Trial Outcomes & Findings for Acute Effects of a Flutter Device in COPD (NCT NCT01832961)
NCT ID: NCT01832961
Last Updated: 2020-02-27
Results Overview
Airways resistance were measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS) method.
COMPLETED
NA
15 participants
Baseline test, after breathing exercises with flutter or flutter-sham device and after 20 minutes of rest
2020-02-27
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Flutter Valve, Then Flutter Sham and Flutter+Bronchodilator
Visit 1: medical history, physical examination and written informed consent
Visit 2: FeNO, IOS and spirometry + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
Visit 3: FeNO, IOS and spirometry + 30 minutes of flutter-sham exercises
Visit 4: FeNO, IOS and spirometry + bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter Sham, Then Flutter Valve and Flutter+Bronchodilator
Visit 1: medical history, physical examination and written informed consent
Visit 2: FeNO, IOS and spirometry + 30 minutes of flutter-sham exercises
Visit 3: FeNO, IOS and spirometry + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
Visit 4: FeNO, IOS and spirometry + bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
STARTED
|
8
|
7
|
|
First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
8
|
7
|
|
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout
STARTED
|
8
|
7
|
|
Washout
COMPLETED
|
8
|
7
|
|
Washout
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention
STARTED
|
8
|
7
|
|
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
8
|
7
|
|
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Third Intervention
STARTED
|
8
|
7
|
|
Third Intervention
COMPLETED
|
8
|
7
|
|
Third Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Patient
n=15 Participants
All volunteers had a following treatments as crossover design Visit 1: medical history, physical examination and written informed consent
Visit 2: FeNO, IOS and spirometry + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
Visit 3: FeNO, IOS and spirometry + 30 minutes of flutter-sham exercises
Visit 4: FeNO, IOS and spirometry + bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=15 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
15 participants
n=15 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline test, after breathing exercises with flutter or flutter-sham device and after 20 minutes of restPopulation: Patients with COPD, without upper respiratory tract infection or treatment with antibiotics within 4 weeks prior the study; without acute dyspnea or hemoptysis, and no recent history of rib fractures or pneumothorax. In the Flutter-sham Control group after 20 minutes of rest - no data was collected.
Airways resistance were measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS) method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flutter Exercises Session
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter+Bronchodilator Session
n=15 Participants
Bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter-sham - Control Group
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of exercise with flutter-sham device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
R5 (kPa/L/s) Baseline
|
0.63 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.61 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
0.58 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
R5 (kPa/L/s) Immediately after
|
0.68 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.63 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
0.60 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
R5 (kPa/L/s) After 20 minutes of rest
|
0.61 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.56 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
NA kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation NA
No data was collected from this group after 20 minuted of rest.
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
R20 (kPa/L/s) Baseline
|
0.42 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.41 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.40 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
R20 (kPa/L/s) Immediately after
|
0.43 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.42 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.41 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
R20 (kPa/L/s) After 20 minutes of rest
|
0.41 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.39 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
NA kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation NA
No data was collected from this group after 20 minuted of rest.
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
R5-R20 (kPa/L/s) Baseline
|
0.21 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.20 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.19 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
R5-R20 (kPa/L/s) Immediately after
|
0.25 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.21 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.19 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
R5-R20 (kPa/L/s) After 20 minutes of rest
|
0.20 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.18 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
NA kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation NA
No data was collected from this group after 20 minuted of rest.
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
X5 (kPa/L/s) Baseline
|
-0.27 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.27 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.23 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
X5 (kPa/L/s) Immediately after
|
-0.28 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.25 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.24 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS)
X5 (kPa/L/s) After 20 minutes of rest
|
-0.26 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.25 kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
NA kPa/L/s
Standard Deviation NA
No data was collected from this group after 20 minuted of rest.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline test, after breathing exercises with flutter or flutter-sham device and after 20 minutes of restPopulation: No data was collected from the Flutter-sham Control group after 20 minutes of rest.
Airways resistance were measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS) method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flutter Exercises Session
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter+Bronchodilator Session
n=15 Participants
Bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter-sham - Control Group
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of exercise with flutter-sham device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS) - Reactance Area (Ax)
Ax (kPa/L) Baseline
|
-0.13 kPa/L
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.19 kPa/L
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
1.89 kPa/L
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS) - Reactance Area (Ax)
Ax (kPa/L) Immediately after
|
-0.06 kPa/L
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
-0.20 kPa/L
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
2.22 kPa/L
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS) - Reactance Area (Ax)
Ax (kPa/L) After 20 minutes of rest
|
-0.10 kPa/L
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.18 kPa/L
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
NA kPa/L
Standard Deviation NA
No data was collected from this group after 20 minutes of rest.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline test, after breathing exercises with flutter or flutter-sham device and after 20 minutes of restPopulation: No data was collected from the Flutter-sham Control group after 20 minutes of rest.
