National Cancer Institute Food Study

NCT ID: NCT00978406

Last Updated: 2020-03-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

83 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-08-26

Study Completion Date

2020-02-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Information about Americans food choices and opinions helps researchers and law makers to develop policies and programs to promote health. For this reason, it is important to be able to collect good quality information about how people think about food. This project will compare different ways of collecting information about food from adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives:

-To compare different ways of collecting information about food choices and opinions from adults.

Eligibility:

* Individuals between the ages of 20 and 70, recruited from a database of volunteers who wish to participate in research studies.
* Volunteers must have high-speed Internet access.
* Individuals who have previously been involved in a research study will be excluded.

Design:

-Participants will come to a research study center for three consecutive meals (approximately 45 minutes per meal). On the following day, participants will return to the study center for an interview about their food choices and opinions (approximately 45 minutes).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Validation Study Diet Surveys Nutritional Assessment Epidemiology Methodologic Study

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy volunteers

Healthy volunteers

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects will be accrued from a variety of racial and ethnic groups and of varying educational achievement, though these characteristics will not be used to assess eligibility.
* All subjects will provide informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nancy A. Potischman, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Westat, Inc.

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kirkpatrick SI, Potischman N, Dodd KW, Douglass D, Zimmerman TP, Kahle LL, Thompson FE, George SM, Subar AF. The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls. J Nutr. 2016 Dec;146(12):2567-2573. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.237271. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27807039 (View on PubMed)

Kirkpatrick SI, Subar AF, Douglass D, Zimmerman TP, Thompson FE, Kahle LL, George SM, Dodd KW, Potischman N. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100(1):233-40. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.083238. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24787491 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09-C-N209

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

999909209

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Metabolic Response to Food in Lung Cancer
NCT05937074 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
The Fruit and Vegetable Study
NCT00468156 COMPLETED NA
Biologic Assessment of Satiety
NCT01506297 COMPLETED
Metabolic Fuels Study
NCT02235038 COMPLETED NA
Fast Food Photo Study
NCT02267954 COMPLETED NA