Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques to Achieve Patella Symmetry During Resection

NCT ID: NCT01822574

Last Updated: 2016-03-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research was performed to determine which of the three techniques used by knee surgeons at the Mayo Clinic was the most accurate at the surgical removal (resection) of the knee-cap (patella) in a symmetric fashion during total knee replacement (arthroplasty). Although all three techniques are known to be effective, the three techniques had never been compared to one another to determine if one was more effective than the others at resecting the patella.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Resection of the patella to prepare it for placement of a patellar prosthesis is a procedure that is performed routinely in the vast majority of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in the United States and at the Mayo Clinic. This procedure is performed by a number of different techniques that have been proved to be safe and effective. Despite this, patellar instability, tilt, obliquity, and maltracking are all possible complications of improperly resected patellae during TKA. The goals of resection are to create a patella that is symmetrical, absent of obliquity (slanting), and thick enough to receive a patellar prosthesis. Although outcomes are generally good for most described methods, to date, little had been published regarding direct comparison of these methods.

Patients undergoing TKA with planned patellar resection were randomized to have their patella resected by one of three methods during primary TKA: 1) use of a cutting guide, 2) haptic feedback, or 3) free-hand resection guided by four quadrant measurements. There were three experienced fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons (hip and knee) performing the procedures who were all familiar and experienced with each of the three techniques being investigated. Each surgeon, within a group of 30 of their patients, performed a total 10 resections using each of the three methods listed above (30 resections per surgeon for a total of 90 resections).

Before and after resection measurements of knee-cap thickness were taken and used to determine patellar symmetry. The resulting symmetry of each of the three techniques was then be compared between and within each of the three techniques and surgeons. Each procedure was also be timed from first measurement by the staff surgeon to the final measurement by that surgeon.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Injuries, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cutting Guide Technique

The guide is clamped onto the patella and tightened so that it remains stable. The guide has a slot that allows insertion of a standard sagittal saw blade, and this slot guides the blade as it is advanced across the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cutting Guide Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The guide is clamped onto the patella and tightened so that it remains stable. The guide has a slot that allows insertion of a standard sagittal saw blade, and this slot guides the blade as it is advanced across the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Haptic Feedback Technique

It consists of a free hand cut (no guide used) with a standard sagittal saw that is oriented based on osteo-cartilaginous landmarks and haptic palpation of the patella by the surgeon. The resection thickness/obliquity can be altered based on haptic feedback (use of the sense of touch) of the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Haptic Feedback Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

It consists of a free hand cut (no guide used) with a standard sagittal saw that is oriented based on osteo-cartilaginous landmarks and haptic palpation of the patella by the surgeon. The resection thickness/obliquity can be altered based on haptic feedback (use of the sense of touch) of the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Four Quadrant Technique

Resection is performed in a free handed fashion, but after resection, the thickness of the patella is measured separately in all four quadrants (superolateral, superomedial, inferomedial, and inferolateral). Additional resection is performed as needed based on the quadrant measurements and the measurements are repeated after each resection until satisfactory resection thickness and symmetry are obtained.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Four Quadrant Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Resection is performed in a free handed fashion, but after resection, the thickness of the patella is measured separately in all four quadrants (superolateral, superomedial, inferomedial, and inferolateral). Additional resection is performed as needed based on the quadrant measurements and the measurements are repeated after each resection until satisfactory resection thickness and symmetry are obtained.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cutting Guide Technique

The guide is clamped onto the patella and tightened so that it remains stable. The guide has a slot that allows insertion of a standard sagittal saw blade, and this slot guides the blade as it is advanced across the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Haptic Feedback Technique

It consists of a free hand cut (no guide used) with a standard sagittal saw that is oriented based on osteo-cartilaginous landmarks and haptic palpation of the patella by the surgeon. The resection thickness/obliquity can be altered based on haptic feedback (use of the sense of touch) of the patella. The thickness is then measured in the center of the patella to ensure that the resection goal is achieved. Additional resection may be performed as needed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Four Quadrant Technique

Resection is performed in a free handed fashion, but after resection, the thickness of the patella is measured separately in all four quadrants (superolateral, superomedial, inferomedial, and inferolateral). Additional resection is performed as needed based on the quadrant measurements and the measurements are repeated after each resection until satisfactory resection thickness and symmetry are obtained.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty with planned patellar resection by one of the three staff surgeons included in the study.
* Patient must be able and willing to provide consent for study participation

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient in need of revision total knee arthroplasty or having already undergone prior total knee arthroplasty
* Patient not in need of patellar resection during their primary total knee arthroplasty
* Unwilling or unable to provide consent for participation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Robert T. Trousdale

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Trousdale, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Camp CL, Martin JR, Krych AJ, Taunton MJ, Spencer-Gardner L, Trousdale RT. Resection Technique Does Affect Resection Symmetry and Thickness of the Patella During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.038. Epub 2015 May 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26115983 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12-008219

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Comparative Study of Knee Systems
NCT01331278 COMPLETED PHASE4