MedDataX Logo

Preventing Sexual Violence Through a Comprehensive, Peer-led Initiative

NCT ID: NCT03207386

Last Updated: 2021-11-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2647 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-27

Study Completion Date

2020-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this multiple baseline study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive youth-led sexual violence (SV) prevention program, Youth Voices in Prevention (Youth VIP). The prevention program builds on youth-adult partnerships among middle and high school students in Rapid City, South Dakota. Consenting students will take part in a youth summit where they will be trained as popular opinion leaders to spread SV prevention messages among middle and high school youth and parents. Following the summit, youth will work in small groups focused on different aspects of evidence-based prevention strategies including bystander intervention, social marketing messaging, parent education, norms change, and social emotional learning. Multiple research methods will be used to examine implementation process and cost. In addition, consenting students will take six surveys across three years including several surveys before programming begins, and several to document Youth VIP outcomes after prevention programming takes place. Survey data from a demographically similar community will be used to assess changes over time among youth in Rapid City, SD. All phases of the project will be implemented with collaboration from a Research Programming Advisory Board of community members and professionals from Rapid City, SD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sexual violence (SV) impacts adolescents at rates higher than most other age demographics. Although it is a critical public health issue for youth, there are few prevention initiatives that lead to reductions in SV. There is increasing recognition that SV prevention efforts may be most effective if youth are central to the development and implementation of such efforts. Problematically, there are no rigorously evaluated youth-led SV prevention efforts, and researchers also know little about the process by which youth create prevention initiatives. Teen UP (TU) is a youth-led initiative in Rapid City, SD that focuses on addressing a variety of public health issues, including awareness about SV. This "homegrown" initiative is well integrated in the community and is the ideal platform on which additional multi-level, evidence-based SV prevention strategies can be added. Researchers and SV prevention specialists at the University of New Hampshire, in partnership with Rape Prevention Education-funded agencies in South Dakota (SD) (i.e., Network Against Family Violence and Sexual Assault \[The Network\] and Working Against Violence Inc. \[WAVI\]), will work together along with a number of community stakeholders (e.g., educators, peers, elders) and expert consultants to enhance TU to include additional SV prevention strategies, a project titled Youth Voices in Prevention (Youth VIP). Although the plan for the programming enhancement will be refined based on feedback from the Research and Programming Advisory Board (RPAB) and data collected during the refinement and planning phase of the project, the current plan is to convene a youth summit where high school youth will be trained as popular opinion leaders to diffuse SV prevention messages in addition to youth joining a formal working group specific to a SV prevention strategy that also aligns with youth's career aspirations. A mixed method approach will be used to measure implementation processes, fidelity, and costs over time, and to assess the impact of Youth VIP on rates of sexual violence perpetration among middle and high school students, as well as the secondary outcomes of sexual violence victimization, dating violence and bullying victimization and perpetration, depression, and suicidality. Collaboration with the community of students, parents, and professionals in Rapid City will be promoted by establishing a Research Programming Advisory Board (RPAB) that will meet monthly during the project.

All students in grades 7 through 10 in the fall of 2017 will be invited to participate in two baseline and four follow-up surveys that will be given in school. Surveys will take place in fall and spring of each of three school years, and the cohort enrolled in fall of 2017 will be followed over time. Recruitment of students and parents is being done in close collaboration with the Rapid City Area School District. The investigators anticipate enrolling 2,000 students.

Qualitative data includes Photovoice interviews (a technique where students take pictures of their community and describe how those pictures relate to violence in their community), interviews of students who attended programming, and interviews with key adult stakeholders. We will identify common themes in this data using content analysis, then code the interviews for these themes. We will present both the frequency that these themes emerged and key exemplary quotes. We will use a variety of methods to analyze the quantitative data. First, we will examine change in outcomes over time as a function of exposure to programming. Second, using social network analysis, we will examine change in outcomes as a function of the programming exposure of one's close friends. Third, we will use pooled cross-sectional analyses to compare students in the same grade levels over time as the program is implemented (e.g., compare this year's eight graders to last years' eighth graders). Fourth, we will use multilevel modeling to examine trajectories and changes in the cohorts (e.g., compare growth in this year's eight graders to last years' eighth graders) who are nested within schools. We will examine outcomes in these ways for primary outcome (sexual violence perpetration and victimization), intermediary outcomes (e.g., social norms), and secondary outcomes (e.g., suicidal thoughts).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sexual Violence

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Sexual Violence Prevention Mixed-Methods Outcome Evaluation Process Evaluation Adolescence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Multiple baseline survey design across three years including two baseline surveys prior to prevention programming and rollout of doses of programming across two years.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Youth VIP

Youth VIP is a youth-led set of prevention strategies. Youth and their adult mentors are trained in evidence based sexual assault primary prevention strategies at a three day youth summit. The summit is followed by participation in working groups in which youth and their adult mentors will adapt best practices for sexual assault prevention to the Rapid City community and diffuse these strategies through both their own social networks and more formally in work in Rapid City middle and high schools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Youth VIP

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Youth VIP involves youth in partnerships with adults to adapt evidence based sexual violence prevention strategies for the local community environment. Youth VIP includes a three day intensive youth summit for prevention training and ongoing youth-adult prevention working groups.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Youth VIP

Youth VIP involves youth in partnerships with adults to adapt evidence based sexual violence prevention strategies for the local community environment. Youth VIP includes a three day intensive youth summit for prevention training and ongoing youth-adult prevention working groups.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be able to complete online survey independently
* Must be a student in the Rapid City community.

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of New Hampshire

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Katie Edwards

Assistant Professor of Psychology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of New Hampshire

Durham, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin SL, Flint KH, Kawkins J, Harris WA, Lowry R, Olsen EO, McManus T, Chyen D, Whittle L, Taylor E, Demissie Z, Brener N, Thornton J, Moore J, Zaza S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Youth risk behavior surveillance--United States, 2013. MMWR Suppl. 2014 Jun 13;63(4):1-168.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24918634 (View on PubMed)

Cook-Craig PG, Coker AL, Clear ER, Garcia LS, Bush HM, Brancato CJ, Williams CM, Fisher BS. Challenge and opportunity in evaluating a diffusion-based active bystanding prevention program: Green Dot in high schools. Violence Against Women. 2014 Oct;20(10):1179-202. doi: 10.1177/1077801214551288. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25255794 (View on PubMed)

American Association of University Women. (2001) Hostile Hallways: Bullying, Teasing, and Sexual Harassment in School, American Journal of Health Education, 32:5, 307-309, DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2001.10603488

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Edwards KM, Banyard VL, Waterman EA, Mitchell KJ, Jones LM, Kollar LMM, Hopfauf S, Simon B. Evaluating the Impact of a Youth-Led Sexual Violence Prevention Program: Youth Leadership Retreat Outcomes. Prev Sci. 2022 Nov;23(8):1379-1393. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01343-x. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35303249 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UNH-03-6594&6603-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id