Radiofrequency Neurotomy for Chronic Facet Joint Related Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT03066960

Last Updated: 2023-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a single-center, double blind, sham-controlled randomized trial (N: 34) to assess the long term efficacy of RF neurotomy of cervical medial branches. Patients with chronic unilateral neck pain who are found eligible and achieve ≥50% pain relief of two predictive and comparative test blocks will be included in the trial in a primary analysis. We will further test whether a strict selection of ≥80% pain relief better predicts efficacious RF neurotomy compared with a less strict selection of ≥50% to \<80%. After 6 months sham-treated patients may also be offered active unblinded RF treatment. Demographic and clinical data will be recorded at baseline while primary and secondary outcome measurements are recollected after 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Primary outcome measurements include self-reported neck function (NDI) and pain relief after 6 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic neck pain represents a common health problem. The mechanisms appear to be multifactorial. Researchers have suggested a disturbed interplay between the deep neck muscles and facet joints. In Europe and the US radiofrequency neurotomy has become a common treatment. The evidence base, however, is still insufficient. Thus, a double blind, sham-controlled, randomized, single-center trial is carried out. Based on current data and a single center study design, 34 randomized participants, completing the trial, have shown adequate to obtain sufficient statistical power. To simplify the data collection a digital internet based program is used. Patients with chronic unilateral neck pain, referred to Oslo University Hospital or responding to public announcements, and not responding to non-interventional treatment will be screened. Those who are found eligible and achieve ≥50% pain relief after predictive and comparative test blocks, will be included in the study. We will further test whether a strict selection of ≥80% pain relief better predicts efficacious RF neurotomy compared with a less strict selection of ≥50% to \<80%. After 6 months participants who received sham and still suffer from neck pain, will be offered unblinded RF neurotomy and additional 12 month unblinded follow up if the results support this treatment. Demographic and clinical data will be recorded at baseline. The primary and secondary outcome measurements are recollected after 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Primary outcome measurements include self-reported neck function (NDI) and pain relief after 6 months. Regression analyses will be used to identify how pain relief of two test blocks and pain catastrophizing predict response to RF neurotomy. If RF neurotomy is found superior to sham treatment, this may be implemented in the national treatment program for selected patients with chronic neck pain.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

radiofrequency neurotomy zygapophyseal joint

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radiofrequency neurotomy group

Unilateral radiofrequency neurotomy of medial branches to the dorsal ramus at one or two cervical levels

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radiofrequency neurotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

RF neurotomy represents a nerve destructive, coagulating technique affecting the conduction through all nerve fibers.

Sham group

Unilateral sham treatment of medial branches to the dorsal ramus at one or two cervical levels

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sham treatment represents no coagulation of the nerve and will not affect the nerve conduction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radiofrequency neurotomy

RF neurotomy represents a nerve destructive, coagulating technique affecting the conduction through all nerve fibers.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sham treatment

Sham treatment represents no coagulation of the nerve and will not affect the nerve conduction.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Min 18 years and Maximum 80 years
* Read and understand Norwegian
* Stable neck pain \>12 months, with or without unilateral headache
* Average of worst pain intensity last three days ≥ 4 out of maximum 10
* Neck Disability Index \>15 points or \> 30 percentage points.
* At least two predictive blocks ≥ 50% pain relief 30 to 60 minutes after lidocaine and 30 to 180 minutes after bupivacaine .

Exclusion Criteria

* Serious cervical pathology (acute cervical disc herniation, radiculopathy, myelopathy, spinal anomalies and chronic widespread pain
* Opioid consumption \> 50 morphine equivalents/day
* Ongoing litigation process and applying for disability insurance/benefits
* Serious psychiatric disorder (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosed at a psychiatric unit, including suicidal thoughts and somatization (from Hopkins Symptom Check List 25 ≥ 2.5)
* Ongoing addictive behavior ( diagnostic criteria in Statistical Manual, 4th Edition)
* Unstable medical condition (ASA 4, serious vascular disease like unstable angina)
* Bacterial infection
* Malignancy
* Chronic generalized pain
* Hypersensitive to contrast agents or local anesthetics
* Pregnancy
* Bleeding diathesis
* Previously radiofrequency neurotomy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Olavs Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gunnvald Kvarstein

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gunnvald Kvarstein, Dr. Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oslo University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department for Pain and Complex Disorders

Trondheim, Torgarden, Norway

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Pain Management and Research Oslo University Hospital

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Gunnvald Kvarstein, Dr. Med

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +47 92295309

Email: [email protected]

Bård Lundeland, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +47 41238959

Email: 'Bård Lundeland' <[email protected]>

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Petter Borchgrevink, PhD

Role: primary

Gunnvald Kvarstein, PhD

Role: primary

Bård Lundeland, PhD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015/2194

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id