Evaluation of Green Dot a Primary Prevention Intervention
NCT ID: NCT01878097
Last Updated: 2019-03-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
89707 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-11-30
2014-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Pilot of Bystander Training Programming in Sexual Violence and Subtance Abuse
NCT02591212
Primary Prevention of Sexual Violence Among College Students
NCT03037866
Multi-College Bystander Efficacy Evaluation
NCT02659423
Evaluating a Video Bystander Program for First-Year College Students
NCT03056560
Preventing Sexual Violence Through a Comprehensive, Peer-led Initiative
NCT03207386
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Green Dot Bystander Training
Green Dot intervention
Green Dot Bystander Intevention
Intervention allocated at the school level
Control
Awareness Eduation
Control
Awareness Education
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Green Dot Bystander Intevention
Intervention allocated at the school level
Control
Awareness Education
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
14 Years
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Kentucky
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ann Coker
Professor and Endowed Chair
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ann L. Coker, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kentucky
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Coker AL, Bush HM, Cook-Craig PG, DeGue SA, Clear ER, Brancato CJ, Fisher BS, Recktenwald EA. RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence. Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):566-578. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
Coker AL, Bush HM, Brancato CJ, Clear ER, Recktenwald EA. Bystander Program Effectiveness to Reduce Violence Acceptance: RCT in High Schools. J Fam Violence. 2019;34(3):153-164. doi: 10.1007/s10896-018-9961-8. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
Mennicke AM, Bush HM, Brancato CJ, Coker AL. Bystander Program to Reduce Sexual Violence by Witnessing Parental Intimate Partner Violence Status. Am J Prev Med. 2022 Aug;63(2):262-272. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.12.022. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.