A Study Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Observation for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy Treatment.
NCT ID: NCT01941979
Last Updated: 2014-10-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
309 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-30
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is possible that adjuvant chemotherapy has a positive impact on survival of patients already treated with neoadjuvant combination therapy. However it is necessary to identify those patients that might have this benefit.
An exploratory analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22921 study showed that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy has benefited only the group of patients who had a reduction of tumor stage to ypT0-2. In the group who had no reduction (ypT3-4), there was no benefit. Retrospective analyzes suggest that the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a predictor of prognosis and even benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy. However the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer remains controversial. Therefore, a randomized trial is needed to answer this question.
Based on these data the investigators proposed a phase III study, randomized, unblinded, adjuvant chemotherapy based on Fluorouracil(5-FU) and Oxaliplatin versus observation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma T3-4, N0-1, M0 previously treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and who did not presented complete response. The investigator believes that this subgroup of patients, who have not achieved complete response, will be benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Study objective:
The main objective of this study is verify if adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin, for 4 months, increases recurrence-free survival versus the observation. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of toxicity, overall survival and assessment of biomarkers (study protocol separately).
The study's primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS) to be defined as time from randomization to radiological detection of distant disease and / or locoregional recurrence. Isolate carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) increase will not be consider as recurrence until a new measurable lesion be found.
NOTE: The TNM system is based on the size and/or extent (reach) of the primary tumor (T), the amount of spread to nearby lymph nodes (N), and the presence of metastasis (M) or secondary tumors formed by the spread of cancer cells to other parts of the body.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT05274945
Capecitabine Versus Bolus 5-Fu Associated to Radiotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer.
NCT03428529
Randomized Controlled Study on Optimize Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT02031939
Non-Operative Radiation Management of Adenocarcinoma of the Lower Rectum
NCT02641691
A Prospective Phase II Study of Individualized Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Based on Recurrence Risk
NCT04664504
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adjuvant therapy
5-FU, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatine (FLOX) OR Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)
NOTE: If the patient was randomized for the arm experimental, the investigator can choose between intravenous (IV) treatment or oral treatment (PO). Both are considered equal by the principal investigator.
5-FU, Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin.
Observation
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
5-FU, Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Tumor with clinical end radiological incomplete response after neoadjuvant therapy, according to institutional routine, and completely resection by mesorectal excision with clear margins technique.
* No more than 8 weeks after the surgery.
* Normal result of CEA in compared to the pre randomization results (28 days of window)
* Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1.
* Adequate organ function during screening (28 days of window)
, defined as:
1. Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and amino alanine transferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 × Upper Limit of Normal(ULN)
2. Serum total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 × ULN
3. Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500 /mm3
4. Platelet count ≥ 100000 /mm3
5. Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL
6. Serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 × ULN
* Signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with surgical complications that prevent them from receiving adjuvant therapy for up to 8 weeks after surgery;
* Compromised surgical margins.
* Confirmation or strong suspicion of Lynch syndrome.
* History of serious illness or psychiatric clinic.
* Patients who participate in other protocols with experimental drugs.
* For female patients, current pregnancy and/or lactation.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ICESP
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NP-113/2011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.