Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-09-30
2012-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The traditional method used to treat this type of pain uses multiple injections to target the nerves supplying the joint. This method is however both time consuming and the results are variable depending upon the number of injections. Therefore a new electrode, called the Simplicity III®, was developed to allow the treatment to be undertaken using fewer injections. Although this treatment has received formal approval, undergone conformity assessment and is available in certain specialist NHS centres for clinical use, there is presently limited evidence with regards to its clinical efficacy. We wish to test the effectiveness of this new device in treating sacroiliac joint pain. The best way to prove the clinical effectiveness is to compare Simplicity III® against an identical procedure where the electrode is not switched on and neither the patient nor the doctor is aware whether it was switched on. Once pain has been assessed at 3 months, those patients not receiving active treatment and remaining in pain will be offered the active treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound-guided Sacroiliac Joint Radiofrequency Ablation: A Pilot Study
NCT02335190
Palisade Lateral Branch Technique Using Multi-tined Needles for Sacro-iliac Joint Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT05043961
Radiofrequency Nerve Ablation Versus Sham to Treat Chronic Low Back Pain Caused by Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
NCT01104051
A Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Denervation for Sacroiliac (SI) Joint Pain
NCT00373724
Trial Comparing Treatment With SInergy™ System to Conservative Treatment for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain
NCT01158092
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Radiofrequency neurotomy
Active Radiofrequency Neurotomy
Comparison of active versus sham radiofrequency neurotomy with Simplicity III
Sham
Sham radiofrequency neurotomy
Comparison of active versus sham radiofrequency neurotomy with Simplicity III
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Comparison of active versus sham radiofrequency neurotomy with Simplicity III
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age: 18 - 80 years old
3. Low back pain of more than 6 months duration with a minimum pain intensity of greater than 5 out of 10 on an 11-point numerical rating scale in the 7 days preceding study entry.
4. Subjects must achieve greater than 80% reduction in pain following each diagnostic, intra-articular block. Subjects must undergo 2 blocks in total prior to randomisation.
5. Female subjects of potential childbearing age must be using adequate contraception (i.e. using oral or intramuscular contraception or an IUCD) and must have a negative urine test.
6. No vulnerable patient groups shall be recruited into this study
2. Subjects who have previously been treated by any sacroiliac joint radiofrequency neurotomy
3. Subjects who are breastfeeding
4. Contraindications to local anaesthetics and radiofrequency neurotomy as listed in their respective summary of product characteristics
5. Subjects with documented or suspected alcohol or drug abuse, or who are suspected of having an addictive personality
6. Subjects to whom any of the following apply: Major trauma to the lumbar spine in the six months preceding study entry. Infection in the lumbar spine in the six months preceding study entry
7. Subjects' known to have a condition that, in the investigator's judgment precludes entry into the study.
8. Subjects with a significant psychiatric disorder (including depression) or subjects receiving anti-psychotic medication.
9. Subjects who have received an investigational drug or have used an investigational device in the 30 days preceding study entry.
10. Subjects unable to comply with the study assessments or unable to complete the questionnaires.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Barts & The London NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vivek Mehta, MD FRCA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Sibtain Anwar, MA MB FRCA
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Barts Health NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mehta V, Poply K, Husband M, Anwar S, Langford R. The Effects of Radiofrequency Neurotomy Using a Strip-Lesioning Device on Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Results from a Single-Center, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):607-618.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Reda 7869
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.