Anatomic Reconstruction of the Patellofemoral Joint

NCT ID: NCT01375231

Last Updated: 2014-06-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators posit that it would be advantageous to reproduce the height of the entire patellofemoral joint in order to maintain the lever arm of the quadriceps mechanism at its preoperative level. Failure to do this may cause the quadriceps mechanism to be inefficient. For example the quadriceps mechanism would have to work harder if the total patellofemoral (PF) height is diminished. Alternatively, diminished motion or increased patellar strain may occur if the overall PF height is increased. The investigators theorize that either of these sizing errors could lead to anterior knee pain. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes between two surgical techniques: 1) a technique of reproducing the total PF joint on both sides of the articulation (Group 1) and 2) the traditional technique of reproducing only the patellar thickness on one side of the joint (Group 2).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is no consensus on the source of the anterior pain or the most efficacious treatment. Multiple etiologies have been theorized concerning the cause of this problem including tibiofemoral instability, patellofemoral (PF) instability, PF maltracking and patella stress fractures. It has been reported that patellofemoral forces are associated with anterior knee pain. Moreover, it has been reported that a correlation exists between the tension of the quadriceps muscle and the forces on the patella. In a biomechanical, cadaver study, Browne et al. found that a longer extensor moment arm reduced the tension on the quadriceps and reduced the patellar forces.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Replacement Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Measured Resection of patellofemoral joint

The goal is to remove an amount of bone from the patella so that when reconstructed, the composite thickness of the entire prosthetic patellofemoral joint is recreated

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Measured Resection of patellofemoral joint

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The goal is to remove an amount of bone from the patella so that when reconstructed, the composite thickness of the entire prosthetic patellofemoral joint is recreated

Measured resection of patella

The thickness of the anterior condyle is not considered in this measurement. The goal is to restore the composite thickness of the patella only.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Measured resection of patella

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The thickness of the anterior condyle is not considered in this measurement. The goal is to restore the composite thickness of the patella only.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Measured Resection of patellofemoral joint

The goal is to remove an amount of bone from the patella so that when reconstructed, the composite thickness of the entire prosthetic patellofemoral joint is recreated

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Measured resection of patella

The thickness of the anterior condyle is not considered in this measurement. The goal is to restore the composite thickness of the patella only.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients presenting for a primary total knee replacement who have failed conservative medical management.
2. Total knee replacement includes patella resurfacing.
3. Patient is willing and able to understand, sign, and date the study specific patient informed consent, to volunteer participation in the study.
4. Patient is psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to comply with the requirements of the study including post-op clinical evaluations and completion of questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients presenting for a unicompartmental knee replacement.
2. Patients presenting for a revision total knee replacement.
3. Total knee replacement does not include patella resurfacing.
4. Patients with angular deformity greater than 15 degrees.
5. Patients with subluxation/dislocation of the patella.
6. Patients with severe patellar bone loss.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Fehring, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

OrthoCarolina Research Institute/OrthoCarolina

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id