Prospective, Observational Registry of Renaissance-guided Spine Surgeries
NCT ID: NCT02212899
Last Updated: 2020-10-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
93 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-02-18
2016-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Robotic-Guided Registry of Spine Surgery
NCT05181098
Clinical Evidence of Robot Guided vs. Navigated vs. Free Hand Lumbar Spinal Fusion
NCT02998060
ADDRESS - Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Spinal Deformity
NCT02058238
Bone Graft Materials Observational Registry
NCT00974623
SpineTRACK Registry - Spinal Outcomes Registry
NCT01372592
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main endpoints that will be collected are surgical endpoints (e.g. complication rates), patient reported outcomes (e.g. VAS, ODI), imaging parameters (e.g. coronal and sagittal alignment, mainly in reconstructive surgeries for spinal deformities) and technical parameters (e.g. use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, ratio of planned vs. executed screws).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Patient capable of complying with study requirements. Signed informed consent by patient.
Exclusion Criteria
Patient cannot follow study protocol, for any reason. Patient cannot or will not sign informed consent.
6 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mazor Robotics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Doron Dinstein, MD, MBA
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Mazor Robotics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lyerly Baptist/ Lyerly Neurosurgery
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Tabor Orthopedics
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Spine Associates
Houston, Texas, United States
The Virginia Spine Institute
Reston, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lieberman IH, Hardenbrook MA, Wang JC, Guyer RD. Assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy, procedure time, and radiation exposure using a miniature robotic guidance system. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Jul;25(5):241-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318218a5ef.
Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, Pfeiffer M, Horne D, Silberstein B, Hardenbrook M, Kiriyanthan G, Barzilay Y, Bruskin A, Sackerer D, Alexandrovsky V, Stuer C, Burger R, Maeurer J, Donald GD, Schoenmayr R, Friedlander A, Knoller N, Schmieder K, Pechlivanis I, Kim IS, Meyer B, Shoham M. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 15;35(24):2109-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d323ab.
Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, Giese A, Rohde V. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):860-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1729-2. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients. Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22(3):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2499-1. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):E111-20. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254048.79024.8b.
Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 15;32(2):E56-64. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000252094.64857.ab.
Tian NF, Huang QS, Zhou P, Zhou Y, Wu RK, Lou Y, Xu HZ. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):846-59. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1577-5. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Sansur CA, Glassman SD, Ames CP, Berven SH, Polly DW Jr, Perra JH, Knapp DR, Boachie-Adjei O, McCarthy RE, Shaffrey CI; Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 1;36(15):1218-28. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5fd9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLN111
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.