The Food Phone Project

NCT ID: NCT01719445

Last Updated: 2024-11-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Primary Aim of the project is to modify the RFPM for adolescents and to address the concerns identified by the reviewers of the first grant application. We will then test the RFPM's validity (accuracy) compared to the validity of pen-and-paper food records.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Primary Aim of the project is to modify the RFPM for adolescents and to address the concerns identified by the reviewers of the first grant application. We will then test the RFPM's validity (accuracy) compared to the validity of pen-and-paper food records. Our experience and the literature indicate that the RFPM is acceptable and feasible in school settings. Following modification of the RFPM and pilot testing with 4 adolescents, we will test the reliability and validity of both the RFPM and food records when used by 60 adolescents (12 to 18 years of age). During one week, participants will use the RFPM and during another week they will use food records (the order will be balanced across participants). The accuracy of each method will be examined by comparing energy and nutrient intake (collectively referred to as food intake or FI) to three gold standards: 1) doubly labeled water or DLW (energy intake only, or EIDLW), 2) a laboratory-based test meal (FILaboratory), and 3) food intake during lunch in a school cafeteria (FISchool). User-satisfaction and participant burden will also be compared between methods, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will determine if and under what conditions one method is more cost-effective than the other.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Comparison of Energy Intake Methods

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RFPM/Paper and Pen Method

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* boy or girl of any race
* age 12 to 18 years, inclusive
* willing to use the RFPM for one week and pen-and-paper food records for one week
* willing to complete one laboratory-based food test during week 3
* willing to use the RFPM and food records during the laboratory-based test.

Exclusion Criteria

-weight unstable (\>1.1 pounds weight change in one week based on regressed daily body weights).
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Corby K. Martin

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Corby K Martin, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01DK089051

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

PBRC 10040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Meal Replacement Study
NCT02355041 WITHDRAWN PHASE3
Fast Food Photo Study
NCT02267954 COMPLETED NA
Solutions for Hunger and Regulating Eating
NCT05004883 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Meal Timing and Blood Pressure
NCT04133701 COMPLETED NA