Effectiveness of Physical Therapy Treatments of Myofascial Trigger Points in Subjects With Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT01869283

Last Updated: 2013-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neck pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal dysfunction. Studies point that individuals with chronic pain have metabolic, vascular and electromyographic changes in trapezius muscle. Moreover, a common clinical sign in this muscle in subjects with neck pain is the presence of myofascial trigger points. These are related to the sensory, motor and autonomic changes, being defined as palpable nodules located in the taut band of skeletal muscle. In this context, the focus on treatment modalities stands out in the literature, however, other resources commonly used in clinical practice still lack scientific evidence. Therefore, the aim of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy resources in the treatment of myofascial trigger points in the trapezius muscle of patients with neck pain. For such, volunteers with neck pain for more than 90 days, of both genders, aged between 18 and 59 years and bilateral myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius will be randomized into the following groups: group 1 (kinesiotherapy, n = 20), group 2 (kinesiotherapy + static ultrasound, n = 20), group 3 (kinesiotherapy + diadynamic currents, n = 20) and group 4 (untreated control, n = 20). Volunteers will undergo ten sessions of treatment, being realized the following evaluations: surface electromyography, infrared thermography, numerical scale of pain assessment, algometry, Neck Disability Index and skin impedance. For data analysis, normality test will used to verify the data distribution and consistent statistical test for the appropriate comparisons within and between groups, and thus considered two factors in the comparisons, time and group. Will adopt a significance level of 5%.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Kinesiotherapy group

The volunteer will be subjected to the following protocol: cervical traction, 3 sets of 1 minute, 30-second rest between sets; mobilization grade III postero-anterior on the spines processes of vertebrae C2 to C7, 10 oscillations for each vertebrae; myofascial release of the upper trapezius muscle, 3 sets of 1 minute for each side; static stretching of the upper trapezius muscle, 3 sets of 30 seconds, with an interval of 10 seconds between sets.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Kinesiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

kinesiotherapy + static ultrasound group

Same protocol group kinesiotherapy + ultrasound on the trigger points of the upper trapezius muscle in a static way, with 1 MHz, continuous dose of 1.5 W/cm2, for 1.5 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Kinesiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

kinesiotherapy + diadynamic currents group

Same protocol group kinesiotherapy + diadynamic currents, with negative electrode (7.0 x 7.0 cm) placed on the myofascial trigger point, while the positive electrode (7.0 x 7.0 cm) is placed between the shoulder blades. Will apply 4 minutes from the biphasic mode (DF) and 6-minute short period (CP), the first of which intesidade the sensory threshold and the second threshold motor, both bearable for the patient.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Kinesiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Diadynamic currents

Intervention Type OTHER

Control group

The volunteers of this group will not be subjected to any form of treatment, was evaluated in three stages, as the other groups. It is noteworthy that, after the volunteer's participation, will be offered at the same physical therapy for myofascial pain.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Kinesiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

Diadynamic currents

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* neck pain for more than 90 days
* aged 18 to 59 years
* presence of trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle

Exclusion Criteria

* history of trauma to the neck
* surgery in the head, face or neck
* herniated cervical
* degenerative diseases of the spine
* systemic diseases
* underwent physical therapy in the last three months
* analgesics, anti-inflammatories or muscle relaxants last week
* medical diagnosis of fibromyalgia
* body mass index (BMI) greater than 28 kg/m2
* signs and symptoms of depression
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro

Professor, PT, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rinaldo Guirro, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Sao Paulo

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rinaldo Guirro, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+551636024584

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rinaldo Guirro, PhD

Role: primary

+551636024584

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1143-4456

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.