Ultrasound-guided Selective Cervical Root Pulsed Radiofrequency Therapy in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain
NCT ID: NCT06298747
Last Updated: 2024-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
45 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-11-01
2023-07-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency for Cervical Radiculopathy: a Randomized, Sham-controlled, Double-blind Pilot Study
NCT07207356
Combined Continuous and Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for Pain Relief and Their Safety in Cervical Facet Pain
NCT05719948
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Lumbar Facet-Related Pain
NCT06157294
Suprascapular Nerve PRF for Central Sensitization and Neuropathic Pain
NCT06857409
Radiofrequency Treatments for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain Management
NCT06695481
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pain intensity was evaluated at baseline and 1,3 and 6 months after US-guided selective cervical nerve root PRF treatment using VAS (Visual analog scale). The primary outcome measure was percent reduction in pain, with 50% pain relief lasting at least 6 months was defined as a positive categorical outcome.
Patients' functionality and neuropathic pain status were assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4) at baseline and 1,3 and 6 months after US-guided selective cervical nerve root PRF treatment, respectively. Secondary outcome measure was defined as a positive categorical outcome of 50% or more improvement in these scores for at least 6 months.
In addition, demographic data such as age (years), gender, duration of pain (months), pain side (right or left), affected cervical nerve root level (one or multiple levels), and history of surgery for cervical disc herniation and analgesic use (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opioids) were obtained from patient data and retrospectively analyzed the patient's electronic medical history records.
The primary aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of US-SCNR PRF treatment, and the clinical and demographic variables associated with treatment outcomes. The secondary aim of this study was to determine the improvement in functionality and neuropathic pain status of patients after the procedure, and treatment-related adverse events.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency
A 5-12 MHz linear US probe was used during the procedure. C7 has a more prominent posterior tubercle and a rudimentary anterior tubercle. C5 and C6 have more prominent and smooth anterior and posterior tubercles, respectively. After visualizing the hypoechoic nerve root between the tubercles of the transverse process, the surrounding vascular structures were identified and RF canula is used. After approaching the hypoechoic nerve root, after sensory and motor stimulation, PRF was applied to each nerve root with a current of 1.0-1.2 V at a frequency of 2 Hz for 4 minutes at 42 °C.
Selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency
A 5-12 MHz linear US probe was used during the procedure. C7 has a more prominent posterior tubercle and a rudimentary anterior tubercle. C5 and C6 have more prominent and smooth anterior and posterior tubercles, respectively. After visualizing the hypoechoic nerve root between the tubercles of the transverse process, the surrounding vascular structures were identified and RF canula is used. After approaching the hypoechoic nerve root, after sensory and motor stimulation, PRF was applied to each nerve root.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency
A 5-12 MHz linear US probe was used during the procedure. C7 has a more prominent posterior tubercle and a rudimentary anterior tubercle. C5 and C6 have more prominent and smooth anterior and posterior tubercles, respectively. After visualizing the hypoechoic nerve root between the tubercles of the transverse process, the surrounding vascular structures were identified and RF canula is used. After approaching the hypoechoic nerve root, after sensory and motor stimulation, PRF was applied to each nerve root.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* radicular pain radiating only to the neck and one arm for more than 12 weeks
* no response to conservative treatment (including analgesics and physiotherapy modalities)
* access to clinical data
Exclusion Criteria
* patients lost to follow-up within six months after the procedure
* history of malignancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Damla Yürük
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ömer Taylan Akkaya, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Cervical root PRF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.