Airways resistance were measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS) method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flutter Exercises Session
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter+Bronchodilator Session
n=15 Participants
Bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter-sham - Control Group
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of exercise with flutter-sham device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS) - Resonant Frequency (Fres)
Fres (Hz) Baseline
|
24.95 Hz
Standard Deviation 4.03
|
22.54 Hz
Standard Deviation 7.70
|
22.13 Hz
Standard Deviation 5.71
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS) - Resonant Frequency (Fres)
Fres (Hz) Immediately after
|
26.15 Hz
Standard Deviation 4.78
|
23.49 Hz
Standard Deviation 6.14
|
22.41 Hz
Standard Deviation 8.24
|
|
Airways Resistance (IOS) - Resonant Frequency (Fres)
Fres (Hz) After 20 minutes of rest
|
24.24 Hz
Standard Deviation 4.29
|
21.85 Hz
Standard Deviation 7.01
|
NA Hz
Standard Deviation NA
No data was collect from this group after 20 minutes of rest.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and immediately after interventionPopulation: Patients with COPD, without upper respiratory tract infection or treatment with antibiotics within 4 weeks prior the study; without acute dyspnea or hemoptysis and no recent history of rib fracture or pneumothorax.
Exhaled nitric oxide will be measured by chemiluminescence method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flutter Exercises Session
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter+Bronchodilator Session
n=15 Participants
Bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter-sham - Control Group
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of exercise with flutter-sham device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)
Baseline
|
40.5 parts per billion
Standard Deviation 29.9
|
44.4 parts per billion
Standard Deviation 33.7
|
32.3 parts per billion
Standard Deviation 29.4
|
|
Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)
After intervention
|
39.3 parts per billion
Standard Deviation 33.7
|
43.6 parts per billion
Standard Deviation 33.2
|
31.7 parts per billion
Standard Deviation 32.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and immediately after interventionPopulation: Patients with COPD, without upper respiratory tract infection or treatment with antibiotics within 4 weeks prior the study; without acute dyspnea or hemoptysis and no recent history of rib fracture or pneumothorax.
Forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured using a dry wedge spirometer (Jaeger Co, Wurzburg, Germany)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flutter Exercises Session
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter+Bronchodilator Session
n=15 Participants
Bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter-sham - Control Group
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of exercise with flutter-sham device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Spirometry - Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Baseline FVC (%)
|
109.4 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 18.4
|
109.8 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 19.6
|
105.8 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
|
Spirometry - Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
After intervention FVC (%)
|
107.3 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 18.1
|
109.0 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
102.1 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 18.0
|
|
Spirometry - Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Baseline FEV1 (%)
|
67.6 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 17.7
|
67.0 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 17.3
|
62.1 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 16.7
|
|
Spirometry - Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
After intervention FEV1 (%)
|
66.0 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
65.3 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
60.3 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 17.1
|
|
Spirometry - Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Baseline FEV1/FVC (%)
|
51.0 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
50.3 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
48.5 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
|
Spirometry - Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
After intervention FEV1/FVC (%)
|
51.0 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
49.7 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
48.9 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
|
Spirometry - Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Baseline MEF 25-75 (%)
|
18.93 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 8.0
|
17.8 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 6.8
|
15.7 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 6.4
|
|
Spirometry - Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
After intervention MEF 25-75 (%)
|
18.0 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 7.1
|
17.6 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 6.9
|
15.1 percent predicted spirometry assessment
Standard Deviation 7.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During each sessionPopulation: Patients with COPD, without upper respiratory tract infection or treatment with antibiotics within 4 weeks prior the study; without acute dyspnea or hemoptysis and no recent history of rib fracture or pneumothorax.
Number of spontaneously reported cough episodes during each visit were collected.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flutter Exercises Session
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter+Bronchodilator Session
n=15 Participants
Bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter-sham - Control Group
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of exercise with flutter-sham device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cough
|
3.95 Coughs
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
1.69 Coughs
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
3.63 Coughs
Standard Deviation 3.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During each sessionPopulation: COPD patients without upper respiratory tract infection or treatment with antibiotics within 4 weeks prior the study; without acute dyspnea or hemoptysis and no recent history of a rib fracture or pneumothorax The volume fo secretion was obtained only for two groups: Flutter exercises and flutter-sham exercises.
Expectorated secretion volume during each visit were collected, weighted and classified with a purulence score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flutter Exercises Session
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter+Bronchodilator Session
n=15 Participants
Bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter-sham - Control Group
30 minutes of exercise with flutter-sham device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Secretion - Volume
|
2.54 grams
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
1.5 grams
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: In each sessionPopulation: COPD patients without upper respiratory tract infection or treatment with antibiotics within 4 weeks prior the study; without acute dyspnea or hemoptysis and no recent history of a rib fracture or pneumothorax.
The expectorated secretion was collected, weighted and classified with a purulence score based on a previously described numerical visual scale, which ranges from 1 (mucoid) to 5 (yellow/green). Referee of the Purulence score: Barnes PJ, Dweik RA, Gelb AF, et al. Exhaled nitric oxide in pulmonary diseases: a comprehensive review. Chest. 2010;138:682-692.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flutter Exercises Session
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter+Bronchodilator Session
n=15 Participants
Bronchodilator (Salbutamol) + 30 minutes of breathing exercises with flutter device
|
Flutter-sham - Control Group
n=15 Participants
30 minutes of exercise with flutter-sham device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Secretion - Purulence Score
|
2.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
2.57 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
2.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
Adverse Events
Flutter Exercises
Flutter-sham
Flutter+Bronchodilator
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place