Caudal Epidural Injection of Dextrose For Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT01547364
Last Updated: 2018-04-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-29
2015-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Explore the immediate and short term (to 48 hour) analgesic potential of epidural D5W in comparison to normal saline.
2. Determine if cumulative benefit results from caudal dextrose injection.
3. Evaluate accuracy of a small needle vertical approach caudal injection that will allow for blind injection of D5W.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Evaluate Safety of C-1101 Versus Sterile Saline in Adults With Chronic Painful Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT07264270
Trans-foraminal Lumbar Epidural Injection of Dexmedetomidine Against Magnesium Sulfate When Combined With Dexamethasone in Uni-lateral Lower Limb Radicular Pain. Multi-centeric Comparative Study
NCT05271721
A Preemptive Epidural Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT01117610
Treatment of Chronic Thoracic and Neck and Upper Extremity Pain
NCT01071369
Can Dexmedetomidine With Hyalase Augment Quality and Duration of Analgesia When Added to Lumbar Epidural Steroid in Failed Back Surgery. Randomized Double Blind Study
NCT05349448
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Explore the immediate and short term (to 48 hour) analgesic potential of epidural D5W in comparison to normal saline.
2. Determine if cumulative benefit results from caudal dextrose injection.
In addition to determining potential benefit from caudal epidural of dextrose, the accuracy of a simple vertical approach to injection of dextrose is to be evaluated. If this vertical approach is accurate it will allow for
1. More comfort with injection.
2. Less need for radiographic exposure, in that needle placement is quicker and easier, allowing for less fluoroscopy time.
3. Potential for blind injection of solutions that do not include anesthetic or particulate matter, increasing potential applicability of caudal dextrose injection to situations in which fluoroscopy is not available.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Caudal Saline
Saline
Injection of 10 ml of normal saline into the caudal epidural space
Caudal Dextrose
Dextrose
Injection of 10 ml or dextrose 5% in water into the caudal epidural space
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Saline
Injection of 10 ml of normal saline into the caudal epidural space
Dextrose
Injection of 10 ml or dextrose 5% in water into the caudal epidural space
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Some pain below the iliac crest (Either in buttock or in leg)
* At least one conservative (non-injection) modality of treatment to include physical therapy, chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation, exercises, drug therapy, and relative rest.
* Opiate use absent or controlled
* Psychiatric history absent or controlled
* Current medical stability
* Absent steroid use history or no allergy or intolerance to steroid use
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Smigel, Liza, M.D.
INDIV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Liza Smigel, M.D.
Liza Smigel, M.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Liza Smigel, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Liza Smigel, M.D., P.A.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Liza Smigel, M.D.
Hilo, Hawaii, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SweetCaudal
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.