Phase III Study Comparing Two Methods of Cardioplegia in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01444235

Last Updated: 2013-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of the cardioprotective effects and safety of two cardioplegic solutions (solutions used during a cardiac arrest in the heart surgery) in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this investigation is to compare the cardioprotective effects and safety of two cardioplegic solutions, HTK Cardioplegic Solution (Custodiol) and Custodiol-N in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass surgery. The study design is a prospective, double blind, multicenter, randomized, Phase III comparison study intended to demonstrate non-inferiority in surgical outcome between Custodiol and Custodiol-N as determined by CK-MB area under the curve (primary endpoint), catecholamine requirement(cumulative dose) and cardiac Troponin T, occurrence of comorbid events postoperatively (e.g., myocardial infarction).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Custodiol

After cross clamping of the aorta on cardiopulmonary bypass, the Custodiol solution, at a temperature of 4 - 6°C, will be infused antegrade into the root of the aorta.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Custodiol

Intervention Type DRUG

Route of administration: by infusion duration: infusion technique will be continued for seven minutes dosage: until 1500-2000 mL of solution have been infused

Custodiol-N

After cross clamping of the aorta on cardiopulmonary bypass, the Custodiol-N solution, at a temperature of 4 - 6°C, will be infused antegrade into the root of the aorta.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Custodiol-N

Intervention Type DRUG

Route of administration: by infusion Dosage: will be infused antegrade into the root of the aorta until 1500-2000 mL of solution have been infused Duration: infusion technique will be continued for seven minutes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Custodiol-N

Route of administration: by infusion Dosage: will be infused antegrade into the root of the aorta until 1500-2000 mL of solution have been infused Duration: infusion technique will be continued for seven minutes

Intervention Type DRUG

Custodiol

Route of administration: by infusion duration: infusion technique will be continued for seven minutes dosage: until 1500-2000 mL of solution have been infused

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

The study population will be selected from patients of either sex with coronary artery disease (CAD) who are to undergo cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass surgery.

1. Patients \>/=35 and \</=80 years of age
2. Male or female with 2 or 3 vessel coronary disease, who are scheduled for elective CBP surgery for coronary revascularisation
3. Presence of definite CAD for which surgical intervention is deemed necessary, without evidence of ongoing infarction.

Patients with unstable angina can be included as long as there is no objective (negative cardiac isoenzymes in the immediate six hours preceding CABG, current intravenous use of nitrate therapy) or subjective (absence of prolonged symptoms suggestive of coronary insufficiency that do not respond to pharmacologic intervention) evidence of myocardial necrosis.
4. Eligibility for Swan-Ganz-Catheter
5. Able to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial and to provide written informed consent to participate in the study
6. No evidence of severe organic or psychiatric disease by history or physical examination
7. No history of alcohol abuse, illicit drug use, significant mental illness, physical dependence to any opioid, or no any history of drug abuse or addiction within 12 months of study enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients undergoing valve repair or replacement
2. History of recent (\< 6 weeks) Q-wave myocardial infarction
3. Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35% (as assessed by any one of the following: contrast ventriculography, multigated acquisition scanning \[MUGA\], or 2-D ECHO)
4. Patients on intra-aortic balloon devices or with history of previous coronary artery bypass surgery
5. Pregnant or lactating patients
6. Patients who have participated in any other investigational studies within 30 days previous to enrollment
7. Patients in cardiogenic shock (defined as a systolic BP \< 90 mmHg for over one hour despite inotropic and chronotropic support)
8. Patients with severe chronic obstructive lung disease (FEV1 \< 50%)
9. Previous cardiac valvular disease (clinical relevant)
10. Dialysis or creatinine \> 2 mmol/L
11. BMS-Stent \< 4 weeks
12. DES-Stent \< 6 month
13. Guidance depended Plavix therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr. F. Köhler Chemie GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gabor Szabo, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Cardiac Surgery of University of Heidelberg

Nikolaus Pizanis, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klinik für Thorax- und Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen

Florian Wagner, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf

Thorsten Doenst, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klinik für Herz- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena

Martin Misfeld, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH, Klinik für Herzchirurgie

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinik für Thorax- und Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Abt. Herzchirugie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Klinik für Herz- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CL-N-CSM-III/01/08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Etomidate Versus Propofol in CABG Surgery
NCT06068764 RECRUITING PHASE4