Improving Patient Outcome in Group Therapy for Eating Disorders
NCT ID: NCT01693237
Last Updated: 2014-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2/PHASE3
159 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Virtual Body Project Groups Led by Peers Versus Clinicians
NCT05993728
Target Engagement of a Novel Dissonance-Based Treatment for DSM-5 Eating Disorders
NCT03261050
Treatment Outcome in Eating Disorders
NCT03599921
Comparing Two Group Therapy Treatments for Binge Eating Disorder
NCT00071578
Comparing Enhanced Cognitive-behavior Therapy and Family-based Treatment for Adolescents With an Eating Disorder
NCT06256380
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: The current trial, which will be conducted from August 2012 to August 2014, aims to investigate the impact of continuous feedback on adherence and outcome in group psychotherapy. The hypothesis is that continuous feedback to patient and therapist on treatment progress and alliance will 1)increase adherence 2) increase treatment outcome.
Method: The trial is set up in a randomized design with 159 patients allocated to a) treatment with feedback intervention or b) treatment as usual.
Participants: The participants are diagnosed with Bulimia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder or Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified.
Interventions: In the experimental group, two sets of feedback measures are added to the standard treatment: Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and Group Session Rating Scale (GSRS). The ORS assesses areas of life functioning known to change as a result of therapeutic intervention. The GSRS assesses key dimensions of effective therapeutic relationships.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group psychotherapy
20 sessions of systemic and narrative group psychotherapy
Group psychotherapy
20 sessions of systemic and narrative group therapy
Group psychotherapy with feedback
20 sessions of systemic and narrative group psychotherapy with session-to-session feedback to patient and therapist.
Group psychotherapy with feedback
20 sessions of systemic and narrative group therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group psychotherapy
20 sessions of systemic and narrative group therapy
Group psychotherapy with feedback
20 sessions of systemic and narrative group therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI of minimum 20.
* Meet the diagnostic criteria for Bulimia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder or EDNOS according to DSM- IV.
Exclusion Criteria
* Psychosis.
* Severe depression.
* Abuse of alcohol, medicine and/or narcotics up to 3 months before referral.
* Use of cannabis once a month is accepted at intake but must stop during treatment.
* Concomitant psychotherapeutic/ psychiatric treatment outside Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre.
* Severe or non-regulated physical co-morbidity.
* Pregnancy.
* Unable to understand Danish.
* Previous participation in the current trial.
* Considered unable to attend treatment sessions as planned.
* Lack of informed consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Denmark
OTHER_GOV
Marianne Lau, MD, DSci.
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marianne Lau, MD, DSci.
Research Manager
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marianne E. Lau, D.Sci.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre
Gentofte Municipality, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Davidsen AH, Poulsen S, Lindschou J, Winkel P, Trondarson MF, Waaddegaard M, Lau M. Feedback in group psychotherapy for eating disorders: A randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 May;85(5):484-494. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000173. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
Davidsen AH, Poulsen S, Waaddegaard M, Lindschou J, Lau M. Feedback versus no feedback in improving patient outcome in group psychotherapy for eating disorders (F-EAT): protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2014 Apr 23;15:138. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-138.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-084080
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.