Functional Outcome in Two Types of Total Knee Replacement Surgery for People With Osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT01576445

Last Updated: 2012-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When performing total knee replacement surgery, the surgeon has a choice as to which type of surgical technique to use. The standard technique at the Royal Infirmary in Edinburgh is the so-called 'medial parapatellar' exposure. And alternative and more recently introduced technique is the 'Mid-vastus approach' in which the surgeon will cut through less of the muscle at the front of the leg. In this study we compare the two surgical techniques in a so-called randomized trial. This means that we put people randomly into two groups, one group will receive surgery with the 'Mid-vastus approach' and the other group the surgery with the 'Medial parapatellar approach'. It is hypothesized that people who receive the Mid-vastus approach recover quicker and have a better short-term functional outcome than people who receive the 'Medial parapatellar approach'.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a prospective randomized controlled double blind trial in which both immediate post-operative recovery and functional outcome at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after total knee replacement surgery will be assessed for two different types of surgical approach; Medial Parapatellar and Mid-vastus.

Functional outcome will be assessed by recording the kinematics of the lower limb joints in addition to muscle activity (electromyography) during walking, stair ascending and descending and getting up from a chair through computerized 3D motion analysis. Outcome measures will be recorded immediate post surgery and at medium follow-up and will cover all areas of the World Health Organisation, International Components of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) components 'Body Structures and Functions/Impairments' ,'Activities and Participation' and 'Personal factors'. It is hypothesized that by minimizing the damage to the quadriceps, patients operated using the Mid-vastus approach will have better muscle function and will therefore have more normal knee range of motion, knee joint loading and muscle activity patterns compared to those with the Medial Parapatellar approach.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mid-vastus approach

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mid-vastus approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mid-vastus approach to avoid patellar eversion and to minimise the muscle split.

medial parapatellar approach

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

medial parapatellar approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

medial parapatellar approach

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mid-vastus approach

Mid-vastus approach to avoid patellar eversion and to minimise the muscle split.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

medial parapatellar approach

medial parapatellar approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Total knee arthroplasty
* Osteoarthritis
* Surgery at Royal Infirmary Edinburgh by participating surgeons

Exclusion Criteria

* A Body Mass Index of more than 40
* Fixed valgus deformity of more than 15 degrees
* Inflammatory polyarthritis
* disorders of the feet, ankles or hips or spine causing abnormal gait or significant pain
* dementia
* severe visual impairment
* neurological conditions affecting movement
* inability to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

DePuy International

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Queen Margaret University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marietta van der Linden

Research Fellow Physiotherapy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New Royal infirmary Edinburgh

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MIS1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The personalKNEE Trial
NCT06507046 RECRUITING NA