Acute Effects of a Flutter Device in COPD

NCT ID: NCT01832961

Last Updated: 2020-02-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible, and is usually progressive and associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases, most commonly cigarette smoking. The disease affects not only the large central airways but also the small, more peripheral airways deeper into the lung, defined as less than 2 mm in diameter.

Besides medical treatment, physiotherapy plays a major role in treatment and various methods have been suggested to remove airway of secretions. The flutter is a simple and small device shaped like a pipe that creates a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) and high frequency oscillation when the expired air passes through it. These vibrations are thought to mobilise airway secretions facilitating their clearance and improving breathing.

Standard blowing tests, like spirometry, where patients blow forcedly into a machine, have previously been used to investigate the efficacy of flutter devices. However, spirometry assesses the damage of larger airways but not small airways, also known as the "silent zone" which, crucially, are specifically damaged in COPD.

In this study the investigators hypothesise that because the flutter helps clear the airways from the excessive thick mucus produced by COPD patients, these patients may find it easier to breathe and have lower resistance to moving air in and out of their lungs.

The main objective of this study is to compare the effect of a flutter or a sham device on small airways damage using impulse oscillometry (IOS), a non-invasive method that, contrary to other common blowing tests, measures small airway resistance during normal breathing.

In addition, because COPD is characterised by inflammation, the investigators would also like to measure a gas the patients blow out, nitric oxide (NO) the levels of which reflect airway inflammation. This will give to investigators an insight into the relationship between airway inflammation and small airway function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. This limitation is usually progressive and associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases.

Patients suffering from COPD may show pathologic changes not only in the large but also in the small airways, which are defined as less than 2mm in diameter. Airway inflammation may cause increased thick mucus secretions which can narrow the airways increasing the resistance to the airflow.

Physiotherapy to remove secretions is indicated for patients with COPD who have regular sputum or those with thick secretions and various techniques and physiotherapy devices can be applied for the removal of secretions. The flutter is a simple and small device shaped like a pipe that creates a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) and high frequency oscillation as expired air passes through it. These vibrations and PEP are thought to mobilise airway secretions facilitating their clearance and improving airflow.

The effects of the flutter device have been studied in different patient groups, but especially in lung diseases characterised by mucus hypersecretion such as COPD, cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis. In COPD, even though the flutter device increases the volume of expectorated secretions, its beneficial effects on pulmonary function as assessed by spirometry and plethysmography are inconclusive. However, these standard lung function tests (such as spirometry) asses the large airways, but do not provide an accurate estimate of the small airways which have been described by some authors as "the silent zone".

The investigators hypothesise that the use of impulse oscillometry (IOS), a non-invasive technique that provides information on small airway resistance during normal breathing, may reveal the effect of the flutter device which may have not been accurately measured by spirometry in previous studies.

In addition, the investigators would like to measure exhaled nitric oxide (NO) levels which reflect airway inflammation and may therefore be useful to determine the association between small airway disease and inflammation.

In summary, the symptoms of patients with COPD improve following breathing exercises with a flutter device, however, the effect of this device on lung function is unclear. The investigators hypothesise that the combined use IOS and NO, would help understand and quantify the effects of the flutter device on the small airways disease in COPD.

The main objective of this study is to measure the effect of a 30 minutes breathing exercise with a flutter device on airway resistance as assessed by impulse oscillometry in patients with COPD.

The secondary objective is to investigate the association between inflammation, airway resistance and volume of secretions in COPD patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

flutter valve exercises

30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Flutter valve exercises

Intervention Type DEVICE

30 minutes of flutter exercises

Flutter and bronchodilator exercises

Intervention Type DEVICE

Flutter + bronchodilator exercises with an interval of 3 to 5 days

flutter-sham exercises

30 minutes of breathing exercise with flutter-sham device

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Flutter Sham exercises

Intervention Type DEVICE

30 minutes of flutter-sham exercises

Flutter and bronchodilator exercises

Intervention Type DEVICE

Flutter + bronchodilator exercises with an interval of 3 to 5 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flutter valve exercises

30 minutes of flutter exercises

Intervention Type DEVICE

Flutter Sham exercises

30 minutes of flutter-sham exercises

Intervention Type DEVICE

Flutter and bronchodilator exercises

Flutter + bronchodilator exercises with an interval of 3 to 5 days

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Breathing exercises with flutter device Airway clearance technique Breathing exercises with flutter-sham device Airway clearance technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- patients with COPD meeting the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, with forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) \<80% predicted, FEV1/FVC ratio \<70% predicted (FVC= forced vital capacity), and total lung capacity (TLC) \>80% predicted), with or without sputum, will be included.

The severity of COPD will be classified according to GOLD criteria:

Stage I: mild FEV1/FVC\<0.70 and FEV1\>80% predicted; Stage II: moderate FEV1/FVC\<0.70 and 50\<FEV1\<80% predicted; Stage III: severe FEV1/FVC\<0.70 and 30\<FEV1\<50% predicted; Stage IV: very severe FEV1/FVC\<0.70 and FEV1\<30% or FEV1\<50% predicted plus chronic respiratory failure,

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with:

* Upper respiratory tract infection within the previous 28 days
* Treatment with antibiotics within 4 weeks prior the study
* Acute dyspnoea or hemoptysis
* Chest pain or recent history of rib fracture or pneumothorax
* Acute cardiovascular events in the previous 3 months
* Any history or evidence of renal, gastrointestinal or hepatic disease
* Any history and evidence of neuropsychiatric disease
* Alcohol, drug abuse or any other condition associated with poor compliance
* Breast feeding
* Pregnancy
* Other complications that hinder the completion of the tests
* Unable to provide written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Omar Usmani, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Imperial College London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Asthma Lab, Royal Brompton Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gastaldi AC, Paredi P, Talwar A, Meah S, Barnes PJ, Usmani OS. Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure on Respiratory Resistance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With a Small Amount of Secretion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1845. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001845.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26496331 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4620777/

Gastaldi AC, et al. Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure on Respiratory Resistance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With a Small Amount of Secretion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94(42): 1-8.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13/C0346

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fan Therapy in COPD Patients
NCT03137524 COMPLETED NA