Effects of MR With TENS Conductive Glove in Adults With Neck Myofascial Syndrome.

NCT ID: NCT05367752

Last Updated: 2022-08-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-01

Study Completion Date

2022-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Myofascial neck syndrome has a high incidence in the general population and is characterized by the presence of painful trigger points in the neck muscles. Both the application of manual techniques such as myofascial release and the application of TENS currents to the painful points of the neck muscles have been proven to help reduce pain and improve the range of motion of the neck. 80 adults who will present at least one trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle will be randomly divided into four groups. In the first group, a combination therapy of myofascial release with conductive TENS glove will be applied, in the second group the same protocol of myofascial release without conductive glove, in the third group a high frequency (conventional) TENS, and the fourth group will get placebo TENS with the device closed. All participants will follow a total of six treatments over a period of three weeks with a follow-up after one month. The following will be evaluated before and after the intervention, as well as in the one-month follow-up: pain with the visual analog scale (VAS pain), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) in the upper trapezius muscle with a digital algometer, range of motion (ROM) of the neck with a goniometer, and functional ability with the "Neck Disability Index" (NDI) questionnaire.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Myofascial neck syndrome has a high incidence in the general population and is characterized by the presence of painful trigger points in the neck muscles. Both the application of manual techniques such as myofascial release (MR) and the application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) currents to the painful points of the neck muscles have been proven to help reduce pain and improve the range of motion of the neck.

Aim: To study the efficacy of the combination of MR and the simultaneous application of TENS currents in the painful points of the upper part of the trapezius muscle. The myofascial release protocol will be applied with a conductive glove, which will be connected to a TENS device so that the physiotherapist's hand can be used simultaneously as a mobile electrode.

Method: 80 adults who will present at least one trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle will be randomly divided into four groups. In the first group, a combination therapy of MR with a TENS conductive glove will be applied, in the second group the same protocol of myofascial release without conductive glove, in the third group a high frequency (conventional) TENS, and the fourth group will get placebo TENS with the device closed. All participants will follow a total of six treatments over a period of three weeks with a follow-up after one month. The following will be evaluated before and after the intervention, as well as in the one-month follow-up: pain with the visual analog scale (VAS pain), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) in the upper trapezius muscle with a digital algometer, range of motion (ROM) of the neck with a goniometer, and functional disability with the "Neck Disability Index" (NDI) questionnaire. For the statistical analysis of the results, a two-way ANOVA with repeated measurements will be applied.

Expected results: The combination protocol proposed in this clinical study combines the beneficial effects of TENS with the benefits of MR. For this reason, this combination is expected to be more effective than their individual application in improving the clinical picture of adults with myofascial neck syndrome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

An assessor-blind randomized control trial with a duration of three weeks and a one-month follow up will be performed in 80 adults with neck pain due to the presence of trigger points on the upper part of trapezius muscle. The participants will be allocated into four groups of 20 persons each (three intervention groups and one control group). In the first group, a combination therapy of myofascial release with conductive TENS gloves will be applied, in the second group the same protocol of myofascial release without conductive gloves, in the third group a high frequency (conventional) TENS, and the fourth group will get placebo TENS with the device closed. All participants will follow a total of six treatments over a period of three weeks.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Single (Outcomes Assessor) Assessor-blind randomized control trial. A masked assessor conducted the measurements.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1: Myofascial release with TENS conductive glove

Participants allocated to this group received six sessions of a myofascial release protocol with a TENS conductive glove applying a TENS current of 120Hz frequency through an electrotherapy device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Myofascial release with TENS conductive glove

Intervention Type OTHER

Before each MR session, light massage and stretching was applied for five minutes as preparation for the manipulations. The massage included the effleurage technique followed by petrissage and kneading on the cervical and thoracic areas (on the upper three parts of the trapezius muscle, in the suboccipital area, and on the paraspinal cervical muscles). Stretching was applied to the following muscles: upper part of the trapezius, levator scapulae, and the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

Upper trapezius myofascial release, unilateral gross stretch, vertical gross stretch, focused stretch, cranial base myofascial release, gross release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and release of the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles.

Group 2: Myofascial release without TENS conductive glove

Participants allocated to this group received the same myofascial release protocol with group 1 without the TENS conductive glove.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Myofascial release without TENS conductive glove

Intervention Type OTHER

Before each MR session, light massage and stretching was applied for five minutes as preparation for the manipulations. The massage included the effleurage technique followed by petrissage and kneading on the cervical and thoracic areas (on the upper three parts of the trapezius muscle, in the suboccipital area, and on the paraspinal cervical muscles). Stretching was applied to the following muscles: upper part of the trapezius, levator scapulae, and the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

Upper trapezius myofascial release, unilateral gross stretch, vertical gross stretch, focused stretch, cranial base myofascial release, gross release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and release of the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles.

Group 3: Conventional TENS

Participants allocated to this group received the application of a conventional TENS current.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional TENS

Intervention Type OTHER

Two 40\*50mm silicone electrodes were placed with the negative electrode on the trigger point of the trapezius muscle and the positive one on the acromion. The current frequency was 120Hz and pulse duration 80ms for 30 minutes. This protocol has been proposed by Ebadi et al. (2021)

Control: Sham TENS

Participants allocated to this group received the same TENS treatment with group 3, but with the current intensity set to zero to ensure that they received no current.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sham TENS

Intervention Type OTHER

Two 40\*50mm silicone electrodes were placed with the negative electrode on the trigger point of the trapezius muscle and the positive one on the acromion. The current frequency was 120Hz and pulse duration 80ms for 30 minutes. This protocol has been proposed by Ebadi et al. (2021)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Myofascial release with TENS conductive glove

Before each MR session, light massage and stretching was applied for five minutes as preparation for the manipulations. The massage included the effleurage technique followed by petrissage and kneading on the cervical and thoracic areas (on the upper three parts of the trapezius muscle, in the suboccipital area, and on the paraspinal cervical muscles). Stretching was applied to the following muscles: upper part of the trapezius, levator scapulae, and the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

Upper trapezius myofascial release, unilateral gross stretch, vertical gross stretch, focused stretch, cranial base myofascial release, gross release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and release of the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles.

Intervention Type OTHER

Myofascial release without TENS conductive glove

Before each MR session, light massage and stretching was applied for five minutes as preparation for the manipulations. The massage included the effleurage technique followed by petrissage and kneading on the cervical and thoracic areas (on the upper three parts of the trapezius muscle, in the suboccipital area, and on the paraspinal cervical muscles). Stretching was applied to the following muscles: upper part of the trapezius, levator scapulae, and the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

Upper trapezius myofascial release, unilateral gross stretch, vertical gross stretch, focused stretch, cranial base myofascial release, gross release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and release of the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles.

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional TENS

Two 40\*50mm silicone electrodes were placed with the negative electrode on the trigger point of the trapezius muscle and the positive one on the acromion. The current frequency was 120Hz and pulse duration 80ms for 30 minutes. This protocol has been proposed by Ebadi et al. (2021)

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham TENS

Two 40\*50mm silicone electrodes were placed with the negative electrode on the trigger point of the trapezius muscle and the positive one on the acromion. The current frequency was 120Hz and pulse duration 80ms for 30 minutes. This protocol has been proposed by Ebadi et al. (2021)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presence of at least one trigger point in the upper part of the trapezius muscle
* Age range 22-60 years
* Scoring 10% or higher on the Neck Disability Index
* Scoring of 20mm or more on the Visual Analogue Scale of pain at initial evaluation
* Written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* History of acute neck injury
* Sensory disorders in the neck area
* Diagnosis with a serious illness (cancer, severe osteoporosis, infectious or inflammatory processes, fractures, congenital anomalies)
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

International Hellenic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dimitrios Lytras

Dimitrios Lytras PT, PhD, Senior Lecturer of Physiotherapy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paris Iakovidis, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

International Hellenic University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences International Hellenic University

Thessaloniki, Sindos ThessalonĂ­ki, Greece

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Greece

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC-03/2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.