Clinical Study With a Robotic Assistant in Patients Requiring a Spinal Transpedicular Fixation

NCT ID: NCT06153511

Last Updated: 2023-12-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-16

Study Completion Date

2023-07-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This multicenter, non-comparative clinical trial, led by two principal investigators in Spain, aims to evaluate the safety and performance of a robotic assistant, based on a electromechanical tracking system, in patients requiring transpedicular screw fixation. The study, conducted in two different hospital centers, involves patients with vertebral fractures, spinal stenosis, kyphosis, and other related conditions. The primary objective is to determine screw accuracy by assessing the degree of screw invasion into the pedicle using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, with a target of achieving 96% acceptable screw placement. Trained radiologists will evaluate the screw invasion into the pedicle. The study is scheduled to span 12 months and each intervention includes a 1-month follow-up. Throughout this time frame, patients will undergo regular assessments, and outcomes will be closely monitored.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Multicenter non-comparative clinical trial.

This interventional study aims to assess the safety and performance of a robotic assistant, based on a electromechanical tracking system, in patients requiring transpedicular screw fixation.The primary focus is on overcoming the limitations of traditional minimally invasive surgeries and enhancing the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, especially within the complex pedicle region adjacent to the spinal canal.

The study design is a prospective interventional trial conducted in two hospital centers in Spain, with two principal investigators leading the investigation. Patients requiring transpedicular screw fixation will be recruited. The robotic assistant will be employed to facilitate transpedicular screw fixation. The system aims to improve accuracy and safety in screw placement, in comparison with conventional techniques used.

Patients will include individuals with spinal fractures, spinal stenosis, kyphosis, and other conditions requiring transpedicular screw fixation. Two principal investigators in Spain will lead the recruitment process.

The study aims to answer several key questions:

* Determine Screw Accuracy: Assess the degree of screw invasion into the pedicle using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, with a target of achieving 96% acceptable screw placement.
* Evaluate Planning vs. Final Screw Placement: Determine the accuracy of screw placement by comparing planned positions with the actual final positions.
* System Performance: Assess the overall performance of the robotic system during the surgical procedure.
* Reoperation and Postoperative Time: Determine the need for reoperation and evaluate postoperative recovery time.
* Adverse Events: Detect and document any adverse events occurring during the surgical process.

Trained radiologists will play a crucial role in evaluating the accuracy of screw placement, focusing on the degree of invasion into the pedicle using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. The study is set to span a duration of 12 months,during which patients will undergo regular assessments, and outcomes will be closely monitored. The inclusion of the electromechanical tracking system in the robotic assistant adds a technological dimension to the investigation, contributing to advancements in the field of minimally invasive spinal surgeries.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

SPINAL Fracture Vertebral Fractures Spinal Stenosis Kyphosis Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Thoracolumbar Kyphosis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Robot assisted spinal fusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient with spinal condition who requires a transpedicular fixation intervention.

Patient with spinal condition (vertebral fractures, spinal stenosis, kyphosis, among others) who requires a intervention for spinal fusion with pedicle screws.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robot assisted spinal transpedicular fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical technique which joins two or more vetebrae with screws and rods to prevent any relative movement between them. It is a major surgery that usually lasts several hours and in which the patient is subjected to general anesthesia. The screws to be placed go through a narrow area of the vertebra known as the pedicle. Each patient will undergo a singular intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robot assisted spinal transpedicular fixation

Surgical technique which joins two or more vetebrae with screws and rods to prevent any relative movement between them. It is a major surgery that usually lasts several hours and in which the patient is subjected to general anesthesia. The screws to be placed go through a narrow area of the vertebra known as the pedicle. Each patient will undergo a singular intervention.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Robotic assisted pedicle screw insertion

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient scheduled for spinal fusion Surgery requiring pedicle screw insertion.
* Open or minimally invasive (MIS) technique.
* Spinal regions: lumbar, thoracic and/or sacral (one patient may cover several regions).
* Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Paediatric patient (\< 18 years)
* Pedicular Surgery history with screw insertion in the vertebra to be operated.
* Any contraindication for the pedicular screw placement.
* Severe scoliosis.
* Severe osteoporosis.
* Infection or neoplasia.
* Obesity.
* Pregnancy and lactancy.
* Any other disease or disorder that, in the opinión of the neurosurgeron, may put the patient at risk or may influence the results of the study.
* Simultaneous participation in other clinical studies.
* For whatever reason, the Clinical protocol cannot be followed.
* The patient is unable, or unwilling, to sign the informed consent.
* Patients in emergency situation who are not legally able to participate in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cyber Surgery S.L.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolás M. Samprón Lebed, Neurosurgeon

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Donostia

Iñigo C. Pomposo Gastelu, Neurosurgeon

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital de Cruces

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cyber Surgery

Donostia / San Sebastian, Gipuzkoa, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PROTCL-CYB-01-PIC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id