Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2429 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-08-31
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Liver Perfusion MRI With Quantification of Tumoral Perfusion for Early Assessment of the Response of Antiangiogenics Treatments in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02585687
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction for Abdominal CT of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared With 3-TESLA MRI
NCT06037343
FAST-IRM for HCC suRveillance in pAtients With High risK of Liver Cancer.
NCT05095714
A National Registry of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT00178867
Study of Liver Fibrosis Stage Assessment by Fibroblast Activation Protein Imaging in Patients With Biopsy for Suspected or Proven Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
NCT06160271
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Phase 1 has two main stages: The first stage will identify unique tumor phenotypes based on the iBiopsy phenotyping platform which extracts image-based signatures corresponding to each individual phenotype and will assess the analytic/technical performance of the iBiopsy platform. Gaps in characterization of the analytic readout under varying conditions of image acquisition and the repeat variability under identical analytic conditions will be filled by the proposed design. Once a set of suitable tumor phenotypes have been identified they will advance to the characterization phase. This will be done by the evaluation of an initial representative specific dataset (e.g. hundreds of patients) for training (to discover) and validation (to test robustness). The second stage will complete a preliminary biological/clinical validation of the above phenotypes for diagnosis and disease subtyping. This includes the investigation of a large dataset (e.g. thousands of patients) CDR for training and validation, using histopathology data as the reference standard and the optimization of the imaging signatures using AI based learning methodologies.
* Phase 2 also has two stages. The first stage of Phase 2 is to rigorously validate the candidate phenotypes emerging from Phase 1 for the diagnosis of subjects with HCC. The second stage of Phase 2 is to validate these select candidate phenotypes for prediction of outcome. These rigorous validations include using large CDR of patients with HCC (late stage biological/clinical validation).
Traditional medical image retrieval systems such as Picture Archival Systems (PACS) use structured data (metadata) or unstructured text annotations (physician reports) to retrieve the images. However, the content of the images cannot be completely described by words, and the understanding of images is different from person to person, therefore text-based image retrieval system cannot meet the requirements for massive images retrieval. In response to these limitations, CBIR systems using visual features extracted from the images in lieu of keywords have been developed. An important and useful outcome of these CBIR is the possibility to bridge the semantic gap, allowing users to search an image repository for high-level image features allowing the matching of image-based phenotype signatures extracted directly from the query medical image with phenotype signatures indexed in a registry.
The Median Technologies CBIR system uses patented algorithms and processes to decode the images by automatically extracting hundreds of imaging features as well as highly compact signatures from tens of thousands of 3D image patches computed across the entire image without the need for any prior segmentation. In addition to detailed phenotypic profiles which can be correlated with histopathology and genomic and plasmatic profiles, the system generates a unique signature for each tile providing a fingerprint of the "image-based phenotype" of the corresponding tissue. Using massively parallel computing methods, imaging biomarkers and phenotype signatures are extracted from a target image are then organized into clusters of similar signatures and indexed for real-time search and retrieval into schema-less (NoSQL) databases.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patient with hepatocellular carcinoma
Phenotype signature database building Image features extraction and clustering
Image features extraction and clustering
The image processing operations required for local content-based image feature extraction consist of two main tasks: 1) tiling the images in smaller VOIs, typically a small cube, whose size depends on the modality, on the image resolution and on the purpose of the content-based query, and 2) performing feature extraction operations on the VOIs.
The Feature Extraction Engine performs totally unsupervised, automatic and asynchronous extractions of features from the images, organizes and indexes them in a no-SQL database based on unique similarity metric. The results of this phase are a series of clusters of phenotype signatures.
Phenotype signature database building
Since the clusters are self-organizing their pathophysiological meaning is not readily apparent and requires further analysis. The characterization of each cluster is performed by analyzing representative samples and their respective correlation with histopathology results. After a series of iterations, the clusters are organized to correlate with distinct tissue subtypes identified by their signature similarity. The final number of clusters is not known a priori and depends on the heterogeneity of the underlying imaging phenotypes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Image features extraction and clustering
The image processing operations required for local content-based image feature extraction consist of two main tasks: 1) tiling the images in smaller VOIs, typically a small cube, whose size depends on the modality, on the image resolution and on the purpose of the content-based query, and 2) performing feature extraction operations on the VOIs.
The Feature Extraction Engine performs totally unsupervised, automatic and asynchronous extractions of features from the images, organizes and indexes them in a no-SQL database based on unique similarity metric. The results of this phase are a series of clusters of phenotype signatures.
Phenotype signature database building
Since the clusters are self-organizing their pathophysiological meaning is not readily apparent and requires further analysis. The characterization of each cluster is performed by analyzing representative samples and their respective correlation with histopathology results. After a series of iterations, the clusters are organized to correlate with distinct tissue subtypes identified by their signature similarity. The final number of clusters is not known a priori and depends on the heterogeneity of the underlying imaging phenotypes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have a lesion visualized on CT scans / MRI with histological confirmation (surgical resection, biopsy, transplant).
* With a CT scan / MRI performed within 6 months prior to biopsy, surgical or transplant intervention.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Olivier Lucidarme, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assitance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Groupe Hospitalier La Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APHP191046
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.