The Chocolate Study

NCT ID: NCT01949636

Last Updated: 2018-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

131 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-05-31

Study Completion Date

2018-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to test the dynamic vulnerability model of obesity using brain imaging.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Obese vs lean humans show greater gustatory/oral somatosensory and reward region responsivity to palatable food images/cues and this predicts future weight gain (Yokum et al., 2011; Stice et al., 2008, 2010b; Stoeckel et al., 2008), in line with reward surfeit and incentive sensitization models of obesity (Berridge, 2009; Davis et al., 2004). Yet, obese vs lean humans have fewer dopamine (DA) receptors in striatal reward regions, show reduced striatal response to palatable food intake, and low striatal response predicts future weight gain in those at genetic risk for reduced DA signaling (Felsted et al., 2010; Stice et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2001; Volkow et al., 2008), in line with the reward deficit model of obesity (Wang et al., 2002b). One explanation for the mixed findings is that some of these findings reflect initial risk factors and others result from overeating. Firing of DA neurons in reward regions shifts from food intake to cues that predict food intake after conditioning (Kiyatkin et al., 1994; Schultz et al., 1993) and overeating leads to reduced D2 receptor density, D2 sensitivity, and reward sensitivity in rats (Alsio et al., 2010; Kelley et al., 2003; Johnson \& Kenny, 2010) and striatal response to food in humans (Stice et al., 2010a), implying that overeating leads to increased incentive sensitization and down-regulation of reward regions. Further, reduced inhibitory region response to food images/cues predicts future overeating and weight gain (Cornier et al., 2010). Data imply that youth at risk for obesity initially show greater responsivity of regions that encode the reward value of food cues, coupled with greater responsivity of gustatory/oral somatosensory regions that encode the sugar and fat content of foods, and with reduced inhibitory region responsivity, which lead to overeating/weight gain that produces blunted striatal DA signaling, increased responsivity of reward valuation regions to food cues, and reduced inhibitory activation in response to food stimuli, increasing risk for further overeating/weight gain. We propose to conduct a rigorous test of this dynamic-vulnerability model using a novel repeated measures fMRI design in which teens complete scans annually over 4 years. Aim 1: test whether elevated gustatory/oral somatosensory and reward region responsivity and reduced inhibitory region responsivity to palatable food images, cues, and intake of food varying in sugar/fat content, and behavioral inhibitory control deficits/immediate reward bias predict initial increases in % body fat in 130 lean teens. Aim 2: use growth curve models to test whether initial increases in % body fat and energy dense food intake predict future decreases in striatal response to palatable food receipt, increases in reward circuitry response to palatable food images/cues, decreased inhibitory region response to food images/cues, and increased behavioral inhibitory control deficits/immediate reward bias. Aim 3: test whether decreased striatal response to palatable food, increased reward region response to food images/cues, reduced inhibitory region response to food images/cues, behavioral inhibitory control deficits/immediate reward bias predict further escalation in % body fat.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

lean adolescents

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* between 14-16 years old
* BMI between 25th and 75th percentile

Exclusion Criteria

* contraindicators of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

1. metal implants
2. braces
3. pregnancy
* symptoms of major psychiatric disorders (substance use disorders, conduct disorder, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, major depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder)
* binge eating
* use of pyschoactive drugs
* serious medical conditions (diabetes, brain injury)
* smoking
* dietary allergy to dairy
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oregon Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eric Stice, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oregon Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oregon Research Institute

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Alsio J, Olszewski PK, Norback AH, Gunnarsson ZE, Levine AS, Pickering C, Schioth HB. Dopamine D1 receptor gene expression decreases in the nucleus accumbens upon long-term exposure to palatable food and differs depending on diet-induced obesity phenotype in rats. Neuroscience. 2010 Dec 15;171(3):779-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.09.046. Epub 2010 Sep 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20875839 (View on PubMed)

Berridge KC. 'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders. Physiol Behav. 2009 Jul 14;97(5):537-50. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.044. Epub 2009 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19336238 (View on PubMed)

Cornier MA, Salzberg AK, Endly DC, Bessesen DH, Tregellas JR. Sex-based differences in the behavioral and neuronal responses to food. Physiol Behav. 2010 Mar 30;99(4):538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20096712 (View on PubMed)

