Evaluate the Effectiveness and Cost of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Non-invasive Evaluation of Lesions Discovered on Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA)
NCT ID: NCT00538460
Last Updated: 2010-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
1 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-09-30
2009-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography and Vasodilator Stress Magnetic Resonance Imaging Perfusion in Patients With Prior Equivocal Stress Test for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
NCT00929227
Prognostic Role of LA Strain in Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT06408636
Efficacy of Non Contrast DWI(Diffusion Weighted Imaging) Imaging Compared to DMR-DE
NCT01820000
Refinement and Assessment of New MRI Technologies for Thoracic/ Cardiovascular Exams
NCT00727792
CMR in the Assessment of Patient With ACS in the Emergency Room
NCT00564382
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The endpoints of the study are:
Primary outcome variables:
1\. Length of ED stay until definitive diagnosis (time from ED triage until definitive diagnosis).
Secondary outcome variables will include:
1. Cost of care of an early diagnostic strategy utilizing stress CMR vs. standard care (costs incurred during index hospitalization and 30 day follow up period) in patients with intermediate lesions of CTA.
2. Accuracy of CTA + stress CMR in prediction of occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during a 3 month follow-up period, compared to the standard care (CTA + stress/rest MPI): cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, need for coronary artery revascularization, need for admission or treatment for documented CAD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Low risk TIMI risk score (ie. ≤3)
3. Able to provide informed consent
4. Age equal to or greater than 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Positive cardiac biomarkers (troponin, myoglobin, and/or creatinine phosphokinase MB fraction).
3. Presence of pre-existing CAD (prior myocardial infarction, prior angiographic evidence of significant CAD, prior coronary bypass surgery) or cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction \< 45%)
4. Renal insufficiency (creatinine ≥1.6) or renal failure requiring dialysis.
5. Atrial fibrillation or other markedly irregular rhythm.
6. Inability or refusal to provide informed consent.
7. Psychological unsuitability or extreme claustrophobia.
8. Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status.
9. Age less than 18 years.
10. Clinical instability as deemed by the attending physician; including cardiogenic shock, hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg), refractory hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 180 mmHg), sustained ventricular or atrial arrhythmia requiring intravenous medications.
11. Patients with known allergy to iodine or shellfish.
12. Inability to tolerate beta blockers, including those with COPD or asthma requiring maintenance inhaled bronchodilators or steroids, complete heart block, second-degree atrioventricular block.
13. Computed tomography imaging, or contrast administration, within the past 48 hours.
14. Use of Viagra or Cialis in the past 24 hours.
15. Patients with known allergy to gadolinium, x-ray dye, Persantine
16. Extreme claustrophobia.
17. Patients with metal implants that prevent MRI scanning
18. Patients with a body weight \> 400 lbs
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
William Beaumont Hospitals
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
William Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak, MI
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kavitha Chinnaiyan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
William Beaumont Hospitals
Gilbert Raff, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
William Beaumont Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007-085
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.