One-Needle Vs Three-Needle Radiofrequency in Low Back Pain Due to Facet Joint Arthritis

NCT ID: NCT05137652

Last Updated: 2024-08-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-08-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Failure of RFA has been attributed to technical failure of coagulating the nerve or coagulation of a minimal section of the nerve, allowing for early reinnervation. Consequently, increasing the success rate and duration of relief may require techniques that increase the likelihood of successful nerve ablation over a relevant distance by maximizing lesion size.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Low back pain (LBP) is more accurately called lumbago or lumbosacral pain, which is defined as discomfort, tension, or stiffness below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds. In Egypt, patients with LBP constituted a high percentage of patients seeking medical care at outpatient's clinics reaching about 48% making it one of the most common causes of disability in the working population. no large-scale retrospective studies have investigated long-term clinical predictors of success in individuals receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the medial branches for facet joint arthropathy. Employees who are unable to work due to back pain spend a significant amount of time on sick leave, which impacts the productivity in the work place. Risk factors for LBP are multifactorial, including exercise, obesity, smoking, age, and sex, and these can be grouped together as individual fa pctors. Low back pain can arise from multiple anatomic locations: the intervertebral discs that are positioned between the vertebral bodies of the spine, the facet joint, but also non bony structures such as the paravertebral muscles, ligaments, and fascia. Postmortem studies have revealed that intervertebral discs and facet joints exhibit the greatest degree of degeneration within the spine, thus indicating the potential role of these structures in causing low back pain. In patients with a structural cause of low back pain, up to 40% of cases likely arise from the lumbar facet joints. The etiology of lumbar facet-joint pain is thought to be stress and trauma to the joint, which subsequently leads to inflammation of the joint capsule. Treatment options for facet arthropathy range from conservative management with medications and physical therapy to interventional management, including facet-joint injections and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the medial branches of the posterior rami to the facet joints. RFA of the medial branches of the dorsal rami is thought to be the most effective interventional treatment for facet joint pain and has been reported to relieve pain for 6 months to 1 year in 60% of patients. Although providing benefit in a significant proportion of patients, there remains a group of patients who do not experience any pain relief from RFA or experience only benefit from the ablation for a short period.

Failure of RFA has been attributed to technical failure of coagulating the nerve or coagulation of a minimal section of the nerve, allowing for early reinnervation. Consequently, increasing the success rate and duration of relief may require techniques that increase the likelihood of successful nerve ablation over a relevant distance by maximizing lesion size.

The aim of this technical note is to detail a two-needle approach to lumbar medial branch RF denervation to maximize lesion size along the course of the medial branch nerve.

VAS scores were based on self-reported measures of lumbar back pain and were recorded as a continuum between 2 ends of a scale, with "no pain" corresponding to the left end of the scale (0 cm) and "worst pain" corresponding to the right end of the scale (10 cm). The VAS is a validated, subjective tool to measure both acute and chronic pain. Pre-procedural VAS pain scores were documented prior to the lumbar RFA procedure (pre-VAS) and during the following time points after lumbar medial branch RFA was performed: short-term (1-week to 1-month), 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year visits.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Facet Joint Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

single needle approach for 40 patients in which nerve is traditionally been targeted.

Group Type OTHER

Radiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using single needle approach

Intervention Type DEVICE

The primary outcome is to study the efficacy of the described technique which creates a lesion that we estimate to be 11.0-mm wide and 11.6-mm long along the course of the medial branch adjacent to the SAP ensuring adequate coverage and treatment using VAS score. Responder status was defined as a 30% or greater improvement in VAS pain score from the pre-procedural VAS pain score. Outcomes were summarized by means and standard deviations for continuous outcomes, and frequencies (%) for categorical outcomes.

Study group

40 patients will receive the three needle approach.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using three needle approach

Intervention Type DEVICE

The primary outcome is to study the efficacy of the described technique by maximizing the lesion size (compared to control group) along the course of the medial branch adjacent to the SAP ensuring adequate coverage and treatment using VAS score.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using single needle approach

The primary outcome is to study the efficacy of the described technique which creates a lesion that we estimate to be 11.0-mm wide and 11.6-mm long along the course of the medial branch adjacent to the SAP ensuring adequate coverage and treatment using VAS score. Responder status was defined as a 30% or greater improvement in VAS pain score from the pre-procedural VAS pain score. Outcomes were summarized by means and standard deviations for continuous outcomes, and frequencies (%) for categorical outcomes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Radiofrequency ablation of medial nerve using three needle approach

The primary outcome is to study the efficacy of the described technique by maximizing the lesion size (compared to control group) along the course of the medial branch adjacent to the SAP ensuring adequate coverage and treatment using VAS score.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Control group Study group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age group of 18-60 yrs who are complaining of chronic lower back pain due to lumbar facet joint arthritis not responded to medical treatment for more than 6 months.
* Failed back surgery syndrome without instrumentation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient or relative in charge refusal.
* Associated lumbar disc prolapse.
* Negative diagnostic test.
* Contraindication for radiological exposure as pregnancy and osteoporosis.
* Inability to lie in a prone position.
* Failed back surgery syndrome with previous instrumentation insertion
* Contraindications for regional techniques
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amani Hassan Abdel-Wahab

Professor of anesthesia, ICU and pain management

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hamdy Abbas Youssef, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of anesthesia, intensive care and Pain Relief, Assiut University

Abdelraheem Elawamy, Ass. prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Associate Professor of anesthesia, intensive care and Pain Relief, Assiut University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut University

Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB:17200664

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Lumbar Trident Study
NCT05949970 COMPLETED
PNS vs RFA for Facet Joint Pain
NCT05952518 RECRUITING NA