RFD Versus Cervical Medial Branch Blocks in Chronic Degenerative Neck Pain
NCT ID: NCT01743326
Last Updated: 2015-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-11-30
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: to evaluate the effect of Radio Frequency treatment in patients with chronic degenerative neck pain.
Study design: prospective, randomized, double blinded clinical trial. Study population: patients older than 25 years, referred to the University Pain Center of Maastricht and the Pain Center of Amphia hospital Breda, with chronic axial neck pain.
Intervention: patients with at least 3 months of neck pain without radiation to the arm (only radiation beyond the shoulder) will be randomized in 2 groups. The first group (RFD + local anesthesia-group=intervention group) will receive RF treatment adjacent to the medial branch innervating the cervical facet joints after the application of bupivacaine 0.5 ml (0.25%). The second group (local anesthesia-group=control group) will only receive the application of 0.5 ml bupivacaine (0.25%) adjacent to the medial branch. The only difference between the two groups is the RF-denervation of the medial branches.
Main study parameters/endpoints: the primary research question is to evaluate the extent of pain reduction induced by RF treatment (RFD + local anesthesia-group=intervention group) compared with the local anesthesia-group(control group.
Following evaluation tools are used : Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Patient global Impression of Change on a 7 point Likert Scale (PGIC), consumption of pain medication (MQS), Patient Specific Functional Scale, Quality of life scale (RAND 36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS), and Neck Disability Index (NDI, Dutch version).
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients in the RFD + Local Anesthesia-group and Local Anesthesia-group will undergo a physical examination before and 6 weeks after the intervention, by an independent third party, this will be repeated at 3 and 6 months if abnormalities are observed. At each of these time points the patients will receive questionnaires to fill out. A puncture of a blood vessel is possible, diagnosed by injection of contrast, for which repositioning of the needle is needed. Should accidental intravascular injection of local anesthetic occur, the dose used is low and reports show that intravascular injection of bupivacaine 2,5 mg does not pose clinical problems. The dura can be punctured; as a consequence contrast will flow in the cerebrospinal fluid. The procedure will be stopped and repeated after a few days. In theory a lesion of the nerve root is possible, but the needles are designed to avoid this, this complication has not been seen since more than 10 years. Up till now, a transient pain is occasionally described after the RF treatment. No hypesthesia or motor complications were reported. Since the risks of RF treatment are reported low and more related to needle placement there is no difference in risk and burden between the two treatment groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Radiofrequency-treatment on Patients With Facet-joint Pain in Cervical- and Lumbar-columna
NCT00476684
Pulsed vs Continuous Radiofrequency Neurotomy for Cervical Facet Joint Mediated Pain
NCT04124445
Radiofrequency Neurotomy for Chronic Facet Joint Related Neck Pain
NCT03066960
Radiofrequency Plus Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis Pain
NCT06480175
Effects of Radio-frequency in Patients With Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain
NCT02353195
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RFD-group
Radio Frequency Denervation
Radio Frequency Denervation
Local Anesthesia
Local Anesthesia-group
Local Anesthesia-group
Local Anesthesia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radio Frequency Denervation
Local Anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signs of degeneration on lateral X-ray
* Cervical facets to be treated between C2 and C7
* Pain for at least 3 months and conservative treatment medication (=paracetamol, Non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAID) and/or physical therapy) prior to referral to the pain clinic
* Neck pain on a Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 5
Exclusion Criteria
* Shoulder pain/pathology
* The complaints are directly related to traumatic event e.g. Whiplash (WAD)
* Patient is pregnant, or pregnancy is suspected
* Patient has a cardiac pacemaker, automatic defibrillator or any leads in the neck area
* Allergy to contrast media or drugs to be used in the procedure
* History of anterior fusion at the cervical level to be treated
* Patient is simultaneously participating in another device or drug study related to cervical pain.
* Patient has a spinal fracture, tumor or infection.
* Patient has a central cord lesion in the cervical spine
* Neurologic deficit
* Evidence of disc herniation (extruded, sequestered on MRI imaging)
25 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maarten van Kleef, Prf. MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
METC 12-2-031
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.