Lateral Branch Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation vs. Conservative Therapy for Sacroiliac Joint Pain
NCT ID: NCT03601949
Last Updated: 2023-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
210 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-29
2022-06-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Denervation for Sacroiliac (SI) Joint Pain
NCT00373724
Radiofrequency Nerve Ablation Versus Sham to Treat Chronic Low Back Pain Caused by Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
NCT01104051
Trial Comparing Treatment With SInergy™ System to Conservative Treatment for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain
NCT01158092
Cryoneurolysis vs Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain
NCT06935539
Trial Assessing Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation as a Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Using the Sinergy System
NCT00802997
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Eligibility includes BOTH of the following:
* 50% pain relief lasting for the expected duration of anesthetic or medication from a therapeutic or diagnostic sacroiliac joint injection; AND
* 50% pain relief lasting for the expected duration of anesthetic from a standardized set of lateral branch blocks, with total volume of no more than 1 milliliter (ml) of 0.5% Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine (or similar). Ideally, 0.5 ml will be utilized at L5 and the remaining 0.5 ml should be divided in at least two locations along the foramen line
After the CRF treatment, the CRF treatment group subjects will visit the blinded assessor for follow up at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. At the month 3 visit (three months post-randomization), subjects initially randomized to the conservative therapy group will be assessed to determine eligibility to receive CRF treatment.
* If the conservative treatment subjects fail conservative therapy at 3 months (defined as failure to obtain a 2-point decrease in average pain score from baseline AND failure to obtain a rating of at least 5 on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale), they will be given the option of receiving CRF treatment.
* Subjects who choose to cross-over will ideally receive treatment within 30 days of their 3-month visit but they must receive treatment within 90 days of their 3-month visit. They will then be followed-up at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following CRF denervation (new Day 0).
* If the conservative treatment group subjects refuse or don't qualify for CRF treatment at 3 months, they will subsequently be followed-up at 6, 9, and 12 months from their Day 0.
Primary Analysis is planned after all initially treated subjects have completed their 3-month post-procedure visit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SInergy Cooled Radiofrequency
Halyard Health SInergy Cooled Radiofrequency in addition to standard medical management
SInergy Cooled Radiofrequency
ablation of low back pain
Medical Management
physical therapy, medications, lifestyle changes
Medical Management
Standard Medical Management
Medical Management
physical therapy, medications, lifestyle changes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SInergy Cooled Radiofrequency
ablation of low back pain
Medical Management
physical therapy, medications, lifestyle changes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to understand the informed consent, and able to complete outcome measures.
3. Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain that is refractory to standard of care treatments such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), physical therapy, etc.
4. At least one positive SIJ pain provocation test (Distraction, Gaenslen's, FABER, Sacral Sulcus tenderness, thigh thrust, compression or sacral thrust).
5. Back pain is predominantly below the lumbar (L) 5 vertebrae.
6. Chronic low back pain lasting for longer than three months.
7. Greater than 50% pain relief lasting for the expected duration of anesthetic or medication from a therapeutic or diagnostic SIJ injection.
8. Greater than 50% pain relief lasting the duration of anesthetic from lateral branch block (done on different days than SIJ injection).
9. Stabilized on pain medication regimen for \> 2 months, as defined by a \< 10% change in dosage.
10. Numeric rating scale indicating an average pain score of \> 4 over the last seven days. (returned to pre-lateral branch block baseline pain).
11. All other possible sources of low back pain have been ruled out as the primary pain generator, including, but not limited to: suspected advanced degenerative joint disease, the intervertebral discs, bone fracture, the zygapophyseal joints, the hip joint, symptomatic spondylolisthesis, tumor, and other regional soft tissue structures (this is done by physical exam, medical history, and magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography/X-ray, as required).
12. Willing to utilize double barrier contraceptive method, if of child-bearing potential.
13. Willingness to provide informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study.
14. Physician believes ablation of the SIJ is an appropriate treatment for the patient.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Spinal pathology that may impede recovery such as spina bifida occulta, grade II or higher spondylolisthesis at vertebrae L5/sacroiliac (S) 1, or scoliosis.
3. Symptomatic moderate or severe foraminal or central canal stenosis.
4. Systemic infection or localized infection at anticipated introducer entry site.
5. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g., acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), cancer, diabetes, etc.)
6. Chronic severe conditions such as rheumatoid/inflammatory arthritis.
7. Pregnancy or recent delivery (within three months).
8. Active radiculopathy pain from lumbar spine.
9. Active hip pathology.
10. Major surgery within three months prior to signing informed consent.
11. Prior radiofrequency denervation of the lateral sacral nerves.
12. Ongoing/unresolved worker's compensation, injury litigation, military medical board, or disability remuneration claims.
13. Allergy to injected substances or medications used in procedure.
14. Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kilograms/meter (squared).
15. Current prescribed opioid medications equivalent to 90 mg of morphine per 24 hours or greater.
16. Subject is currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator, or defibrillator.
17. Participation in another clinical trial/investigation that could interfere with this trial 30 days prior to signing informed consent.
18. Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol requirements.
21 Years
110 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Avanos Medical
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Curd, MS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Avanos Medical
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mehul Desai
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Millennium Pain Center
Bloomington, Illinois, United States
Ochsner Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Shravani Durbhakula
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
Premier Pain Centers
Shrewsbury, New Jersey, United States
Adam Carinci
Rochester, New York, United States
Womack Army Medical Center
Fort Bragg, North Carolina, United States
The Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Clinical Investigations
Edmond, Oklahoma, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Lynn Kohan
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Michael DePalma
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cohen SP, Kapural L, Kohan L, Li S, Hurley R, Vallejo R, Eshraghi Y, Dinakar P, Durbhakula S, Beall DP, Desai MJ, Reece D, Christiansen S, Chang MH, Carinci AJ, DePalma M. Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of chronic sacroiliac joint pain: 12-month follow-up results from the observational phase of a randomized, multicenter, comparative-effectiveness crossover study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Mar 15:rapm-2024-106315. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106315. Online ahead of print.
Cohen SP, Kapural L, Kohan L, Li S, Hurley RW, Vallejo R, Eshraghi Y, Dinakar P, Durbhakula S, Beall DP, Desai MJ, Reece D, Christiansen S, Chang MH, Carinci AJ, DePalma M. Cooled radiofrequency ablation versus standard medical management for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a multicenter, randomized comparative effectiveness study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Mar 4;49(3):184-191. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104568.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
105-17-0002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.