Trial Outcomes & Findings for Preventing Sexual Violence Through a Comprehensive, Peer-led Initiative (NCT NCT03207386)
NCT ID: NCT03207386
Last Updated: 2021-11-12
Results Overview
We used several measures to assess for a wide range of interpersonal violence victimization perpetration experiences during the past six months, all with response options 1 = yes or 0 = no. Outcome counts indicate number of participants who reported yes to any form of sexual violence perpetration. We used mirror items to assess for both victimization and perpetration experiences. Three items assessing sexual assault were drawn from Cook-Craig et al.'s (2014) measure that assessed for sexual coercion, physically-forced sex, and incapacitated sex. Five items from the YRBS were used to assess physically forced sexual contact, sexual dating violence, physical dating violence, bullying on school property, and electronic bullying (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014). We used three items from the American Association of University Women (2001) to assess homophobic teasing, sexual harassment, and sexual rumors. Lastly, two items assessed homophobic bullying and racial bullying.
COMPLETED
NA
2647 participants
6 months
2021-11-12
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Youth VIP
Youth VIP is a youth-led set of prevention strategies. Youth and their adult mentors are trained in evidence based sexual assault primary prevention strategies at a three day youth summit. The summit is followed by participation in working groups in which youth and their adult mentors will adapt best practices for sexual assault prevention to the Rapid City community and diffuse these strategies through both their own social networks and more formally in work in Rapid City middle and high schools.
Youth VIP: Youth VIP involves youth in partnerships with adults to adapt evidence based sexual violence prevention strategies for the local community environment. Youth VIP includes a three day intensive youth summit for prevention training and ongoing youth-adult prevention working groups.
Participants could be in both the large camp condition and/or the small camp condition, thus numbers do not consistently add up to 2647 across the results reports for the study.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
2647
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1487
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1160
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Preventing Sexual Violence Through a Comprehensive, Peer-led Initiative
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Youth VIP
n=2647 Participants
Youth VIP is a youth-led set of prevention strategies. Youth and their adult mentors are trained in evidence based sexual assault primary prevention strategies at a three day youth summit. The summit is followed by participation in working groups in which youth and their adult mentors will adapt best practices for sexual assault prevention to the Rapid City community and diffuse these strategies through both their own social networks and more formally in work in Rapid City middle and high schools.
Youth VIP: Youth VIP involves youth in partnerships with adults to adapt evidence based sexual violence prevention strategies for the local community environment. Youth VIP includes a three day intensive youth summit for prevention training and ongoing youth-adult prevention working groups.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
2647 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex at Birth · Female
|
1355 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex at Birth · Male
|
1269 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex at Birth · Unknown
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
334 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
2239 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
410 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
1823 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
259 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
2647 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Participants could be in both the large camp condition and/or the small camp condition, thus numbers do not consistently add up to 2647 across the results reports for the study.
We used several measures to assess for a wide range of interpersonal violence victimization perpetration experiences during the past six months, all with response options 1 = yes or 0 = no. Outcome counts indicate number of participants who reported yes to any form of sexual violence perpetration. We used mirror items to assess for both victimization and perpetration experiences. Three items assessing sexual assault were drawn from Cook-Craig et al.'s (2014) measure that assessed for sexual coercion, physically-forced sex, and incapacitated sex. Five items from the YRBS were used to assess physically forced sexual contact, sexual dating violence, physical dating violence, bullying on school property, and electronic bullying (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014). We used three items from the American Association of University Women (2001) to assess homophobic teasing, sexual harassment, and sexual rumors. Lastly, two items assessed homophobic bullying and racial bullying.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Attended Large Camp
n=104 Participants
Participants attended a large prevention camp.
|
Did Not Attend Large Camp
n=2434 Participants
Participants did not attend a large prevention camp.
|
Attended Small Camp
n=81 Participants
Participants attended a small prevention camp.
|
Did Not Attend Small Camp
n=2457 Participants
Participants did not attend a small prevention camp.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Any Form of Sexual Violence Perpetration
|
5 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Participants could be in both the large camp condition and/or the small camp condition, thus numbers do not consistently add up to 2647 across the results reports for the study.
We used several measures to assess for a wide range of interpersonal violence victimization perpetration experiences during the past six months, all with response options 1 = yes or 0 = no. Outcome counts indicate number of participants who reported yes to any form of sexual violence victimization. We used mirror items to assess for both victimization and perpetration experiences. Three items assessing sexual assault were drawn from Cook-Craig et al.'s (2014) measure that assessed for sexual coercion, physically-forced sex, and incapacitated sex. Five items from the YRBS were used to assess physically forced sexual contact, sexual dating violence, physical dating violence, bullying on school property, and electronic bullying (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014). We used three items from the American Association of University Women (2001) to assess homophobic teasing, sexual harassment, and sexual rumors. Lastly, two items assessed homophobic bullying and racial bullying.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Attended Large Camp
n=104 Participants
Participants attended a large prevention camp.
|
Did Not Attend Large Camp
n=2434 Participants
Participants did not attend a large prevention camp.
|
Attended Small Camp
n=81 Participants
Participants attended a small prevention camp.
|
Did Not Attend Small Camp
n=2457 Participants
Participants did not attend a small prevention camp.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Any Form of Sexual Violence Victimization
|
13 Participants
|
97 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
104 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Youth VIP
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place