT02057744
Last Updated: 2019-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
600 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-10-31
2020-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ADDRESS - Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Spinal Deformity
NCT02058238
Clinical Trial of Minimally Invasive Robotic Spine Surgery
NCT02121249
Clinical Evidence of Robot Guided vs. Navigated vs. Free Hand Lumbar Spinal Fusion
NCT02998060
Prospective Evaluation of Complex Adult Spinal Deformity (CAD) Treated With Minimally Invasive Surgery
NCT04885244
Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
NCT01045473
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robotic-guided
Adult patients (21 years or older) undergoing short (4 or less consecutive vertebrae) thoracic, lumbar or lumbosacral percutaneous/minimally invasive robotic-guided spinal fixation surgery.
No interventions assigned to this group
Freehand image-guided
Adult patients (21 years or older) undergoing short (4 or less consecutive vertebrae) thoracic, lumbar or lumbosacral percutaneous/minimally invasive image-guided freehand or navigated spinal fixation surgery.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. May include surgeries involving iliac screws, although these screws will not be included in the data analysis.
3. Primary fusion surgery
4. Patient capable of complying with study requirements
5. Signed informed consent by patient
Exclusion Criteria
2. Revision surgery (prior laminectomy or discectomy is not excluded).
3. Infection or malignancy
4. Primary abnormalities of bones (e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta)
5. Primary muscle diseases, such as muscular dystrophy
6. Neurologic diseases (e.g. Charcot-Marie Tooth, Guillain-Barre syndrome, cerebral palsy, spina bifida or neurofibroma)
7. Spinal cord abnormalities with any neurologic symptoms or signs
8. Spinal cord lesions requiring neurosurgical interventions, such as hydromyelia
9. Paraplegia
10. Patients who have participated in a research study involving an investigational product in the 12 weeks prior to surgery
11. Patients requiring anterior release or instrumentation
12. Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study.
13. Patient cannot follow study protocol, for any reason
14. Patient cannot or will not sign informed consent
21 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mazor Robotics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Doron Dinstein, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Mazor Robotics, Ltd
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Florida Hospital Celebration Health
Celebration, Florida, United States
Baptist Health
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Central Florida Neurosurgery Institute
Orlando, Florida, United States
Southeastern Spine Center & Research Institute
Sarasota, Florida, United States
The Rothman Institute
Abington, Pennsylvania, United States
Tabor Orthopedics
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Atlantic Brain & Spine
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Virginia Spine Institute
Reston, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, Pfeiffer M, Horne D, Silberstein B, Hardenbrook M, Kiriyanthan G, Barzilay Y, Bruskin A, Sackerer D, Alexandrovsky V, Stuer C, Burger R, Maeurer J, Donald GD, Schoenmayr R, Friedlander A, Knoller N, Schmieder K, Pechlivanis I, Kim IS, Meyer B, Shoham M. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 15;35(24):2109-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d323ab.
Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, Giese A, Rohde V. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):860-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1729-2. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients. Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22(3):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2499-1. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLN110
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.