Prospective Liver Tumor (ProLiT) Database

NCT ID: NCT01607788

Last Updated: 2012-05-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators propose a prospective, web-based database (developed within the framework of Quickbase, Intuit) which will allow an evaluation of the data for patients with a liver tumour who receive a liver transplant. Each site will continue to transplant according to their own criteria for inclusion on the waiting list. Each center will be responsible to enter a short list of data points at time of listing, transplant, and at 1 and 2 years post transplant. Data will be gathered prospectively through a web-based anaonymized database, and outcomes analyzed yearly X5 for tumour recurrence and patient survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A previous retrospective study evaluated the UNOS database of liver transplant recipients for use of total tumor volume (TTV) and alphafetoprotein (AFP) as criteria for selection of candidates for liver transplantation. The results confirmed a prior publication demonstrating that tumors modestly beyond Milan size limitation and irrespective of tumor numbers can achieve excellent outcomes, while providing important insight into which tumors within Milan criteria remain with a high likelihood of recurrence (high AFP). The work has now been published in Hepatology.

The investigators propose a prospective evaluation of these composite criteria, using data from patients receiving a liver transplant in order to have a larger population. Centers will continue to transplant according to their own criteria for inclusion on the waiting list. Data will be gathered prospectively through a web-based database (Quickbase, Intuit) and outcomes analyzed yearly for 5 years follow-up for tumour recurrence and patient survival.

Each center will be responsible to enter a short list of data points for their patients at time of listing, time of transplant, and yearly post transplant. Data points have been kept to a minimum in the hope that this will encourage participation in this database.

The database will be set up with 3 levels of access:

1. data entry only (one at each site)
2. review site data and composite data from other sites(one at each site)
3. review all sites and aggregate (for analysis and publication) Sites will only be able to edit and review their own patient data. They will be able to view aggregate data from other sites from which all identifiers have been removed.

Data will not be used to manage patient care in any way. The data will be used only to evaluate outcomes of patients who had a liver tumour at the time of their liver transplant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Evidence of Liver Transplantation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with hepatocellular carcinoma listed for liver transplantation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alberta

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

London Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Geneva

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Geneva, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christian Toso

Médecin Adjoint Agrégé, University of Geneva

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Norman Kneteman, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Geneva

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alberta

Edmonton, , Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Norman Kneteman, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Norman Kneteman, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ProLit

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HCC Innervation Assessment
NCT06886763 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Liver Regeneration
NCT03396705 TERMINATED