Observation Versus Surgical Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer Who Achieved Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

NCT ID: NCT02052921

Last Updated: 2020-05-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2020-04-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

With the possibility of pathological complete response in surgical specimens, some authors have proposed non-operative management of the patient group, when re-staged after neoadjuvant treatment, have complete clinical response. So far, this approach remains discussed in the literature, and there are still many uncertainties that patients with clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy in fact no detectable viable tumor and may be omitted of radical surgical treatment. It is a still investigational approach and actually gained space even for patients with very high or who refuse surgery after all clarifications surgical risk.

Hypothesis: The preservation of the rectum in patients with adenocarcinoma of the middle and distal rectum (up to 10 cm) reaching clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have similar rate of the rectal cancer recurrence than patients who underwent surgical rectal resection.

This will be a prospective, randomized, open label phase II of surgical resection versus conservative treatment (observation) in patients with mid and distal rectal cancer who achieved complete after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with clinical response.

The main objective of this study is to assess whether conservative approach is similar to rectosigmoidectomy with complete mesorectal excision or amputation abdminoperineal the rectum in patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy combined chemoradiotherapy.

Patient Selection: To be eligible patients who have neoadjuvant prior histologic diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma, tumors located within 10 cm from the anal verge, a complete clinical response after treatment with chemoradiotherapy for rectal tumors staged clinical and radiological T3-4 N0 M0 or T (any) N + M0, absence of colorectal synchronous tumors.

Treatment: Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to resection of the rectum or notice. The period for randomization of patients will be 12 weeks after the last dose of radiotherapy / chemotherapy, so that we can properly assess the antitumor response as described above. After randomization, patients in the surgical group will undergo resection of the rectum with complete excision of mesorectal within 2 weeks after randomization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rectal resection

Surgical rectal resection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rectal resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical rectal resection

Observation

Conservative approach

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Observation

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rectal resection

Surgical rectal resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Observation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histological diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma
* tumors located within 10 cm from the anal verge by rigid proctoscopy measurement
* Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant treatment with chemoradiotherapy for rectal tumors clinical and radiologically staged as T3-4 N0 M0 or T (any) N + M0
* Absence of colorectal synchronous tumors
* Age between 18 and 75 years
* ECOG performance scale ≤ 2,
* last dose of chemotherapy / radiation therapy in up to 12 weeks
* Good organic function
* Absence of serious comorbidities defined by the doctor to prevent surgical resection of the rectum and / or neoadjuvant therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Comorbidities clinically significant where surgical resection and / or neoadjuvant therapy is impossible, according to medical assessment.
* Prior antineoplastic therapy different from neoadjuvant therapy.
* History of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.
* Confirmation or strongly suspected inherited polyp syndrome.
* Pregnant women or during lactation (women of childbearing age should have a negative pregnancy test).
* Concurrent participation in another research protocol involving therapeutic intervention.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ivan Cecconello, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculdade de Medicina da USP

Ulysses Ribeiro, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto Do Câncer Do Estado de São Paulo

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NP172/11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.