The Hospital Volume Relationship in Appendicectomy Outcomes
NCT ID: NCT02018016
Last Updated: 2024-05-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
40000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2001-01-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Appendicitis is a common condition which represents a significant resource burden for the Scottish National Health Service (NHS). It is unknown whether there are significant differences in Scottish appendicectomy (appendectomy) outcomes which may be explained by hospital volume. In many studies, hospital procedural volume has been shown to be predictive of surgical outcomes.
Aims
The aim of this study is to compare appendicectomy outcomes in Scotland as they vary by hospital procedural volume.
Methods
This research study is a retrospective observational enquiry which will utilise administrative data from the Information Services Division (ISD) of NHS National Services Scotland. Patient episodes will be identified by a procedure codes for appendicectomy. A 10 year period will be studied, from January 2001 to December 2010.
Primary outcome measures will be risk-adjusted 30 day/inpatient mortality, 30 day readmission rate, 30 day re-operation rate, length of stay and negative appendicectomy rate.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
NCT04618666
Appendectomy in Children Performed by Residents in the Era of Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01657565
Postoperative Complications After Appendectomy
NCT03119740
Identifiable Factors That May Lead to Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Simple Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT02044640
APPEndicitis and Laparoscopic Criteria; APPEL Study
NCT01054417
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a retrospective study of all appendicectomies performed in Scotland during the period from 1st January 2001 - 31st December 2010. It will use routinely collected administrative data from the Information Services Division (ISD) of NHS National Services Scotland.
The registry which will supply the data for this study is the Scottish Morbidity Record 01 (SMR01), the full title of which is the "General / Acute Inpatient and Day Case dataset" (see http://www.adls.ac.uk/nhs-scotland/general-acute-inpatient-day-case-smr01/?detail). SMR01 is collated and administered by ISD, and data submission is mandatory for all Scottish NHS providers of in-patient or day-case care. Approximately 1.4 million records are added each year. Diagnoses are coded according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 standards and procedures are coded according to the United Kingdom's Office of Population Census Statistics (OPCS) standards, the most recent of which is version 4.5. The data quality in SMR01 is high and is assured by regular internal audits. In the 2010 audit of accuracy, Main Condition was recorded with an accuracy of 88% and Main Procedure was recorded with an accuracy of 94%.
Where data inconsistencies are identified in the extract supplied for this study, further clarification will be obtained where possible with ISD's data retrieval support team. Data completeness is very high in SMR01. However, where significant volumes of data are missing or unusable, the need for data imputation will be explored.
The study period was decided on pragmatically by a desire to provide an assessment of current practice, fully within the era of widely practised laparoscopic surgery. A power calculation also suggested that this would provide an adequate sample size to demonstrate differences.
Our power calculation- specific to length of stay- was based on Faiz O, Clark J, Brown T, Bottle A, Antoniou A, Farrands P, et al. Traditional and Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Adults. Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):800-6. In their cohort of 259,735 appendicectomies performed from 1996-2006, the geometric mean length of stay was 3.52, with SD 1.8. We decided that a difference of 0.5 days would be 'clinically significant'. We specified alpha 0.05 and Power 0.9, and an allocation ratio of 2 (allowing comparison of one tertile to two others). A two-sided t-test of difference between two independent means was performed in G\*Power 3.1.7. This demonstrated that a total N of 616 was required to demonstrate this difference. According to ISD figures, there were 3,712 appendicectomy procedures performed in 2010/11, so we will be able to detect a clinically significant difference in length of stay.
Hospitals will be placed into tertiles of high, medium and low volume, according to the number of procedures performed over the study period.
In the absence of a literature standard appendicectomy outcome measure, the following will be assessed as primary outcome measures: 30 day/in-patient mortality, 30 day re-admission rate, 30 day re-operation rate, post-operative length of stay and negative appendicectomy rates between these 3 groups. Potentially significant confounding variables such as age, gender, and co-morbidity will be studied for their predictive value in a univariate model and included in a multivariate model if they remain significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High volume hospitals
The hospitals in the upper tertile for procedural volume
No interventions assigned to this group
Medium volume hospitals
The hospitals in the middle tertile for procedural volume
No interventions assigned to this group
Low volume hospitals
The hospitals in the lowest tertile for procedural volume.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients non-resident in Scotland
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Edinburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ewen M Harrison, FRCS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Edinburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
All Scottish NHS Hospitals
Multiple Locations, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
XRB13069-VA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.