Davis C, Strachan S, Berkson M. Sensitivity to reward: implications for overeating and overweight. Appetite. 2004 Apr;42(2):131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2003.07.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15010176 (View on PubMed)

Felsted JA, Ren X, Chouinard-Decorte F, Small DM. Genetically determined differences in brain response to a primary food reward. J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 17;30(7):2428-32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5483-09.2010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20164326 (View on PubMed)

Johnson PM, Kenny PJ. Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats. Nat Neurosci. 2010 May;13(5):635-41. doi: 10.1038/nn.2519. Epub 2010 Mar 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20348917 (View on PubMed)

Kelley AE, Will MJ, Steininger TL, Zhang M, Haber SN. Restricted daily consumption of a highly palatable food (chocolate Ensure(R)) alters striatal enkephalin gene expression. Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Nov;18(9):2592-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02991.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14622160 (View on PubMed)

Kiyatkin EA, Gratton A. Electrochemical monitoring of extracellular dopamine in nucleus accumbens of rats lever-pressing for food. Brain Res. 1994 Aug 1;652(2):225-34. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90231-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7953734 (View on PubMed)

Schultz W, Apicella P, Ljungberg T. Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task. J Neurosci. 1993 Mar;13(3):900-13. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-03-00900.1993.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8441015 (View on PubMed)

Stice E, Davis K, Miller NP, Marti CN. Fasting increases risk for onset of binge eating and bulimic pathology: a 5-year prospective study. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Nov;117(4):941-6. doi: 10.1037/a0013644.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19025239 (View on PubMed)

Stice E, Yokum S, Blum K, Bohon C. Weight gain is associated with reduced striatal response to palatable food. J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 29;30(39):13105-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2105-10.2010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20881128 (View on PubMed)

Stice E, Yokum S, Bohon C, Marti N, Smolen A. Reward circuitry responsivity to food predicts future increases in body mass: moderating effects of DRD2 and DRD4. Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1618-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.081. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20116437 (View on PubMed)

Stoeckel LE, Weller RE, Cook EW 3rd, Twieg DB, Knowlton RC, Cox JE. Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods. Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):636-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.031. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18413289 (View on PubMed)

Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Thanos PK, Logan J, Alexoff D, Ding YS, Wong C, Ma Y, Pradhan K. Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors. Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 1;42(4):1537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jun 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18598772 (View on PubMed)

Wang GJ, Volkow ND, Felder C, Fowler JS, Levy AV, Pappas NR, Wong CT, Zhu W, Netusil N. Enhanced resting activity of the oral somatosensory cortex in obese subjects. Neuroreport. 2002 Jul 2;13(9):1151-5. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200207020-00016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12151759 (View on PubMed)

Wang GJ, Volkow ND, Logan J, Pappas NR, Wong CT, Zhu W, Netusil N, Fowler JS. Brain dopamine and obesity. Lancet. 2001 Feb 3;357(9253):354-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03643-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11210998 (View on PubMed)

Yokum S, Ng J, Stice E. Attentional bias to food images associated with elevated weight and future weight gain: an fMRI study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Sep;19(9):1775-83. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.168. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21681221 (View on PubMed)

Yokum S, Bohon C, Berkman E, Stice E. Test-retest reliability of functional MRI food receipt, anticipated receipt, and picture tasks. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Aug 2;114(2):764-779. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab096.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33851199 (View on PubMed)

Yokum S, Stice E. Weight gain is associated with changes in neural response to palatable food tastes varying in sugar and fat and palatable food images: a repeated-measures fMRI study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Dec 1;110(6):1275-1286. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz204.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31535135 (View on PubMed)

Shearrer GE, Stice E, Burger KS. Adolescents at high risk of obesity show greater striatal response to increased sugar content in milkshakes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jun 1;107(6):859-866. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy050.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29771283 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://chocolate.ori.org/

Recruitment website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01DK092468

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

092468

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Food Intake Decisions
NCT03095833 TERMINATED NA
Emotions, Dopamine, Brain and Body
NCT06171087 RECRUITING PHASE4
Real Time fMRI and Quitting Smoking
NCT03302026 COMPLETED NA
Neuroimaging for Depression
NCT00864630 TERMINATED NA