Combined Use of a Novel Cardioplegic Formula With MPS® Versus Cardioplexol ® in Urgent Isolated CABG Using MiECC in Patients With Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction

NCT ID: NCT04309994

Last Updated: 2020-03-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

307 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-01

Study Completion Date

2020-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to compare the two cardioplegia solutions (blood cardioplegia by means of MPS ® vs. Cardioplexol ®) regarding perioperative outcome and with special attention to cardiac markers in patients with a recent heart attack.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Attack Cardioplegia Solution Adverse Reaction Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

bypass surgery with blood cardioplegia by means of MPS

Myocardial protection system (MPS)

Intervention Type OTHER

cardioplegia solution, A separate pumpsystem by which Blood cardioplegia with individually composable additives as cardioplegia solution can be used

Active Comparator

bypass surgery with blood cardioplegia by means of Cardioplexol ®

Cardioplexol

Intervention Type OTHER

cardioplegia solution

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Myocardial protection system (MPS)

cardioplegia solution, A separate pumpsystem by which Blood cardioplegia with individually composable additives as cardioplegia solution can be used

Intervention Type OTHER

Cardioplexol

cardioplegia solution

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who underwent a CABG using MPS® or Cardioplexol ®
* Heart attack less than 7 days before surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* use of other cardioplegia solution than Cardioplexol ® or MPS®
* other inventions than CABG
* explicit will of the patient that his data may not be used
* denied general consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oliver Reuthebuch, Prof. Dr. med.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cardiac Surgery Clinic, University Hospital Basel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cardiac Surgery Clinic University Hospital Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-02383; ch20Reuthebuch

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Etomidate Versus Propofol in CABG Surgery
NCT06068764 RECRUITING PHASE4
Unstable Angina Pectoris Trial
NCT00000486 COMPLETED PHASE3
Comparison of Milrinone and Epinephrine on TAPSE
NCT07144267 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA