Technical Description of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Lumbar Medial Branches for the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Pain
NCT ID: NCT01590004
Last Updated: 2015-05-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
10 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Trial of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for theTreatment of Lumbar Facet Syndrome
NCT02478437
Effect of the Temperature Used in Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT02148003
Cooled RF Lesion MRI Characteristics
NCT03631030
The Effect of Radiofrequency-treatment on Patients With Facet-joint Pain in Cervical- and Lumbar-columna
NCT00476684
One-Needle Vs Three-Needle Radiofrequency in Low Back Pain Due to Facet Joint Arthritis
NCT05137652
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Aged between 18 and 75 years
3. Chronic lumbar pain for \> 6 months
4. 3-day average NRS score at least 4 and not greater than 8
5. Clinical features consistent with possible lumbar z-joint pain (such as pain and tenderness over not more than three segments unilaterally)
6. No adequate relief with conservative management, including physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, exercises, and drug therapy
7. Understand and tolerate lumbar medial branch diagnostic blocks
8. Positive for lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain after comparative diagnostic blocks (≥ 80% pain relief) per standard of care.
9. Understands study protocol and provides voluntary written consent to participate in study and outcome measurements
10. Normal neurological exam
11. Understands and agrees to use an acceptable form of birth control
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prior posterior lumbar fusion
3. Prior low back surgery
4. Concurrent cervical or thoracic pain or pain in these regions lasting longer than 2 weeks during the last 6 months
5. Compensable disability or work injury or ongoing litigation
6. Prior treatment with radiofrequency neurotomy in the lumbar region within 3 months
7. Discogenic pain verified by controlled discography
8. Sources of pain not in the lumbar spine
9. Leg pain greater than back pain
10. Obvious inappropriate pain behavior during physical exam
11. Neurologic deficits
12. Positive straight leg raising result
13. Any features of upper motor neuron lesion
14. Gait abnormality not attributable to spinal pain
15. Severe Central Spinal Canal Stenosis (\> 50%) evident on prior computed tomogram or magnetic resonance image
16. Spondylolysis
17. Spondylolisthesis
18. More than 75% narrowing of a disc space on plain radiographs
19. Spondyloarthropathy
20. Score higher than 20 on the Beck Depression Inventory
21. Patients addicted to alcohol, narcotics or other illegal substances
22. Dependence on opioids
23. Uncontrolled acute/chronic illness that may confound interpretation of outcome measures
24. Allergy to injectants, medication or anesthetics to be used
25. Active or uncontrolled rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune diseases
26. Patients with a history of mental instability or diagnosed with a mental disorder
27. Patient unwilling or unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits
28. The presence of a pacemaker in the patient
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Halyard Health
INDUSTRY
Mehul Desai
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mehul Desai
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mehul J Desai, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MAPS Applied Research Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MAPS Applied Research Center, Inc.
Edina, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
lumbar01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.