Study of Prognostic Factors in Aortic Dissection Type B

NCT ID: NCT01984905

Last Updated: 2025-03-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-25

Study Completion Date

2018-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical outcomes of chronic type B aortic dissections are unknown, especially in case of false lumen expansion and risk of rupture. Data of literature give us some indications about prognosis. The 1-year survival rate is about 80%, but we deplore the 25% rate of mortality at 3 years despite follow-up.The only known predictive factors are the initial diameter of more than 4 cm and the persistence of a false lumen patent.However, actual means of follow-up do not allow to predict severe complications. The aim of the sudy is to propose a diagnostic and preventive strategy for the follow-up of chronic type B aortic dissections treated medically.

The primary objective is then to evaluate the prognostic role of 18-FDG-PET Scan in such patients in order to predict the risk of aortic diameter growth of more than 5 mm in 1 year and/or of an aortic dissections extension at 1 year. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the link between fibrosis biomarkers MMP et TIMP) and the results of imaging results (evolution of diameter and extension and results of PET-Scan imaging) Methods: 100 patients to be included in 3 years History of chronic type B aortic dissection, treated medically, evolving since more than 1 month and less than 5 years.

Expected results: Prognostic contribution of 18FDG-PET-Scan and biomarkers for the identification of patients at high risk of evolution. Elaboration of a decisional algorithm about follow-up modalities of chronic aortic dissections. Demonstration of a correlation between aortic diameter growth or aortic dissection extension and intensity of marker fixation with 18-FDG-PET-Scan.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type B Aortic Dissection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 18 years old
* Chronic type B aortic dissection, without surgical treatment
* Medically treated patient
* Medical treatment since more than 1 month and less than 5 years
* Aortic dissection localization : below left subclavian artery and alow femoral artery
* Affiliation to a social security system
* Patient who have given informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* History of malignant pathology
* Aortic dissection since less than 1 month or more than 5 years
* Inflammatory or infectious disease of the aorta
* Uncontrolled infectious disease
* Iodine Allergy
* Severe renal insufficiency (cockcroft clearance \<30 mL/min)
* Patient under guardianship or curators
* Any associated medical or psychological condition wich could compromise the patient's ability to participate in the study
* Inability to be submitted to the study follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons
* Current pregnancy or lack of effective contraception during their reproductive years
* Suckle
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Caen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ludovic BERGER, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Caen UH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Caen University Hospital

Caen, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-A00209-36

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.