Prospective, Observational Registry of Renaissance-guided Spine Surgeries

NCT ID: NCT02212899

Last Updated: 2020-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

93 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-18

Study Completion Date

2016-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To establish an observational registry for systematic collection of clinical data from Renaissance-guided spine surgeries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The key objective of this observational registry is to prospectively collect data to facilitate the quantification of potential short- and long-term benefits of Renaissance-guided spine surgery. It establishes a common framework for collaboration between surgeons performing Renaissance-guided spine surgeries in either minimally invasive (MIS) or open surgical approaches.

The main endpoints that will be collected are surgical endpoints (e.g. complication rates), patient reported outcomes (e.g. VAS, ODI), imaging parameters (e.g. coronal and sagittal alignment, mainly in reconstructive surgeries for spinal deformities) and technical parameters (e.g. use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, ratio of planned vs. executed screws).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Degenerative Spine Disease Spinal Deformity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients undergoing spinal surgery in a posterior approach where the surgeon used Renaissance surgical guidance system.

Patient capable of complying with study requirements. Signed informed consent by patient.

Exclusion Criteria

Any significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participant at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study.

Patient cannot follow study protocol, for any reason. Patient cannot or will not sign informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mazor Robotics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Doron Dinstein, MD, MBA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mazor Robotics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lyerly Baptist/ Lyerly Neurosurgery

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tabor Orthopedics

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Spine Associates

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Virginia Spine Institute

Reston, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lieberman IH, Hardenbrook MA, Wang JC, Guyer RD. Assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy, procedure time, and radiation exposure using a miniature robotic guidance system. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Jul;25(5):241-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318218a5ef.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21602728 (View on PubMed)

Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, Pfeiffer M, Horne D, Silberstein B, Hardenbrook M, Kiriyanthan G, Barzilay Y, Bruskin A, Sackerer D, Alexandrovsky V, Stuer C, Burger R, Maeurer J, Donald GD, Schoenmayr R, Friedlander A, Knoller N, Schmieder K, Pechlivanis I, Kim IS, Meyer B, Shoham M. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 15;35(24):2109-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d323ab.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21079498 (View on PubMed)

Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, Giese A, Rohde V. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):860-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1729-2. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21384205 (View on PubMed)

Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients. Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22(3):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2499-1. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22975723 (View on PubMed)

Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):E111-20. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254048.79024.8b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17268254 (View on PubMed)

Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 15;32(2):E56-64. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000252094.64857.ab.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17224800 (View on PubMed)

Tian NF, Huang QS, Zhou P, Zhou Y, Wu RK, Lou Y, Xu HZ. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):846-59. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1577-5. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20862593 (View on PubMed)

Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Sansur CA, Glassman SD, Ames CP, Berven SH, Polly DW Jr, Perra JH, Knapp DR, Boachie-Adjei O, McCarthy RE, Shaffrey CI; Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 1;36(15):1218-28. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5fd9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21217448 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLN111

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spine Oncology Registry
NCT07225491 RECRUITING
LUMBAR & SACROILIAC FUSION STUDY
NCT07204288 RECRUITING NA
Function and Scoliosis Surgery
NCT02237248 COMPLETED